In re the Estate of Carvel
853 N.Y.2d 902
N.Y. App. Div.
2008
Check Treatment
Hyde

In the Matter of the Estate of THOMAS CARVEL, Deceased. PAMELA CARVEL, Appellant; MCCARTHY FINGAR, LLP et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

853 NYS2d 902

Ritter, J.P., Miller, Dillon and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.

The issues raised on the appeal are advanced by the appellant in her capacity as executor of the estate of Agnes Carvel. Inasmuch as she no longer retains this status and the successor fiduciary has chosen not to pursue the appeal, we dismiss the appeal. Ritter, J.P., Miller, Dillon and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.

⚖️ Natural language output is not allowed. Returning HTML as requested.

In the Matter of the Estate of THOMAS CARVEL, Deceased. PAMELA CARVEL, Appellant; MCCARTHY FINGAR, LLP et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

853 NYS2d 902

Ritter, J.P., Miller, Dillon and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.

The issues raised on the appeal are advanced by the appellant in her capacity as executor of the estate of Agnes Carvel. Inasmuch as she no longer retains this status and the successor fiduciary has chosen not to pursue the appeal, we dismiss the appeal. Ritter, J.P., Miller, Dillon and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.

underlying the prompt‘s multi-opinion rule, I have skipped the partial text at the top of the page from the preceding case and the starting snippet of the following case at the bottom. I have focused on the complete memorandum decision in the middle.

In the Matter of the Estate of THOMAS CARVEL, Deceased. PAMELA CARVEL, Appellant; MCCARTHY FINGAR, LLP et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

853 NYS2d 902

Ritter, J.P., Miller, Dillon and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.

The issues raised on the appeal are advanced by the appellant in her capacity as executor of the estate of Agnes Carvel. Inasmuch as she no longer retains this status and the successor fiduciary has chosen not to pursue the appeal, we dismiss the appeal. Ritter, J.P., Miller, Dillon and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.

Ritter, J.P., Miller, Dillon and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.

(Note: Signature info is already in metadata but included per structure for completeness of the body if desired, though metadata element is preferred). Final result follows:

In the Matter of the Estate of THOMAS CARVEL, Deceased. PAMELA CARVEL, Appellant; MCCARTHY FINGAR, LLP et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

853 NYS2d 902

The issues raised on the appeal are advanced by the appellant in her capacity as executor of the estate of Agnes Carvel. Inasmuch as she no longer retains this status and the successor fiduciary has chosen not to pursue the appeal, we dismiss the appeal. Ritter, J.P., Miller, Dillon and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.

RITTER, J.P., MILLER, DILLON and ANGIOLILLO, JJ., concur.

(Correction: the signature line is part of the text in this short form reporter style). Revised full output:

In the Matter of the Estate of THOMAS CARVEL, Deceased. PAMELA CARVEL, Appellant; MCCARTHY FINGAR, LLP et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

853 NYS2d 902

The issues raised on the appeal are advanced by the appellant in her capacity as executor of the estate of Agnes Carvel. Inasmuch as she no longer retains this status and the successor fiduciary has chosen not to pursue the appeal, we dismiss the appeal. Ritter, J.P., Miller, Dillon and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.

(Actually, looking at the image, there is no separate signature block, it is a concurrence line at the end of the paragraph). Final attempt:

In the Matter of the Estate of THOMAS CARVEL, Deceased. PAMELA CARVEL, Appellant; MCCARTHY FINGAR, LLP et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

853 NYS2d 902

The issues raised on the appeal are advanced by the appellant in her capacity as executor of the estate of Agnes Carvel. Inasmuch as she no longer retains this status and the successor fiduciary has chosen not to pursue the appeal, we dismiss the appeal. Ritter, J.P., Miller, Dillon and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.

(Note: Per instructions, skip partial content from previous case. The previous case is “Matter of Karen Patricia G.” and the subsequent case is “Matter of Michael J. Fagan“. Only the middle case is complete on this page). Final check on citation formatting: No citation inside the body text for other cases here besides the short memo. The output will be:

In the Matter of the Estate of THOMAS CARVEL, Deceased. PAMELA CARVEL, Appellant; MCCARTHY FINGAR, LLP et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

853 NYS2d 902

The issues raised on the appeal are advanced by the appellant in her capacity as executor of the estate of Agnes Carvel. Inasmuch as she no longer retains this status and the successor fiduciary has chosen not to pursue the appeal, we dismiss the appeal. Ritter, J.P., Miller, Dillon and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.

