Varnum, S.
In this matter a, transfer tax appraiser was appointed on the petition of the Comptroller of the State of Hew York, the executors claiming that no part of the estate was taxable .and declining to apply for one. The executors appeared specially before the appraiser for the purpose of objecting to his jurisdiction and that of this court, and filed affidavits to the effect that the decedent’s property consisted only of realty and less than $10,000 of personalty, and that no property had been transferred by him in contemplation of death. The appraiser proposing to continue the appraisal, an application was made to Mr. Surrogate Arnold to vacate the order appointing him, and a stay granted pending its determination. The matter has now been resubmitted to me, the ground on which it is sought to vacate the appointment being that the petition of the Comptroller did not contain sufficient allegations, to support the order. From the language of section 230 of chapter 908 of the Laws of 1896, as amended by section 6 of chapter 284 of the Laws of 1891, it appears that the surrogate may appoint an appraiser without any petition at all, “ upon his own mo*234tion.” See Matter of Westurn, 152 N.Y. 93" court="NY" date_filed="1897-03-02" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/in-re-the-estate-of-westurn-3587674?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="3587674">152 N. Y. 93, 96, where it is said that the surrogate in that ease appointed an appraiser, “ apparently on his own motion,” and 101 N. Y., where such a course seems to he approved. See, also, Matter of Astor, 6 Dem. 402, and Matter of Wolfe, 137 N.Y. 205" court="NY" date_filed="1893-02-10" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/matter-of-estate-of-wolfe-3608752?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="3608752">137 N. Y. 205. In the latter case (p. 212) the court says that when the machinery of the act is set in motion by the surrogate, either on application “ or on his own motion,” he is at once invested with the office and functions of an ordinary tax assessor. The claim of the executors seems to be based on the words in the section of the statute already cited, which provide for the appointment of an appraiser for the “ property of persons whose estates shall be subject to the payment of -any tax.” In effect, they ask the court to determine that the property is taxable before appointing an appraiser. This determination is the function of the appraiser, subject to the review of the surrogate. See § 232 of the act of 1896, as amd. by § 7 of chap. 284, Laws of 1897. There is-nothing inconsistent with this in Matter of Wolfe, supra, where, at page 212, it is said that the surrogate “ must decide whether the property is taxable, for that fact lies at the foundation of his jurisdiction -and is of the essence of his right to proceed with the assessment.” The surrogate, by appointing an appraiser, is taking the first step prescribed by the act, to the end that he may decide whether the property is taxable. If it is, “ that fact ” is “ the- foundation. ” of his right to assess the same. The general jurisdiction of the surrogate to appoint an appraiser seems to attach whenever the conditions specified in section 229 of the act are present; for example, where, as here, the court had jurisdiction to issue letters testamentary on the estate. Matter of Hathaway, 27 Misc. 474" court="N.Y. Sur. Ct." date_filed="1899-05-15" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/in-re-the-estate-of-hathaway-6149730?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="6149730">27 Misc. 474; Surr. Dec., 1899, p. 196. The foregoing considerations lead me to deny the application, and the order staying proceedings before the appraiser will be vacated.
Application denied and order vacated.