In re the Estate of Lawrence

37 Misc. 702 | N.Y. Sur. Ct. | 1902

Fitzgerald,S.

In passing upon the provisions of the decree submitted for settlement further consideration of the questions to which they relate has led to the modification of some of the views I previously expressed (see 36 Misc. Rep: 275). These modifications will appear in connection with the other matters which I now proceed to dispose of. I have concluded that no»' acceleration of the remainders in the Fifty-seventh and Seventy-second street property, devised after the death of the widow, was effected by her election to take dower, as the persons entitled to such remainders, pursuant to the terms of the will, could be ascertained and determined only upon the death of the widow. And this is so in the case of the disposition in favor of the issue of the son who died after the testator as well as that made for the benefit of the other devisees. The persons who at the time of the death of the widow shall be entitled to'the net proceeds of the sale of the properties would, if the widow had accepted the provisions of the will for her benefit, be entitled to receive such proceeds without abatement or reduction. But the widow having elected to take her dower, and having been paid the value thereof out of the proceeds of sale, the amount taken therefrom should be restored from the income received and to be received from such proceeds during the lifetime of the widow. When that has been done the income of the fund so constituted should be applied, as long as it may "be necessary, but not beyond the lifetime of the widow, toward making good the deficiencies in the legacies caused by the widow’s election to take her dower. The disposition to be made of any of the income that may be received after the making up of such deficiencies is a matter which will be reserved for decision until the occasion arises for the distribution of the same. If the funds in the hands of the executors applicable to the purpose are more than sufficient to pay in full all the legacies entitled to priority of payment over those given by the ninth clause of the will, the balance is to be distributed pro rata among the latter. But if there is an insufficiency to pay the other legacies in full, then the legacies bequeathed by the sixth, seventh and" eighth" clauses are to be preferentially paid in the order prescribed by the will. The estate being over $100,000 above the debts, each executor is entitled to- full commissions. The trust fund of $30,000' for the benefit of Mary O. Sniffen having been set apart and the income thereof paid to her by the trustees, and the principal being now distributable, each of the accountants is entitled to full commissions, both as executors and trustees, on the amount of such principal. Commissions are allowed to the accountants as executors only on the $10,000 given in trust to Joseph B. Lawrence for life, he having died before the same was set apart as a separate trust fund. As to the capital of the several trust funds to be set apart by the decree to be entered, such commissions as the trustees may become entitled to in respect to the same or by reason of their receiving it will be determined on their first accounting as trustees. Dower having been admeasured by decree of the Supreme Court, in an action therein, the payment thereof is not an executorial duty by virtue of the will and no commissions thereon can be allowed. Costs have been taxed. The decree should be modified in conformity with the foregoing memorandum.

Decree modified.