The correction or modification was apparently made because the respondent believed that the words “ on account thereof” contained in the decree as entered, limited the surrogate, upon the supplemental account directed to be filed by the executor, to allowing such expenses only as related to the interest, income or accretion of the property and prohibited the allowance of any other expenses in the management of the estate subsequent to the- former accounting. If there have'been any. legitimate or lawful expenses incurred by this executor .subsequent to that date, we see no reason why the surrogate should not pass upon them in the supplemental account, nor do we conceive how the appellant.is aggrieved By the order appealed from. Counsel for the appellant seems .to fear that It'was
, All Concurred.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars-costs and disbursements.
