in Re Stephanie Rios

Case Information

FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/4/2015 7:00:05 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk

ACCEPTED 04-15-00557-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/4/2015 7:00:05 PM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK 04-15-00557-CV No. ______________ IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS In Re Stephanie Rios, Relator Original Proceedings from the County Court at Law, Sitting as a Probate Court, Starr County, Texas The Honorable Romero Molina Presiding From Cause No. PR-14-016 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS Followed by an Emergency Motion to Abate & Preserve Docket Control Order Flor E. Flores T HE L AW F IRM OF F LOR E. F LORES , PLLC 700 N. Flores St., Ste. E Rio Grande City, Texas 78582 Tel: (956)263-1786 Fax: (956)263-1750 Email: ffloreslaw@gmail.com Attorney for Stephanie Rios, Relator

1

IDENTITY OF PARTIES AND COUNSEL

PARTIES

COUNSEL Relator: Stephanie Rios Flor E. Flores

T HE L AW F IRM OF F LOR E. F LORES , PLLC 700 N. Flores St., Ste. E Rio Grande City, Texas 78582 Tel: (956)263-1786 Fax: (956)263-1750 Email: ffloreslaw@gmail.com

Respondent: County Court at Law, sitting as a Probate Court, Starr County, Texas Honorable Romero Molina Real Parties In Interest: Maria Adriana Flores Gilberto Falcon

T HE L AW O FFICE OF G ILBERTO F ALCON , PLLC 320 Lindberg Ave. McAllen, Texas 78501 Email: gilberto@gilbertofalconlaw.com Roel “Robie” Flores F LORES A TTORNEYS AT L AW 3331 N. Ware Rd. McAllen, Texas 78501 Email: robieflores@att.net

Attorney Ad Litem: Minerva Garza L AW O FFICE OF B ALDEMAR G ARZA AND M INERVA G ARZA , PLLC 200 East Second Street Rio Grande City, Texas 78582 Email: garzalawoffice@aol.com

2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Identity of Parties and Counsel…………………………………………………..…2 Index of Authorities……………………………………………………………...4, 5 Statement of Jurisdiction …………………………………………………………..6 Statement of the Case……………………………………………………………7, 8 Issues Presented…………………………………………………………………….9

A. Did the trial court clearly abuse its discretion when it granted a continuance of the trial, over Relator’s written and oral objections, when Real Party in Interest failed to show good cause? …………………………………….19-21

B. Did the trial court clearly abuse its discretion in granting a trial continuance, over Relator’s written and oral objections, to allow Real Party in Interest to conduct discovery outside the deadlines imposed by the Agreed Docket Control Order, when Real Party in Interest failed to show that she exercised due diligence in utilizing the procedures for discovery afforded by the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure?.........................................................................20-25

C. Did the trial court clearly abuse its discretion when it granted a continuance of the trial, over Relator’s written and oral objections, to allow Real Party in Interest to conduct discovery outside of the deadlines imposed by the Docket Control Order?..........................................................................................26-28

Statement of Facts……………………………………………………………..10-14 Argument & Authorities……………………………………………………….15-28 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………..29-31 Prayer………………………………………………………………………….32-33 Certificate of Compliance………………………………………………………...34 Certificate of Service……………………………………………………………...35 Appendix………………………………………………………………………36-37

3

INDEX OF AUTHORITIES

Case Law Pages Coker v. Coker , 650 S.W.2d 391, 393 (Tex. 1983)……………………….15, 18, 26 CSR Ltd. v. Link , 925 S.W.2d 591, 596 (Tex. 1966)……………………………...15 Fritsch v. J.M. English Truck Line, Inc. , 151 Tex. 168 (Tex. 1952)...........16, 17, 20 Gabaldon v. General Motors Corp. , 876 S.W.2d 367, 370

(Tex.App.—El Paso, 1993…………………………………………………24 Gen. Motors Corp. v. Gayle , 951 S.W.2d 469, 477 (Tex. 1997)…………………16 In re Ford Motor Co., 988 S.W.2d 714, 721 (Tex. 1998)………………………...16 In re H & R Block , 159 S.W.3d 127, 132 (Tex. App. Corpus Christi 2004)……...16 In re Luna , 12-07-00185-CV (Tex.App.—Tyler, 2007)……………...16, 19, 21, 22 In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 13536 (Tex. 2004) …………………15 In re Van Waters & Rogers, Inc., 145 S.W.3d 203, 210-11 (Tex.2004)……….....16 Johnson v. Fourth Court of Appeals , 700 S.W.2d 916, 917 (Tex. 1985)…………15 Lopez v. Munoz, Hockema & Reed, L.L.P. , 22 S.W.3d 857, 861 (Tex. 2000)..18, 26 MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Texas Utilities Elec. Co. ,

995 S.W.2d 647, 650-51 (Tex. 1999)………………………………………26 Nat’l Union Fire Ins., Co. v. CBI Indus., Inc., 907 S.W.2d 517, 520 (Tex. 1995)………………………………………………………...18, 26 Sanchez v. Duke Energy Field Services, Inc. , No. 04-05-00926-CV, 2006 WL 2546365, at 2 (Tex.App.—San Antonio Sept. 6, 2006)…………………………...18, 26, 27

State v. Crank , 666 S.W.2d 91, 94 (Tex. 1984)……………………………….16, 20 4 State v. Wood Oil Distrib., Inc., 751 S.W.2d 863 (1988)…………16, 17, 20, 21, 25 Villegas v. Carter , 171 S.W.2d 624, 626 (Tex. 1986)………………………...16, 20 Verkin v. SW Cent 1 , 784 S.W.2d 92 (Tex. App. 1990)…………………………..23 Wagner & Brown v. E.W. Moran Drilling Co. , 702 S.W.2d 760,

769 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1986……………………………………...18, 26 Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 840 (Tex. 1992)……………………………..15 Statutes Pages Tex. R. Civ. P. 247……………………………………………………17, 19, 24, 27 Tex. R. Civ. P. 251………………………………………………………..17, 19, 27 Tex. R. Civ. P. 252………………………………………………..17, 20, 21, 23, 24

5

STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION

This court has jurisdiction over this petition for writ of mandamus under Section 22.201 and 22.221(b) of the Texas Government Code. 6

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

The underlying case involves an Application to Appoint Dependent Administrator of the Estate of Artemio Rios, deceased, and an Application to Determine the Heirs of Artemio Rios, deceased. Both applications were filed by Stephanie Rios, Relator and the biological daughter of Artemio Rios.

