In re The Foreclosure of a Deed of Trust Executed by Ferrell Bros. Farms
Essex Mortgage Corporation (Essex) appeals from the trial court’s order granting the trustee in a foreclosure proceeding a trustee’s commission and permitting the payment of attorneys’ fees.
This case arises out of a foreclosure proceeding instituted by East Carolina Farm Credit, ACA, who held the first mortgage (the instrument) on property owned by Ferrell Brothers Farms, Inc. Essex had the rights of a second mortgagee on the same property. After the sale, Essex filed notice with the Currituck County Superior Court claiming ownership of any surplus funds available from the sale. After learning that Essex would challenge the amount of their commission and fees, the trustee and attorneys filed motions with the superior court for the allowance of their respective commission and fees. Essex then filed motions “to limit” the attorneys’ fees and the trustee’s commissions, on the grounds that those payments reduced the amount of surplus that Essex would eventually recover.
At a hearing before a superior court judge on 3 March 1994 to determine whether the trustee’s commission and attorneys’ fees should be paid, Essex was not allowed to present evidence challenging the reasonableness of the commission or fees. Because a motion was pending, the trial judge determined that the requested commission and fees were reasonable and held the trustee was entitled to five percent of the gross sale proceeds as his commission and the attorneys were entitled to fifteen percent of the outstanding balance at the time the foreclosure action was instituted as their fees.
The dispositive issue is whether a trustee conducting a sale of real property pursuant to an express power of sale contained in a mortgage or deed of trust is required to receive court approval of the amount of the disbursements made pursuant to
Upon default and after notice and hearing as required by Chapter 45, Article 2A, a person so designated in a mortgage or deed of trust is authorized to conduct a sale of the property described in the instrument. The sale must be conducted consistent with Chapter 45, Article 2A. The proceeds from the sale
shall be applied by the person making the sale, in the following order, to the payment of—
(1) Costs and expenses of the sale, including the trustee’s commission, if any, and a reasonable auctioneer’s fee if such expense has been incurred;
(2) Taxes due and unpaid on the property sold, as provided by G.S. 105-385, unless the notice of sale provided that the property be sold subject to taxes thereon and the property was so sold;
(3) Special assessments, or any installments thereof, against the property sold, which are due and unpaid, as provided by G.S. 105-385, unless the notice of sale provided that the property be sold subject to special assessment thereon and the property was so sold;
(4) The obligation secured by the mortgage, deed of trust or conditional sale contract.
The trustee is entitled to compensation “as is stipulated in the instrument,”
Chapter 45, Article 2A contains no language that suggests the trustee must seek or obtain approval from either the clerk of the superior court or the court prior to making the disbursements permitted in
Accordingly, the trial court did not err in refusing to allow Essex to present evidence on the reasonableness of the trustee’s commission and attorneys’ fees. Indeed, the reasonableness of these expenses was not an issue properly before the trial court.
Affirmed.