History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re the Arbitration Between Benedict & Limited Editions Club, Inc.
265 A.D. 518
N.Y. App. Div.
1943
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The question submitted to the arbitrator was not an arbitrable one; under the provisions of section 1448 of the Civil Practice Act., Accordingly, the Special Term had no power on motion to confirm, such an award or to direct entry of judgment thereon. Only matters which can be made the subject of an action may be submitted to arbitration under that section. It was so held by the Court of Appeals in Matter of Stern (285 N. Y. 239).

By statute, the exclusive method for reinstatement available to the two employees engaged in interstate commerce, allegedly discharged for labor activities, would be upon á proceeding bad before th.e National Labor Relations Board. (National Labor Relations Act, ,§,10,;, U. S. Code, tit. 29, § 160; Amalgamated Workers v. Edison Co., 309 U. S. 261, 266, 267.)

*519The order and the judgment entered thereon should be reversed, and the motion denied, without costs.

Townley, Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ., concur. Order and judgment unanimously reversed, without costs, and the motion to confirm the award'denied.

Case Details

Case Name: In re the Arbitration Between Benedict & Limited Editions Club, Inc.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Feb 26, 1943
Citation: 265 A.D. 518
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.