History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re the Objections of Brady
246 A.D. 561
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1935
|
Check Treatment

Order declaring invalid the nominating petition of Paul Siegal, as nominee for the office of Assemblyman, fourth Assembly district, county of Queens, under the Fusion party emblem, and restraining the board of elections from printing his name for use on the voting machines or in any way giving effect to his petition affirmed, without costs. The court is of the opinion that subdivision 1 of section 330 of the Election Law is not applicable to cases of contested nominations; it is applicable merely to primary designations. And the court is further of the opinion that the twelve-day provision of subdivision 2 of section 330 is directory and not mandatory. (Matter of Hennessy, 164 N. Y. 393; Matter of Stoddard, 158 App. Div. 525; Matter of Greenwald v. Boyle, 179 id. 672; Fallon v. Hattemer, 229 id. 397.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: In re the Objections of Brady
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Oct 15, 1935
Citation: 246 A.D. 561
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.