118 Misc. 879 | N.Y. Sur. Ct. | 1922
This is an application for the payment of a legacy. The 6th paragraph of the will of testator creates a trust for the benefit of his son during his life “ and upon his death, I give and bequeath Five Thousand ($5,000) Dollars of said principal sum to Kate Reilly, wife of my son John J. Reilly; the remainder of said principal sum to become a part of my residuary estate, to be distributed as hereinafter provided * * Kate Reilly, therefore, took a vested remainder in the fund held in trust for her husband to the extent of $5,000. Connelly v. O’Brien, 166 N. Y. 406; Matter of Gee, 201 App. Div. 540; Livingston v. Greene, 52 N. Y. 118; Hershee v. Simpson, 154 id. 496. The language of that part of the will is unambiguous and the bequest unqualified. Although the time of enjoyment of the remainder was postponed, the testator did not attach to the payment thereof any terms or conditions. This does not seem to be true of other bequests in the will. The executors and trustees claim that the remainderman, having predeceased the life beneficiary, the language of the 11th paragraph of the will precludes the granting of this application. This contention cannot be sustained. March v. March, 186 N. Y. 99. The latter paragraph reads as follows: “ In case of the death of any of the beneficiaries to the trust funds herein provided, before the payment to them under the aforesaid terms and conditions, then I direct that such
Submit a decree providing for the payment of the legacy to the present administrator of the estate of Kate Reilly without interest.
Decreed accordingly.