The cases originated in the County Court at Law, sitting as a Probate Court, of Rio Grande City, Starr County, Texas, in Cause No. PR-14-13 and Cause No PR- 14-16, both styled In the Estate of Artemio Rios, deceased .

Real Party in Interest Maria Adriana Flores filed a Petition for Intervention for Determination of the Right of Inheritance on March 4, 2015, alleging to be the common law wife of Artemio Rios, deceased. Relator disputes that a common law marriage between her father and Real Party in Interest existed. Relator filed a Demand for a Jury Trial solely on the issue of whether a common law marriage existed between Real Party in Interest and Decedent. A Special Jury Trial was scheduled for September 3, 2015.

Real Party in Interest filed a Motion for Continuance of the Trial on September 1, 2015, on the ground that she had not yet had an opportunity to depose Relator, her biological brother and heir to Artemio Rios, and a non-party. Relator objected to those depositions on the ground that the discovery deadlines imposed by the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, incorporated into the Agreed Docket Control

7 Order had expired and objected to the trial continuance by way of argument at the hearing held on September 1, 2015 and the written Response and Objection to the Motion for Continuance incorporated by reference into the oral argument. The trial court granted a continuance of the trial, without a showing of good cause and due diligence, and after several resets at the request of Real Party in Interest over Relator’s objections.

Relator complains that Respondent clearly abused its discretion in granting a trial continuance to allow Real Party in Interest to conduct discovery after the expiration of the discovery deadline and disregarding the Agreed Docket Control Order. Relator further complains that Respondent clearly abused its discretion in opening the discovery period two (2) days before the scheduled trial date to allow Real Party in Interest to take depositions of witnesses when Real Party in Interest completely failed to exercise due diligence in conducting discovery during the discovery period, in contravention to the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure and the Agreed Docket Control Order.

8

ISSUES PRESENTED

A. Did the trial court clearly abuse its discretion when it granted a continuance of the trial, over Relator’s written and oral objections, when Real Party in Interest failed to show good cause?

B. Did the trial court clearly abuse its discretion in granting a trial continuance, over Relator’s written and oral objections, to allow Real Party in Interest to conduct discovery outside the deadlines imposed by the Agreed Docket Control Order, when Real Party in Interest failed to show that she exercised due diligence in utilizing the procedures for discovery afforded by the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure?

C. Did the trial court clearly abuse its discretion when it granted a continuance of the trial, over Relator’s written and oral objections, to allow Real Party in Interest to conduct discovery outside of the deadlines imposed by the Docket Control Order?

9

STATEMENT OF FACTS

Relator Stephanie Rios was the biological daughter of Artemio Rios, deceased. Artemio Rios died as a result of an automobile accident on November 30, 2013. Relator filed a wrongful death suit in Cause No. DC-13-971 in the 381 st Judicial District Court, Rio Grande City, Starr County, Texas. Relator subsequently also filed an Application for Appointment of Dependent Administrator under Cause No. PR-14-13 in the County Court at Law, sitting as a Probate Court, Rio Grande City, Starr County, Texas. [Apx. 1]. Relator also filed an Application to Determine Heirship in Cause No. PR-14-16 in the County Court at Law, sitting as a Probate Court, Rio Grande City, Starr County, Texas . [Apx. 2]. Relator’s wrongful death suit is set for Trial on October 19, 2015. [Apx. 3].

Real Party in Interest Maria Adriana Flores filed a Petition in Intervention for Determination of the Right of Inheritance on or about March 4, 2015, claiming to be the common law wife of Artemio Rios, deceased. [Apx. 4]

Since the Intervention was filed, both cases were set for hearings on Relator’s pending applications and at every hearing set, Real Party in Interest requested a reset by way of oral motions for continuances of the hearings. Relator objected to every reset of the case and the trial court nonetheless granted each request for a continuance. The trial court set the case for a hearing on all pending applications/motions for March 26, 2015. Again, Real Party in Interest requested a

10 reset, and again, over Relator’s objections, the trial court granted the reset and ordered the parties to enter into a docket control order and set the case for trial. Relator filed a Motion to Compel Discovery and after a hearing, Real Party in Interest was ordered to respond to Relator’s discovery by July 30, 2015. [Apx. 5]. Relator attempted to prepare a Docket Control Order, sent Real Party in Interest’s attorney an email requesting tentative trial dates, and counsel never responded. [Apx. 6] Relator filed a Motion for Docket Control Order on June 11, 2015 and said motion was set for a hearing on July 23, 2015. [Apx. 7] On the same date, the parties entered into an Agreed Docket Control Order, which was signed by the Court on the same date. [Apx. 8] Said Agreed Docket Control Order set all the deadlines, including deadlines to complete discovery, as per the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

Relator took depositions of Real Party in Interest and three witnesses disclosed in Real Party in Interest’s response to Relator’s discovery. [Apx. 9] These witnesses were disclosed late and only after the filing of a Motion to Compel. The depositions of the Real Party in Interest and her witnesses were set for July 31, 2015 by agreement of the parties and later moved to August 4, 2015 at Real Party in Interest’s request. Said depositions were noticed after the discovery deadline by agreement of the parties, as allowed by the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, and due to Real Party in Interest’s failure to timely disclose in response to discovery requests.

