In re the Arbitration between State & Council 82
Appeal from an order and judgment of the Supreme Court (McDermott, J.), entered June 20, 1990 in Albany County, which, inter alia, granted respondent’s cross application pursuant to CPLR 7511 to confirm an arbitration award.
Kingsley Genas was employed by petitioner as a correction officer at Downstate Correctional Facility in Dutchess County. Genas’ schedule required him to work from 3:00 p.m. until 11:00 p.m. for four consecutive days on a rotating basis, followed by two days off. After roughly 18 months of employment, Genas determined that he was unable to continue working his assigned shift on Friday evenings because, as a member of the Seventh Day Adventist Church, he was required to observe the Sabbath weekly by refraining from work from sunset on Friday until sunset on Saturday. After Genas informed his supervisors of his decision, various unsuccessful efforts were made to resolve the matter.
Subsequently, Genas refused to work on three consecutive Fridays in February 1989. On February 25, 1989, Genas was served with a notice of discipline and was suspended without pay, effective that day. Genas then filed a grievance and the parties proceeded to arbitration pursuant to their collective bargaining agreement. Following a hearing, the arbitrator
Petitioner then made application in Supreme Court to vacate or modify the arbitrator’s opinion and award on the ground that it exceeded the arbitrator’s authority under the collective bargaining agreement. Respondent, acting on Genas’ behalf, cross-petitioned to confirm the award. Supreme Court dismissed the petition and granted the cross petition. This appeal ensued.
It is firmly established that an arbitrator has broad discretion to determine a dispute and fix a remedy, and that any contractual limitation on that discretion must be "contained, either explicitly or incorporated by reference, in the arbitration clause itself’ (Matter of Board of Educ. v Dover-Wingdale Teachers’ Assn.,
Clearly, under the foregoing provision, the parties to the contract agreed to limit the discretion of disciplinary arbitra
We reject respondent’s contention that the award was consistent with the arbitrator’s power under the second clause of the third sentence of article 8.2 (i) to "take any other appropriate action warranted under the circumstances”. This clause is modified by and clearly refers to the arbitrator’s powers as set forth in the first clause of the same sentence with respect to determining "guilt or innocence, penalty, or probable cause for suspension”. Therefore, despite the judicial deference generally given to an arbitrator’s award (see, Matter of Town of Callicoon [Civil Serv. Employees Assn.],
Casey, J. P., Weiss, Mikoll and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the order and judgment are modified, on the law, without costs, by reversing so much thereof as confirmed that portion of the arbitration award directing petitioner to allow Kingsley Genas to take unpaid leave for purposes of religious observance; said provision vacated, and, as so modified, affirmed.