In re Tiffany H.
The court properly concluded that a residential placement with emphasis on sex offender therapy and counseling was the least restrictive alternative consistent with appellant‘s best interests, as well as those of the community (see Matter of Katherine W., 62 NY2d 947 [1984]), where probation had already failed (see Matter of Michael OO., 269 AD2d 633 [2000]). The court properly considered the probation and psychiatric reports and all the relevant factors including appellant‘s noncompliance with probation. Concur—Friedman, J.P., Nardelli, Williams, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.