11 Real Party in Interest for the first time attempted to engage in discovery and sent Relator’s counsel a letter with tentative deposition dates on August 6, 2015, after the expiration of the discovery deadlines as per the Agreed Docket Control Order. [Apx. 10]. Real Party in Interest, however, attempted to set those depositions in the wrongful death case filed by Relator individually and on behalf of the Estate of Artemio Rios, her deceased father, and filed in Cause No. DC-13-971 in the 381 st Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas. Id. Real Party in Interest also filed an intervention in that case. Defendant in Cause No. DC-13-971 filed a Motion to Quash and for Protective Order on the ground that the depositions of the parties noticed by Real Party in Interest had already been taken. [Apx. 11] . Real Party in Interest was notified, and in that case also, failed to exercise due diligence and failed to participate in those depositions. Moreover, Real Party in Interest’s intervention had also already been stricken at the time she noticed depositions of the parties. [Apx. 12]. Real Party in Interest incorrectly claimed in her argument on the continuance of the trial in this case that Relator not only failed to cooperate in scheduling depositions, that said depositions were noticed unilaterally because of Relator’s failure to cooperate, and that Relator filed an untimely Motion to Quash and for Protective Order. Relator denies those allegations as evidenced by the documents attached in Appendix 8 – 11 and in fact, never filed a Motion to Quash and for Protective Order.

12 Real Party in Interest again sent another correspondence attempting to notice depositions in Cause No. DC-13-971. [Apx. 13] . Real Party in Interest noticed depositions for August 25, 2015 and Relator filed a timely Motion to Quash and for Protective Order on the ground that the depositions were noticed after expiration of the discovery deadlines as per the Docket Control Order, that Real Party in Interest failed to comply with the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure in noticing the deposition of a non-party, and that Real Party in Interest failed to comply with the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure in failing to properly schedule depositions in Cause No. PR-14- 16. [Apx. 14]. Real Party in Interest filed Amended Notices of Intent to Depose on August 31, 2015 and Relator again filed a second timely Motion to Quash and for Protective Order on the same grounds. [Apx. 15].

Real Party in Interest filed a Motion for Continuance of the Trial on August 30, 2015, alleging that she had not had an opportunity to depose witnesses. [Apx. 16]. Relator timely filed a Response and Objection to the Motion for Continuance on August 31, 2015. [Apx. 17, 17-A through 17-K]. The trial court set the case for a hearing on Real Party in Interest’s motion for continuance for September 1, 2015. At that hearing, Real Party in Interest urges a trial continuance to allow her to depose Relator and her witnesses and further claims that Relator could not quash the depositions the motions to quash required a five (5) day notice of a hearing on said motions had been filed less than five (5) days of the September 1, 2015 hearing.

13 Real Party in Interest fails to point out that her untimely request to depose witnesses days before the trial necessitated the filing of said motions to quash. Real Party in Interest also fails to point out that she was attempting to schedule depositions after the expiration of the discovery period as per the Agreed Docket Control Order.

More significantly, Real Party in Interest fails to point out that during the six (6) months period since her intervention was filed, she completely failed to exercise due diligence in scheduling deposition or conducting any discovery whatsoever, even though she requested several resets of this case. In addition, when Real Party in Interest, through her counsel, entered into the Agreed Docket Control Order, she was well aware that a Demand for Jury Trial had been made and filed by Relator and that Relator had made at least two attempts to set the matter for trial. After two docket control order hearings, a trial date was secured by agreement of all parties.

14

ARGUMENT AND AUTHORITIES

Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that is available only in limited circumstances. CSR Ltd. v. Link , 925 S.W.2d 591, 596 (Tex. 1966) (orig. proceedings) (citing Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 840 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceedings)). Mandamus is appropriate “only to correct a clear abuse of discretion or the violation of a duty imposed by law when there is no other adequate remedy by law.” Id. “In order to obtain mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy.” In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 13536 (Tex. 2004); Walker , 827 S.W.2d at 83940.

“A trial court abuses its discretion if it reaches a decision ‘so arbitrary and unreasonable as to amount to clear and prejudicial error of law.’” Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 839 (quoting Johnson v. Fourth Court of Appeals , 700 S.W.2d 916, 917 (Tex. 1985). “Appellate courts will not intervene to control incidental trial court rulings when an adequate remedy by appeal exists.” In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 136 (Tex. 2004)(orig. proceeding); Walker, 827 S.W.2d at 840. “But a party will not have an adequate remedy by appeal (1) when the appellate court would not be able to cure the trial court's discovery error, (2) when the party's ability to present a viable claim or defense at trial is vitiated or severely compromised by the trial court's discovery error, or (3) when the trial court disallows

15 discovery and the missing discovery cannot be made a part of the appellate record or the trial court, after proper request, refuses to make it part of the record.” In re Van Waters & Rogers, Inc., 145 S.W.3d 203, 210-11 (Tex.2004) (orig. proceeding); In re Ford Motor Co., 988 S.W.2d 714, 721 (Tex. 1998) (orig. proceeding); Walker, 827 S.W.2d at 843.

The denial of a motion for continuance is an incidental trial ruling ordinarily not reviewable by mandamus. Gen. Motors Corp. v. Gayle , 951 S.W.2d 469, 477 (Tex. 1997). An exception to this general rule occurs when special circumstances are present. Id. Special circumstances are present when other errors exist that are themselves properly reviewed on petition for writ of mandamus. Id.; In re H & R Block , 159 S.W.3d 127, 132 (Tex. App. Corpus Christi 2004, orig. proceeding [mand. dismissed]); In re Luna , 12-07-00185-CV (Tex.App.—Tyler, 2007).

“It is well established that the granting or denial of a motion for continuance is within the trial court’s sound discretion.” State v. Wood Oil Distrib., Inc., 751 S.W.2d 863 (1988) (citing Villegas v. Carter , 171 S.W.2d 624, 626 (Tex. 1986)); State v. Crank , 666 S.W.2d 91, 94 (Tex. 1984). “The exercise of discretion will not be disturbed on appeal unless the record discloses a clear abuse of discretion.” Id. “It is also well established that the failure of a litigant to diligently utilize the rules of civil procedure for discovery purposes will not authorize the granting of a continuance.” Fritsch v. J.M. English Truck Line, Inc. , 151 Tex. 168 (Tex. 1952).

