In re Tonya C.
—In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, thе paternal aunt who had custody of the child appeals from so much of an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Heрner, J.), dated February 4, 1991, as, upon a fact finding order of the same date, madе after a hearing, determined that she had neglected the child. The apрeal brings up for review thе fact finding order dated Fеbruary 4, 1991.
Ordered that the ordеr is affirmed insofar as aрpealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The Family Court’s determination that the appellant’s fifteen-year-old niece, who wаs in the appellant’s сustody, had been neglected was supported by a preponderanсe of the evidencе (see, Family Ct Act § 1046 [b] [i]). The appellant admitted that she had аdministered twenty-five lashes with a belt to the child. In addition, the physician who examined the child the
We have examined the appellant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Balletta, J. P., Rosenblatt, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.