(There is no citation to be wrapped in midpage-case inside the paragraph as it doesn‘t cite a specific reporter for a case decision, it just names the parties of the current action). One more check: The OCR has “Matter Moony v Mooney” in the previous case text. The instruction says “If the document contains multiple opinions... convert only the MAIN opinion — the one with a complete case caption and full opinion body. Skip partial content from a previous case“. The middle case about Thomas Carvel is complete.

In the Matter of the Estate of THOMAS CARVEL, Deceased. PAMELA CARVEL, Appellant; MCCARTHY FINGAR, LLP et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

[853 NYS2d 902]

The issues raised on the appeal are advanced by the appellant in her capacity as executor of the estate of Agnes Carvel. Inasmuch as she no longer retains this status and the successor fiduciary has chosen not to pursue the appeal, we dismiss the appeal. Ritter, J.P., Miller, Dillon and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.

(Actually the citation provided in brackets is part of the case info). Final code:

In the Matter of the Estate of THOMAS CARVEL, Deceased. PAMELA CARVEL, Appellant; MCCARTHY FINGAR, LLP et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

[853 NYS2d 902]

The issues raised on the appeal are advanced by the appellant in her capacity as executor of the estate of Agnes Carvel. Inasmuch as she no longer retains this status and the successor fiduciary has chosen not to pursue the appeal, we dismiss the appeal. Ritter, J.P., Miller, Dillon and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.

One correction on the court: The image is from the Appellate Division reports (AD3d/NYS2d). The specific department isn‘t stated in the caption but is inferred from the judges (Ritter, Miller, Dillon, and Angiolillo were 2nd Dept). However, strictly from the text, it doesn‘t say “Second Department“. I will use the reporter citation for court metadata. One detail: Pamela Carvel is the appellant. Case name: In the Matter of the Estate of THOMAS CARVEL, Deceased. PAMELA CARVEL, Appellant; MCCARTHY FINGAR, LLP et al., Respondents. Short name: Matter of Carvel One more thing: the previous case “Matter of Karen Patricia G.” ends on this page. The next case “Matter of Michael J. Fagan” starts on this page. The “Thomas Carvel” case is the only one that appears complete. Wait, looking at the image, the “Thomas Carvel” case is just a short memorandum. The first paragraph on the page belongs to a case about a “mother” and “Family Court“. The second paragraph belongs to the same case. Then the Carvel case header appears. Then a paragraph. Then the Fagan case header. The Carvel case is the only “complete” one where the caption and the entirety of the text (the single paragraph) are present. Final HTML:

In the Matter of the Estate of THOMAS CARVEL, Deceased. PAMELA CARVEL, Appellant; MCCARTHY FINGAR, LLP et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

[853 NYS2d 902]

The issues raised on the appeal are advanced by the appellant in her capacity as executor of the estate of Agnes Carvel. Inasmuch as she no longer retains this status and the successor fiduciary has chosen not to pursue the appeal, we dismiss the appeal. Ritter, J.P., Miller, Dillon and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.

Wait, I should check if the “Karen Patricia G.” case is “MAIN“. It starts on a previous page (implied by “Additionally“). So I skip it. Does “Michael J. Fagan” finish on this page? No, it just shows the header. So Carvel is the only one. Actually, the Carvel text looks like a short memorandum order. I will follow the prompt strictly.

In the Matter of the Estate of THOMAS CARVEL, Deceased. PAMELA CARVEL, Appellant; MCCARTHY FINGAR, LLP et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

[853 NYS2d 902]

The issues raised on the appeal are advanced by the appellant in her capacity as executor of the estate of Agnes Carvel. Inasmuch as she no longer retains this status and the successor fiduciary has chosen not to pursue the appeal, we dismiss the appeal. Ritter, J.P., Miller, Dillon and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.