284 A.D. 834 | N.Y. App. Div. | 1954
Decree insofar as appealed from reversed on the law and facts, with costs to all parties filing briefs payable out of the estate, and proceeding remitted to the Surrogate of Erie County for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum. Memorandum: The main subject of the controversy presented on this appeal involves paragraph “EIGHTH” of the will of decedent. The Surrogate has held the trust set up by said paragraph to be invalid. We reach a contrary conclusion. The trust is one exclusively as to personalty, “the money in the bank”, and, therefore, is not subject to the limitation of section 96 of the Real Property Law, but is such as may be created for any purpose not unlawful subject only to the law of perpetuity. (Gilman v. Reddington, 24 N. Y. 9, 12; Cochrane v. Schell, 140 N. Y. 516, 534.) There are present here (1) a designated beneficiary, (2) a designated trustee not the beneficiary, (3) an identifiable fund or other property, and (4) the actual delivery of the fund or other property to the trustee with the intention of passing legal title thereto to him as trustee. These constitute the elements necessary to create a valid trust of this personalty. (Brown v. Spohr, 180 N. Y. 201, 209.) It is quite apparent that the testator in the. instant case intended both the interest and principal, “all the money in the bank”, to be used for the payment of taxes and repairs of the real property, the use and profits of which by the “ SECOND ” paragraph of decedent’s will was given to the widow during her lifetime, to the extent that such personal property would pay such. The clause “ help pay taxes ”, in our judgment, is meant to indicate that the trust fund created by paragraph “EIGHTH” is to be used to its fullest extent for such purposes with the possibility that all of such fund may be used therefor before the widow’s death. This seems to accord with decedent’s intention in providing for his widow during the remaining portion of her life.