16 “A trial court will not be required to grant a motion for continuance, at the risk of committing error in overruling it, when the allegations in the motion examined in light of the record show beyond cavil a complete lack of diligence…” Id. at 858. “A party who does not diligently utilize the procedures for discovery can seldom claim reversible error when the trial court refuses a continuance.” State v. Wood Oil Distributing, Inc. , 751 S.W.2d 863, 865 (Tex. 1988).

Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 247 further states that “[n]o cause which has been set upon the trial docket of the court shall be taken from the trial docket for the date set except by agreement of the parties or for good cause upon motion and notice to the opposing party.” Tex. R. Civ. P. 247; Tex. R. Civ. P. 251 . The rules further state that “[t]he failure to obtain the deposition of any witness residing within 100 miles of the courthouse or the county in which the suit is pending shall not be regarded as want of diligence when diligence has been used to secure the personal attendance of such witness under the rules of law….” Tex. R. Civ. P. 252 . Rule 252 further requires that “if a continuance is sought to depose a witness, the motion must include the following information: 1.) the witness’s name and address (street, county, and state of residence); and 2.) a description of the testimony the witness will probably give and what the party expects the testimony to prove. Id.

Agreed docket control orders are governed by contract principles. “When a contract is not ambiguous, the construction of the written instrument is a question of 17 law for the court that is reviewed de novo .” MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Texas Utilities Elec. Co. , 995 S.W.2d 647, 650-51 (Tex. 1999); Coker v. Coker , 650 S.W.2d 391, 393 (Tex. 1983). “Whether a contract is ambiguous is a question of law that must be decided by examining the contract as a whole in light of the circumstances present when the contract was entered.” Nat’l Union Fire Ins., Co. v. CBI Indus., Inc., 907 S.W.2d 517, 520 (Tex. 1995); Sanchez v. Duke Energy Field Services, Inc. , No. 04-05-00926-CV, 2006 WL 2546365, at 2 (Tex.App.—San Antonio Sept. 6, 2006, pet. denied); see also Wagner & Brown v. E.W. Moran Drilling Co. , 702 S.W.2d 760, 769 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1986, no writ)(court must determine from expressions used in a written contract whether there has been a meeting of the minds). “If a written contract is worded so that it can be given a definite or certain legal meaning, then it is unambiguous .” Nat’l Union Fire Ins. Co. , 907 S.W.2d at 520; Coker , 650 S.W.2d at 393. “An ambiguity does not arise simply because the parties offer forceful and diametrically opposing interpretations.” Lopez v. Munoz, Hockema & Reed, L.L.P. , 22 S.W.3d 857, 861 (Tex. 2000); Sanchez , 2006 WL 2546365 at 2. “Rather, a contract is ambiguous only if two or more reasonable interpretations are genuinely possible after application of the pertinent rules of interpretation to the face of the instrument.” Sanchez , 2006 WL 2546365 at 2.

18 I. Real Party in Interest Failed to Show Good Cause “A continuance shall not be granted except for sufficient cause supported by affidavit, or by consent of the parties, or by operation of law.” In Re Luna , 12-07- 00185-CV (Tex.App.—Tyler, 2007). Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 247 further states that “[n]o cause which has been set upon the trial docket of the court shall be taken from the trial docket for the date set except by agreement of the parties or for good cause upon motion and notice to the opposing party.” Tex. R. Civ. P. 247; Tex. R. Civ. P. 251 .

Relator contends that Real Party in Interest’s motion for continuance and her argument at the hearing on said motion are devoid of any showing of good cause. In her motion, Real Party in Interest simply states that “counsel has previously noticed the opposing parties in this case, and they improperly quashed the depositions…” The verified affidavit attached to her motion for continuance is also devoid of any reason, justification or ground which constitutes good cause for the granting of a continuance. What Real Party in Interest fails to state in her motion is that she was attempting to schedule depositions just days before the scheduled trial and past the expiration of the discovery deadlines as per the Agreed Docket Control Order. Absent an agreement between the parties to allow for depositions past the expiration of discovery deadlines, Real Party in Interest was required to show good cause for a continuance, which she failed to do. Relator further contends that Real Party in

19 Interest could not show good cause for the granting of a continuance when Real Party in Interest had already unreasonably delayed the proceedings by requesting resets over Relator’s objections, all of which were granted by the trial court, also absent good cause.

II. Real Party in Interest Failed to Exercise Due Diligence “It is well established that the granting or denial of a motion for continuance is within the trial court’s sound discretion.” State v. Wood Oil Distrib., Inc., 751 S.W.2d 863 (1988) (citing Villegas v. Carter , 171 S.W.2d 624, 626 (Tex. 1986)); State v. Crank , 666 S.W.2d 91, 94 (Tex. 1984). “The exercise of discretion will not be disturbed on appeal unless the record discloses a clear abuse of discretion.” Id.

“A trial court will not be required to grant a motion for continuance, at the risk of committing error in overruling it, when the allegations in the motion examined in light of the record show beyond cavil a complete lack of diligence…” Id. at 858. “A party who does not diligently utilize the procedures for discovery can seldom claim reversible error when the trial court refuses a continuance.” State v. Wood Oil Distributing, Inc. , 751 S.W.2d 863, 865 (Tex. 1988).

“The failure to obtain the deposition of any witness residing within 100 miles of the courthouse or the county in which the suit is pending shall not be regarded as want of diligence when diligence has been used to secure the personal attendance of such witness under the rules of law….” Tex. R. Civ. P. 252 . Rule 252 further

20 requires that “if a continuance is sought to depose a witness, the motion must include the following information: 1.) the witness’s name and address (street, county, and state of residence); and 2.) a description of the testimony the witness will probably give and what the party expects the testimony to prove. Id.

