In re the Estate of Doyle

95 N.J. Eq. 682 | N.J. | 1924

Per, Curiam.

The decree will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Ordinary Bentley in the prerogative court.

For affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Tren chard, Min-turn, Black, Katzenbach, Heppenheimer, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark—9. For reversal—Kalisch, Campbell—2.

Case Details

Case Name: In re the Estate of Doyle

Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date Published: Mar 3, 1924

Citation: 95 N.J. Eq. 682

Court Abbreviation: N.J.