In re the Estate of Lupoli
In a proceeding to settle the account of the administrators of the estate of Virginia Lupoli, Marguerite Lupoli appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County (Nahman, S.), dated January 5, 1996, as granted that branch of the motion of Peter Lupoli, a beneficiary of the estate, for summary judgment dismissing her Objections Nos. 1 and 2 (a), (b), (d), (f), and (h), and denied that branch of her cross motion which was for a continuance pending further discovery.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs payable by Marguerite Lupoli individually.
Because Objections Nos. 1 and 2 (a), (b), (d), (f), and (h), involve a controversy between living persons relating to a matter which does not affect the estate, the Surrogate’s Court properly concluded that it did not have subject matter jurisdiction over those objections (see, Matter of Lainez,
To the extent that the appellant claims that certain signatures on the deeds transferring the property were forged, any cause of action based on that claim is also time-barred {see, CPLR 213 [1], [8]; Piedra v Vanover,