In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of the Administrator of the Estate of Draper, 109 Misc. 404

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of the Administrator of the Estate of Draper

109 Misc. 404 | N.Y. Sur. Ct. | 1919

Fish, S.

The petitioner, who is the husband of decedent, asks in this proceeding, which is for the *405settlement of Ms accounts as administrator, that there be directed to be paid to Mm as the husband of the decedent the sum of $150, which he claims should have been set aside to him pursuant to the provisions of section 2670 of the Code of Civil Procedure. I think the provision contained in section 2735 of the Code of Civil Procedure that the surrogate’s decree on judicial settlement ‘ ‘ may ’ ’ award to a surviving husband the same relief as to set-off of property wMch may be awarded on a petition therefor pursuant to section 2671 of the Code of Civil Procedure is mandatory. Nelligan v. Groth, 126 App. Div. 444; 36 Cyc. 1160-1161. Section 2670 of the Code of Civil Procedure compels the set-off to the husband and makes the property set off his property; the husband, therefore, has a claim de jure to the set-off, and under such circumstances the power given to the court to make the set-off will be construed as mandatory.

Furthermore, in the first sentence of said section 2735 it is provided that the decree must direct payment and distribution to the persons entitled according to their respective rights, and under said sections 2670 and 2671 the husband is entitled to have set aside to him money or other personal property of the value of $150.

There is no discretion as to the amount to be set off under subdivision 4 of said section 2670; the provision is that certain specified articles shall not be deemed assets, and among the articles thus specified is money not exceeding in value $150; if there is more than $150 in money, all above that amount is an asset, while such amount and ¿11 below is not an asset. Matter of Bidgood, 36 Misc. Rep. 516.

Decreed accordingly.