History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re the Estate of Eisenfeld
52 Misc. 2d 209
| N.Y. Sur. Ct. | 1966
|
Check Treatment
Edward S. Silver, J.

The court, on its own motion, strikes the objections, which are the usual omnibus objections, to the propounded instrument, as the contestant’s financial interest is the same under the will as it would be in the event of intestacy. *210Section 147 of the Surrogate’s Court Act enumerates the persons who may file objections to a will offered for probate, and the cases construing that section hold that a person, in order to contest the probate of a will, must have a financial interest to protect or stand to gain by the denial of probate. (Matter of Haddock, 22 Misc 2d 694; Matter of Bahrenburg, 200 Misc. 959, and cases cited therein.) Accordingly, the motion for an order of preclusion is deemed academic.

Case Details

Case Name: In re the Estate of Eisenfeld
Court Name: New York Surrogate's Court
Date Published: Dec 12, 1966
Citation: 52 Misc. 2d 209
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sur. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.