midpage

In re the Estate of Rappaport

New York Court of Appeals
Dec 8, 1982
Versions:58 N.Y.2d 725
444 N.E.2d 1330
458 N.Y.S.2d 911
1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3928

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order reversed, with costs, order of the Surrogate’s Court reinstated and matter remitted to the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County, for determination of the time within which respondent may purge himself of the contempt. Question certified answered in the negative. By contesting the contempt application on the merits and failing to object in a timely manner to the omission of the notice and warning required by section 756 of the Judiciary Law, respondent waived the protections afforded by the statute.

*727Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Case Details

Case Name: In re the Estate of Rappaport
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 8, 1982
Citations: 58 N.Y.2d 725; 444 N.E.2d 1330; 458 N.Y.S.2d 911; 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3928
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In