History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Tenace
234 A.D.2d 722
N.Y. App. Div.
1996
Check Treatment
—White, J.

Appeal from an amended order of the Family Court of Schenectady County (Griset, J.), entered January 24, 1996, which denied petitioner’s motion to vacate a prior order adjudicating him to be a juvenile delinquent.

Fourteen years after an order was entered adjudicating petitioner a juvenile delinquent, he moved to vacate it. Family Court denied the motion on the ground that the time to appeal had expired.

We affirm, but on a different ground. While the right to seek *723legal redress is broad, it is not without limitations. One limitation is that a party cannot unreasonably and inexcusably delay in seeking relief to the prejudice of the opposing party (see, Matter of Schulz v State of New York, 81 NY2d 336, 348). In this instance, as petitioner has offered no explanation for his delay which was inherently prejudicial to respondent, the denial of his motion was justified (see, 75 NY Jur 2d, Limitations and Laches, § 336, at 541).

Mikoll, J. P., Casey, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the amended order is affirmed, without costs.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Tenace
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 12, 1996
Citation: 234 A.D.2d 722
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.