History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re Stovall
1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 1038
| Cal. Ct. App. | 1934
|
Check Treatment

Petitioner was regularly bound over to the superior court for trial for pandering. [1] He complains to this court that there was not sufficient evidence produced at the hearing to legally justify his being held for trial.

There is sufficient evidence to justify the belief that such a crime was committed in his residence. There is evidence of his implication and knowledge.

The writ is discharged.

Craig, J., and Archbald, J., pro tem., concurred. *Page 323

Case Details

Case Name: In Re Stovall
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Jan 22, 1934
Citation: 1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 1038
Docket Number: Docket No. 2493.
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.