In five related child protective proceed
Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the appellant’s contentions, the Family Court did not make inappropriate use of judicial notice during the appellant’s parental termination proceeding. It was within the court’s power to take such notice of its own prior proceedings (see, CPLR 4511; Matter of Justin EE.,
Contrary to the appellant’s contention, he was not denied the effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Satterfield,
The appellant’s remaining contention is without merit. Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Thompson and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
