midpage

In Re the Arbitration Between Cross Properties, Inc. & Gimbel Bros.

New York Court of Appeals
Dec 6, 1962
Versions:12 N.Y.2d 806
187 N.E.2d 129
236 N.Y.S.2d 61
1962 N.Y. LEXIS 846

Lead Opinion

Order and judgment affirmed, with costs.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster. Judge Fuld dissents in the following opinion:






Dissenting Opinion

Fuld, J. (dissenting).

In view of the fact that an award made by arbitrators is well-nigh conclusive, the courts must be especially careful, when the impartiality or objectivity of an arbitrator, appointed as a neutral, is challenged, to make certain that there were no undisclosed disqualifying relationships between such arbitrator and a party which might have prevented-him from rendering an unprejudiced or independent decision. This has been a long-drawn-out, complicated and expensive proceeding, but I do not see how, if the integrity of the arbitral process is to be assured, we may uphold the determination made in this case. I would, therefore, reverse the order and judgment appealed from and vacate the award for the reasons stated by Justice Valente in his dissenting opinion below.

Order and judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: In Re the Arbitration Between Cross Properties, Inc. & Gimbel Bros.
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 6, 1962
Citations: 12 N.Y.2d 806; 187 N.E.2d 129; 236 N.Y.S.2d 61; 1962 N.Y. LEXIS 846
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In