In Wood , Wood asked for a continuance “[o]n the morning of the trial…to obtain additional time to take depositions of the State’s witnesses….” State v. Wood Oil Distrib., Inc. , 751 S.W.2d 863 (Tex. 1988). “Wood also sought the continuance in order to discovery more detailed information from the State….” Id. Wood had not conducted discovery during the two years in which suit was pending. Id. The Supreme Court held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion because Wood did not prove diligence. Id. The Court said that Wood’s inability…to take the deposition of State’s witnesses was ‘a predicament of its own making.’ Id. The Court further stated “that is a risk Wood took by not diligently pursuing discovery .” Id. “To reward such conduct with a new trial is manifestly improper.” Id .

Moreover, in Luna , a trial was scheduled for May 21, 2007 by Agreed Docket Control Order. In Re Luna , 12-07-00185-CV (Tex.App—Tyler, 2007). On May 4, 2007, Luna filed a motion for continuance of the trial “requesting that the trial be continued for sixty days because she needed additional time…to obtain deposition testimony ...to obtain precise details concerning the nature, depth, and breadth of the operational agreement in effect at the time of this incident….” Id. A hearing was

21 held on May 15, 2007, and the trial court denied said motion. Id. Luna [sought] “’mandamus relief from the respondent trial court’s denial of her motion for continuance’….[and] ‘also filed a motion for an emergency stay of all proceedings pending…disposition of her petition.’” Id. The Court denied mandamus relief and held that “the record does not affirmatively show the diligence necessary for Luna to obtain a continuance to conduct additional discovery.” Id.

Realtor contends that Real Party in Interest has failed to show any exercise of due diligence on her part to engage in discovery. Real Party in Interest’s motion for continuance fails to emphasize that she failed to engage in any discovery during the pendency of the suit and that on the eve of trial, she attempts to take depositions after expiration of the discovery deadlines. Like in Luna , Real Party in Interest has failed to show due diligence in utilizing the discovery procedures afforded to all parties by the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. Moreover, also like in Luna , Relator contends that the record in this case does not affirmatively show the diligence necessary for Real Party in Interest to obtain a continuance to conduct additional discovery.

Additionally, Relator contends that Real Party in Interest’s motion for continuance should have been denied because in addition to failing to show good cause and due diligence, her motion for continuance is not in substantial compliance with Rule 252, which requires that “when requesting additional time for discovery, a party must fulfill six requirements under oath: 1.) the testimony is material; 2.)

22 proof of materiality; 3.) show of diligence; 4.) cause of failure, if known; 5.) evidence not available; 6.) continuance is not for delay only but so that justice be done. Tex. R. Civ. P. 252 ; Verkin v. SW Cent 1 , 784 S.W.2d 92 (Tex. App. 1990). Real Party in Interest counsel filed a motion for continuance and attached an affidavit to said motion. In his affidavit, Real Party in Interest’s counsel simply states “I am hereby acquainted with the facts stated in the Motion for Continuance.” The motion itself states that “counsel has previously noticed the opposing parties in this case, and they improperly quashed the depositions…” It further states that “depositions are scheduled for September 1, 2015 at 9:00 a.m.; 10:30 a.m. and 1:30 p.m.” Relator filed a written response and objection to Real Party in Interest’s motion for continuance, and incorporated written arguments into oral arguments at the hearing on said motion, controverting the statements in the motion and objecting to its non- compliance with the rules. Relator contends that Real Party in Interest failed to comply with Rule 252 in that she has completely failed to show that she exercised due diligence in trying to obtaining depositions and conduct any discovery within the six (6) months that her intervention had been pending; has failed to completely state a cause for her failure to do so; has failed to show that evidence was not available during that time; and has failed to show how her request for a continuance is for anything other than to delay the case, an impermissible attempt to obtain evidence and conduct discovery past the discovery deadlines, and cause prejudice to

23 Relator. Real Party in Interest has further failed to state in her motion for continuance “the type of information sought” in the depositions she attempts to notice. Gabaldon v. General Motors Corp. , 876 S.W.2d 367, 370 (Tex.App.—El Paso, 1993, no writ). In fact, Real Party in Interest’s motion for continuance is devoid of any of the information required by Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 252. The strict requirements of Rule 252 clearly state that ‘if a continuance is sought to depose a witness, the motion must include…’ the above stated requirements. Tex. R. Civ. P. 252. The language in Rule 252 is mandatory, and Real Party in Interest’s motion for continuance does not satisfy those mandatory requirements. Most importantly, Real Party in Interest’s motion for continuance also fails to state that the discovery period had expired at the time she attempted to schedule depositions.

Real Party in Interest’s motion for continuance is devoid of any showing of due diligence in procuring depositions of witnesses in this case. In fact, Real Party in Interest has failed to satisfy the requirement and describe the attempts she has made in a period of six (6) months to secure discovery of evidence. Rule 247 further imposes mandatory language when a party moves for a trial continuance to conduct discovery. Rule 247 specifically requires that Real Party in Interest show good cause and due diligence, none of which Real Party in Interest showed in her motion for continuance or argument at the hearing on said motion. Real Party in Interest’s only argument in her attempt to show good cause was that she had not taken depositions

24 yet. However, Real Party in Interest failed to emphasize that her attempts to depose witnesses were all made after the expiration of the discovery deadlines. Real Party in Interests attempts to show due diligence was to produce correspondence and emails showing her attempts to notice depositions, but Real Party in interest also failed to emphasize that the correspondence and email sent were for attempts to schedule depositions in a case not before the Probate Court, and most importantly, also beyond the Docket Control Order and the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure deadlines. Real Party in Interest attempts to show good cause and due diligence in scheduling depositions within a week from the scheduled Trial . Real Party in Interest’s failure to conduct discovery and take depositions was not the result of accident or mistake, but rather the result of conscious indifference. Relator has no adequate remedy at law because the trial court’s order opening discovery two (2) days before the scheduled trial and clearly way past the expiration of the discovery deadlines now subject Relator and her witnesses that Real Party in Interest could have taken during the six-month period from the filing of the petition in intervention to the date of trial. “A party who does not diligently utilize the procedures for discovery can seldom claim reversible error when the trial court refuses a continuance.” State v. Wood Oil Distributing, Inc. , 751 S.W.2d 863, 865 (Tex. 1988).

