208 Misc. 966 | N.Y. Sur. Ct. | 1955
In this discovery proceeding the administratrix seeks to recover the assets of a window cleaning business. Respondent, son of decedent, claims title as surviving partner to one half of such property. Respondent’s defense of loches is dismissed.
The certified copy of the certificate of partnership filed pursuant to section 440 of the Penal Law raises the presumption that decedent and respondent became partners as of March 5, 1953 (Penal Law, § 440, subd. 6). This presumption was not overcome by the proof offered at the hearing. As a result there is no jurisdiction in this court to compel delivery of any assets which constituted partnership property (Matter of Lichtblau, 146 Misc. 278; Matter of Katz, 63 N. Y. S. 2d 298; Matter of Kurzbam, N. Y. L. J., March 5, 1953, p. 738, col. 7; see Matter of Di Stefano, 63 N. Y. S. 2d 296, and Partnership Law, § 51, subd. 2, par. [d]). Based upon the evidence, however, the court finds that when decedent converted the business from a sole proprietorship to a partnership with respondent, he
Submit decree on one day’s notice.