158 Misc. 93 | N.Y. Sur. Ct. | 1935
The objection to the fees charged by the attorneys for the executors and trustees is overruled. The request of the
Under such circumstances, the decisions hold that where the testator himself has foreseen the situation and anticipated the improvidence or absence of business capacity of a life tenant, who is named as cotrustee, by joining an additional trustee with her, the courts shall enforce the testator’s intention by refusing to permit the administration of the trust by the life tenant alone. In such cases also, where the disinterested trustee resigns or is removed, the courts always appoint a new cotrustee for the protection of the remaindermen. (Weeks v. Frankel, 197 N. Y. 304; Brown v. Spohr, 180 id. 201; Woodbridge v. Bockes, supra; Losey v. Stanley, 147 N. Y. 560; Greene v. Greene, 125 id. 506; Matter of Richardson, 135 Misc. 726; affd., 229 App. Div. 765; Matter of Arnolt, 127 Misc. 579.) That procedure will be made the law of this estate.
Since the widow, Sarah Connolly, is not represented by an attorney upon this contested accounting proceeding, the attorney for the cotrustee is directed to serve a copy of this decision upon her personally and file promptly proof of such service.
Submit decree on notice settling the account accordingly.