106 N.Y.S. 465 | N.Y. Sur. Ct. | 1907
Frank Wayland Higgins died at the city of Olean, N. Y., February 12, 1907, leaving a will which was duly admitted to probate by the Surrogate’s Court, February
The executors made due application for an assessment of the estate of which the said decedent died possessed, liable to taxation under the provisions of the Taxable Transfer Act, and for a decree fixing such tax. The evidence presented upon such proceeding shows the total value of such estate, real and personal, to be the sum of $839,279.93, exclusive of real estate owned by the decedent outside the State of New York; the deductions to be made for debts, funeral expenses and costs of administration to be the sum of $38,325.59; leaving net value of the estate, $800,954.34. The controversy relates to the liability of the institutions above named to tax under the provisions of the Taxable Transfer Act, the aggregate of the bequests to them being $17,000, and each liable at the rate of five per cent., if at all. The General Hospital of Clean is a corporation duly organized for the purpose of carrying on and maintaining a general city hospital; the Forman Library is incorporated for the purpose of maintaining and conducting a public library; both of these institutions, from the nature of their organization and the method of conducting their business, come directly within the scope of the exempting, provisions of the Taxable Transfer Act. The Western New York Home for the Protection of Homeless and Dependent Children was incorporated January 1, 1878, pursuant to the provisions of the 'act of the Legislature, passed April 12, 1848, entitled “ An act for the incorporation of Benevolent, Charitable, Scientific and Missionary Societies ” and the acts amendatory thereto. Its certificate of incorporation provides: “ The particular business and objects of this society or association are to establish
The work of this institution is charitable in its nature, being largely maintained by gifts and contributions, none of its officers receiving any compensation for their services. It receives and cares for homeless and dependent children, giving them educational advantages along industrial and literary lines, affords them excellent facilities for moral instruction, and eventually secures proper and permanent homes for them; consequently this corporation may very properly be denominated a charitable, educational and religious one.
Under the provisions of the Taxable Transfer Act, as they existed prior to the 11th day of April, 1900, all the institutions above specified were specifically exempt from taxation. On the date last above named the provisions of chapter 382 of the Laws of 1900 took effect. Stock act was entitled “ An act to amend the tax law relating to taxable transfers of property,” and provides as follows:
“ § 2. Article ten of such chapter is hereby amended by adding a section to be section two hundred and forty-three to read as follows:
“ § 243. Exemptions in article one not applicable.—The exemptions enumerated in section four of the general tax law, of which this article is a part, shall not be construed as being applicable in any manner to the provisions of article ten hereof.”
The law relating to taxable transfers of property, as it then existed, was contained in section 10 of the General Tax Law. The Court of Appeals, in construing the amendment of April
The conclusion in the case cited was evidently somewhat reluctantly reached, Parker, J., vigorously dissenting, and Landon, J., in the prevailing opinion, saying: “ The organized, charities and benevolent agencies which actually relieve human misery and labor in unselfish devotion to improve the moral and physical condition of mankind, are alike the fruits and aids of good government, and to exempt their property—usually the, gifts of the benevolent—from the burdens of taxation is scarcely less the duty than the privilege of the enlightened legislator. Clearly this exemption should be placed upon broad, equitable-grounds, quite above the injurious imputations sometimes resulting from individual or special exemptions.”
Nevertheless, it became the law applicable to the provisions-, of the Taxable Transfer Act, and would have so remained had no subsequent legislation ensued. But chapter 368 of the Laws of 1905 took effect June 1, 1905, and, while it is entitled “ An act to amend the tax law, in relation to taxable transfers,” yet-it is, in and of itself, a full and complete Transfer Tax Law, defining with great particularity taxable transfers, establishing the exceptions from and limitations to its operation and the method of assessing estates and determining and collecting-the tax thereon. Section 221 of this act provides: “ But any property devised or bequeathed to any person who is a bishop, or to any religious, educational, charitable, missionary, benevolent, hospital or infirmary corporation including corporations-organized exclusively for Bible or tract purposes shall he exempted from and not subject to the provisions of this act. There shall also be exempted from and not subject to the pro
The enactment of this statute in 1905, the same being in force at the time of the death of the decedent in this case, restores the exemptions which the amendment of April 11, 1900, took away under the construction placed thereon In re Huntington above cited. The institutions claiming exemptions in this proceeding are distinctly within the purview of the exempting portions of the statute quoted. The total tax to which this estate is liable, allowing such exemptions, is the sum of $8,481.35; and a decree to that effect will be entered.
Decreed accordingly.
