| N.Y. Sur. Ct. | Dec 23, 1960
In this probate proceeding it is undisputed that the testator validly executed a will and four codicils.
It appears that shortly before the testator left his residence to enter the hospital in which he died, he executed a fourth codicil. This instrument made certain directions and then stated that “ the codicil dated the 14th day of May, 1954 [first codicil] is herewith cancelled and of no force and effect, it being my intention that this codicil is to supersede the provisions of the codicil dated the 14th day of May, 1954 [first codicil].”
After the execution of the fourth codicil, the testator placed the instrument in a dresser drawer. After his death, the will and the first three codicils were discovered but the fourth codicil was never found.
The court is now required to determine the disposition of the fourth codicil and its effect upon the first codicil.
There is a presumption of revocation created where a will, shown to have existed and to have been in the testator’s possession, cannot be found after his death (Matter of Staiger, 243 N.Y. 468" court="NY" date_filed="1926-11-16" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/in-re-the-probate-of-the-will-of-staiger-3631220?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="3631220">243 N. Y. 468, 472). The evidence in the case at bar was not sufficient to overcome this presumption.
The execution of the fourth codicil accomplished a revocation of the first codicil, and the destruction or revocation of the
The contention that the draftsman erred in inserting the clause of cancellation in the fourth codicil is not supported by the evidence. Accordingly, the first and fourth codicils will be denied probate. Settle decree.