25 III. Agreed Docket Control Order Agreed docket control orders are governed by contract principles. “When a contract is not ambiguous, the construction of the written instrument is a question of law for the court that is reviewed de novo .” MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Texas Utilities Elec. Co. , 995 S.W.2d 647, 650-51 (Tex. 1999); Coker v. Coker , 650 S.W.2d 391, 393 (Tex. 1983). “Whether a contract is ambiguous is a question of law that must be decided by examining the contract as a whole in light of the circumstances present when the contract was entered.” Nat’l Union Fire Ins., Co. v. CBI Indus., Inc., 907 S.W.2d 517, 520 (Tex. 1995); Sanchez v. Duke Energy Field Services, Inc. , No. 04-05-00926-CV, 2006 WL 2546365, at 2 (Tex.App.—San Antonio Sept. 6, 2006, pet. denied); see also Wagner & Brown v. E.W. Moran Drilling Co. , 702 S.W.2d 760, 769 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1986, no writ)(court must determine from expressions used in a written contract whether there has been a meeting of the minds). “If a written contract is worded so that it can be given a definite or certain legal meaning, then it is unambiguous .” Nat’l Union Fire Ins. Co. , 907 S.W.2d at 520; Coker , 650 S.W.2d at 393. “An ambiguity does not arise simply because the parties offer forceful and diametrically opposing interpretations.” Lopez v. Munoz, Hockema & Reed, L.L.P. , 22 S.W.3d 857, 861 (Tex. 2000); Sanchez , 2006 WL 2546365 at 2. “Rather, a contract is ambiguous only if two or more reasonable interpretations are genuinely possible after application of the

26 pertinent rules of interpretation to the face of the instrument.” Sanchez , 2006 WL 2546365 at 2.

Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 247 further states that “[n]o cause which has been set upon the trial docket of the court shall be taken from the trial docket for the date set except by agreement of the parties or for good cause upon motion and notice to the opposing party.” Tex. R. Civ. P. 247; Tex. R. Civ. P. 251 .

Real Party in Interest filed her Petition in Intervention six (6) months prior to the date of the scheduled Trial. Real Party in Interest joined in the Agreed Docket Control Order setting the case for Trial on September 3, 2015. It is significant to emphasize that the Agreed Docket Control Order was entered into after the second request for a docket control order by Relator. Approximately two (2) months passed between the first hearing on Relator’s Motion for Docket Control Order and the second. During that period of time, Real Party in Interest failed to engage in absolutely any discovery. On July 23, 2015, the Agreed Docket Control Order was executed by all parties and signed by the Court. During the period of time between the filing of the intervention and the trial, Real Party in Interest failed to conduct any discovery. On the eve of trial, Real Party in Interest attempted to notice depositions, after the discovery deadlines have passed, and without proving any due diligence in attempting to conduct discovery or procure depositions of the witnesses.

27 Relator contends that principles of contract apply to the Agreed Docket Control Order executed between the parties. That agreement clearly states that all deadlines, including the deadline to complete discovery, were set as per the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. The Texas Rules are very clear that discovery begins on the date the suit is filed up to thirty (30) days before trial. There is no ambiguity in the Agreed Docket Control Order executed between the parties and no reason for the agreement of the parties to be undone by the trial court or Real Party in Interest. The trial court provided no justification for undoing the agreement of the parties and opening the discovery deadline to allow Real Party in Interest to take depositions just days before the scheduled trial, especially when the agreement governs the deadlines in this case. Relator contends that the trial court clearly abused its discretion in opening the discovery deadlines in contravention to valid Agreed Docket Control Order and further in rewarding Real Party in Interest with the opportunity to take depositions after expiration of the discovery deadlines, when Real Party in Interest failed to show good cause and due diligence. The trial court’s actions in ignoring the docket control order are in contravention with the rules of law and applicable case law, and constituted a clear abuse of discretion.

28

CONCLUSION

The trial record is clear that Real Party in Interest intervened in the probate matters and did absolutely nothing after the intervention. Real Party in Interest claims to have been the common law wife of Artemio Rios, decedent, and not only has she failed to produce any evidence or substantial witnesses to support her claim, but has also engaged in zero discovery. Real Party in Interest, during the six-months period she has been in this litigation, has done nothing other than request reset after reset, and after agreeing to a trial date, files a Motion for Continuance of the trial just five (5) days before the trial is set to begin, claiming she hasn’t had the “opportunity” to depose Relator and some of her witness. It was not Real Party in Interests lack of opportunity to depose, but an absolute lack of due diligence on her party. The Texas Rules are very clear that discovery begins on the date the suit is filed up to thirty (30) days before trial. On the eve of trial, Real Party in Interest tries to come up with some evidence, through depositions, to prove her claim. With the assistance of the trial court, Real Party in Interest was given yet another opportunity to do the work she should have done during the discovery period. Both Real Party in Interest and the trial court have completely ignored the fact that the parties agreed to the Docket Control Order and that that Order and the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure are clear as to the discovery deadlines. Real Party in Interest’s

29 failure to diligently utilize the procedures for discovery disprove any attempted showing of good cause for the granting of a trial continuance to conduct discovery.

Relator will be prejudiced by the granting of a continuance in this case because the trial court not only gave Real Party in Interest even more time but most significantly, has allowed Real Party in Interest to do the work that she should have done to prove her case within the deadlines imposed by the Agreed Docket Control Order. Real Party in Interest has had more than sufficient time to conduct discovery and obtain evidence to prove her alleged claim of common law and has failed to do so. Relator contends that the trial court abused its discretion in granting the trial continuance and opening discovery to allow Real Party in Interest to take depositions and attempt obtain evidence to prove her claim of common law marriage, essentially shifts the burden to Relator to disprove the claim. Relator has been diligent in conducting discovery, secured evidence, and procured witnesses to dispute Real Party in Interest’s alleged claim of common law marriage to Relator’s deceased father while Real Party in Interest has caused nothing but delays in these proceedings and has failed to do anything to prove her alleged claim of common law marriage.

