History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re the Accounting of Green
112 N.E.2d 774
NY
1953
Check Treatment

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by the addition of the following: Questions under the Federal Constitution were presented and necessarily passed upon by the Court of Appeals, viz., whether section 269 of the Surrogate’s Court Act as here applied violated (1) article VI, clause 2, (2) article I, section 8, clause 3, (3) article II, section 2, clause 2, of the Federal Constitution, or (4) deprived appellant of property without due process in derogation of the Fourteenth Amend*692ment of the Constitution. The Court of Appeals decided that that statute, as here invoked, did not violate any of the above provisions of the Constitution. [See 305 N. Y. 148.]

Case Details

Case Name: In re the Accounting of Green
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 16, 1953
Citation: 112 N.E.2d 774
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.