33 Misc. 2d 144 | N.Y. Sur. Ct. | 1962
Probate of the propounded instrument is opposed by the objectant on the ground that a later instrument “ supersedes ” the instrument offered for probate insofar as the disposition of certain real property is concerned, and it is “ either a codicil * * * or some form of inter vivos and immediately effective disposition thereof, or a disposition thereof causa mortis
It is a well-established rule that it is no objection to the probate of a will that the decedent was bound by a valid agreement to dispose of his property in a different manner (Morgan
As the objectant indicates in her memorandum, she is of the opinion that the instrument should be given effect either as a gift causa mortis, or an agreement to make a testamentary disposition. Neither of these issues enters into the conclusion of the admissibility of the instrument to probate. While the two instruments may present problems of interpretation and construction, a construction proceeding must come only after probate has been decreed since unless the propounded instrument is probated, there is nothing to construe (Matter of Miceli, supra; Matter of Lewis, 199 Misc. 463, 465). Accordingly should the objectant not see fit to offer the alleged codicil for probate within the time indicated here, the objections to probate will be dismissed and the propounded instrument will be admitted to probate.