By granting the trial continuance, the trial court has allowed Real Party in Interest to bypass the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure and the Agreed Docket Control Order, giving her the opportunity to obtain evidence to prove her case, when she has displayed a complete lack of diligence in doing so within the deadlines imposed by

30 the rules. The trial court’s action clearly amounts to abuse of discretion, especially when the trial court had previously allowed Real Party in Interest resets of the matters pending before the court to prepare her case. Relator further contends that the trial court’s actions of opening the discovery period to allow Real Party in Interest to take depositions outside the discovery deadlines is not only a clear abuse of discretion but extremely prejudicial to Relator, who vehemently disputes the Real Party in Interest’s common law marriage with Relator’s father and has worked diligently to counter Real Party in Interest’s claim and prepare for trial. To excuse Real Party in Interest’s lack of due diligence and allow her to conduct discovery in contravention with the rules and the Agreed Docket Control Order constitutes a clear abuse of discretion by the trial court. The trial court in its ruling allowed Real Party in Interest to take the deposition of Relator, her biological brother, and a non-party and ordered Relator to make herself and her brother available for depositions on or before September 10, 2015. Relator has no adequate remedy at law and moves this Court for a writ of mandamus to stay those depositions and the trial date rescheduled to September 17, 2015, and directing Respondent to abate all further proceedings in this matter until this Honorable Court rules in this matter.

31

PRAYER

Relator requests that this Court grant her Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Order the County Court at Law, sitting as a Probate Court, Starr County, Texas, to vacate its Order dated September 1, 2015 granting Real Party in Interest’s trial continuance and opening the discovery period to allow Real Party in Interest to take depositions of witnesses outside the Docket Control Order deadlines. Relator further requests that this Court enter an emergency order abating all further proceedings before the County Court at Law and to preserve the Docket Control Order and its deadlines in all respects which was entered by the parties on July 23, 2015, closing the discovery period as per the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure incorporated into the Docket Control Order. Relator further requests that this Court abate the depositions ordered by the trial court to be taken on or before September 10, 2015 and the trial set for September 17, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. until a further date after a decision by this Court. Relator further requests that this Court remand the case for trial without further discovery, and any filing of motions past the deadline to file motions, and for any and all other relief, in law or in equity, to which Relator may be justly entitled to.

32 Respectfully Submitted,

/S/FLOR E. FLORES

Flor E. Flores T HE L AW F IRM OF F LOR E. F LORES , PLLC 700 N. Flores St., Ste. E Rio Grande City, Texas 78582 Tel: (956)263-1786 Fax: (956)263-1750 Email: ffloreslaw@gmail.com Attorney for Stephanie Rios, Relator

33

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.4, I hereby certify that this Petition for Writ of Mandamus contains 4,995 words. This is a computer generated document created in MicroSoft Word 2013, using 14-point typeface for all text, except the footnotes which are 12-point typeface. In making this certificate of compliance, I am relying on the word count provided by the software used to prepare the document.

/S/FLOR E. FLORES

Flor E. Flores

34

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Flor E. Flores, certify that on this the 4 th day of September, 2015, I served, with prior notice, a copy of this Petition for Writ of Mandamus , to all required parties as per the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure and Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, as follows:

VIA HAND DELIVERY

VIA CMRRR NO: 7014 1820 0001 7960 7289

Hon. Romero Molina 504 N. Britton Ave. Rio Grande City, Texas 78582 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL : gilberto@gilbertofalconlaw.com Gilberto Falcon T HE L AW O FFICE OF G ILBERTO F ALCON , PLLC 320 Lindberg Ave. McAllen, Texas 78501 Attorney for Real Party in Interest Maria Adriana Flores VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL : robieflores@att.net Roel “Robie” Flores F LORES A TTORNEYS AT L AW 3331 N. Ware Rd. McAllen, Texas 78501 Attorney for Real Party in Interest Maria Adriana Flores VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL : garzalrawoffice@aol.com Minerva Garza L AW O FFICE OF B ALDEMAR G ARZA AND M INERVA G ARZA , PLLC 200 East Second Street Rio Grande City, Texas 78582 Attorney Ad Litem for Unknown Heir of Artemio Rios, Deceased

/S/FLOR E. FLORES

35

APPENDIX

Application for Appointment of Dependent Administrator Application to Determine Heirship Agreed Amended Docket Control Order – Cause No. DC-13-971 Petition in Intervention for Determination of Right of Inheritance Oder on Applicant’s Amended Motion to Compel Discovery & for Sanctions Email to Real Party in Interest’s Attorney Re: Docket Control Order and late

Discovery Applicant’s Motion for Docket Control Order Agreed Docket Control Order – Cause No. PR-14-16 Amended Notices of Intention to Take Video and/or Oral Depositions, with

Subpoena Duces Tecum of Maria Adriana Flores, Ana Belia Rios, Beatriz Rios, and Felix Rios, Jr.

August 6, 2015 letter from Real Party in Interest’s Attorney attempting to schedule Depositions in Cause No. DC-13-971 Defendant’s Motion to Quash Depositions of Stephanie Rios Noticed by Intervenor Maria Adriana Flores and Motion for Protective Order Order Granting Defendant’s Motion to Strike Maria Adriana Flores Individual Capacity’s Plea in Intervention Letter from Real Party in Interest dated August 18, 2015 attempting to schedule depositions in Cause No. DC-13-971 Applicant’s Motion to Quash Depositions of Stephanie Rios, Artemio Rios, Jr. and Hugo Alaniz, Jr. Amended Notice of Intent to Take the Video and/or Oral Deposition of Stephanie Rios, Artemio Rios, Jr. and Hugo Alaniz, Jr. 36 16. Real Party in Interest’s Motion for Continuance 17. Relator’s Response & Objection to Motion for Continuance (17 and 17-A

thru 17-K) 37 0cloc( MAY 0 I 20r{ IN TIIE ESTATE OF li

RT

s ARTEMIO RIOS, 9 $

SI'ARR COUNTY,TF]XAS

$ TO THE IIONORARLE JUDGE OF COUITT COMES NOW, STEPHANTE LEE RIOS. ApplcanL. ,nd files Lhrs Appticaron ApFoinrmenrofDepsndenr Adjrnj $mlor oa Lhe Flae oI ARTEMIO RloS, Dec.rsld xnd ..use oracr'or wjllshow Lu!o rhrs coun rhe ioltoung: is m individul doniciled in and restding al l8j0 Cuadalupe St, Rio Crando ^. _Applicanr CiLl, Texa 78j82, SlaF Coulr_ Texas, and jj a.r0rg ,n Lhr rnrtrer try and rhroush her dtrt) iullDrized rdrEsenhhe. Thr app|canr r Lhe dccedor\ daugncr drd ha\4n rL.r!{trr rrc cskre ofARTEMTO RIOS, Deceased

Deceden! died on Novenber 30, 201:l h Rio Crdde CiLy. SLan CourLy. Tcx{ ar $eaee ol 19 yeds. Thedcccdenrdied inle$arc

L

This Coun ha j uisdrcrion ord verue isproper because Al.RrrMtO RrOS Deccasrd war doniciled.nd had a n\ed ptace ofEsidcnce in drh.ounrr, r( Lho trDr oi dcrLh h Sr.. CounLv Decedenr owned propeny described gcDerxt ], as real pbper' snh an unknou eilue a( de dme oI tiling tlis applaion Decedem owned propcny dcscribcd Eenemily !s F,:omr propcly wi(h an unknorD wlue aL the rine offitine rhis apptiadon Appr.ur. on beball.of Deccdent, fited a wrlngfLt dsarh slir curcnLly pendoe uDder - Cause No DC-ll 971. in the l8l'L Jndicjat Dhhcr cour1. sLa,r Co!nly, Texas. tor damages ,o excss ofOne Mnlion DoUan ($t,000,000.00)

v, Tle @es, ages, meiul shlus, addre$es. dd Elanon ps !o decedenr of each her ro lhe d@edenL is a follows: STEIHANIE LEE RIOS (razsrle.l Ager l8 Single lElo cuadatupe Sl. Rio Gande Ciry, Tex$ 78582 s@coury,Texas ARTEMIO tuOS, JR. (lb,l 1810 cuadallpe SL Rio c@de CiLy, Texas 78582 SuE Cobly, rexas

u As far a knoq by Lhe aFpLjcanr ar dre riDe ofttrc fi jDe otLh6.ppLtcaLt.n. rh. tiLkNing child *d presuinably bom 6 rtre decedenr. burpaLcnry rsdtrpurert

AMYRTOS

5691Tmpi@St. RioCmndeCiry.TexasTB58z SLacCouhry.Texas

YII,

As te d known by lhe applictur at rhe hre of Lhe fihrg of dns app icatron,.{RTBMIO RIOS, Decedent, w6 neler ndied. Th€ inteEs in Decedenas eslarc requtfes mmed,,le ipFonrmeDr ol.a Dependenr Adm'ntrtra'or ARTEMIO RrOS has died *nho lervnrs a w lt. thc indivrdlalr named jn rh6 applicarion consrirule aU of rhc Decedcnfs hei6 ed disorbules and have lon rn rh6 appncauon ed agree on de advNabiliLy ofhavins a Dependcnl Adnnntsldtron S,l.DpflANtE LEE RIOS has been designard by the known hens aL Iaw otDecedenr 10 se.!e as Dependenl Adminhttsbr. The distribulees reqlesl rhar 0o rcrion be Gken ,n lLls ( o0n on ,e djon @ lhe sedeme offiedecedenasesEcofier rd Lhe rerum ofa. Lnverory,opprarscmenr, and tisrot clains of rhe de@denas cNaLe and se{le all pending clainrs for money dama8es on behalt.of

Decedhas .srsF AI disribLkes join in rhjs rc.lLes ard warve rc issrancc aDd seN,cc of citalion. Allesed heirs &d dinriburees .a Deccdenl whose paremiry is dhplred have bcen seryed w'lh Cirado. rhrcugh pesonat seiviccs Appl'c&l would be a suraote rop.esenlarive, is enLnlcd ro admnxjraLjor and ,5 nor dhqualilied by lowro srve ds aonx.6tErorot dns esate The adhinkrraror ofrtris e$are shou d be siver rtrc l.oltowDrg !olej\: I Tale charge ad possession of DeccdeDas esmle. LnctLLdmg. bd noL Iinrired Lo.

peenar and real popeay Payany dd all dcbrowedbyDecedetrraL the ddreofhhdeah.

2. l

R€piese.r Decedenr in ey and a hrgadon pendingpiorio Decedenfs dearlr RepEseft Decede.t ir hisarion aisjns oul ol.Decedenfs u

-' ed a, Defehdanls $hich inay b.,."". J;::::_Tii":il^ "-".",,". XJ. The adDinisrraroi shoutd be appoinled penaneDr adnrtnrftLor puNrtu ro secroo lllAC) ofrhe Probsle code.

WTJEREFORE,

PREMISES CONSTDDR!]I), s IElllANlt: RIOS. ApptLcror hosn reque$s rhat Cihrion be issued as requifed by la,! aod thar appjtrallr be ]nxncdracty appornLed a Adoinishlor of Decedenf s esrllc. 'IdE LAN FrnM oF t.Lon

PLLC

RiocmndeCiLy, Texas 7s592 Tel (956) 261-t786 Ia\. (956)263 t75.l , +ILED

. |

0r1-0.tsl:M

r,raY 2 8 20v1 $ TN TIIE C COURT IN TEE ESTATE OF s s AT L^W Or ARTEMO RIOS, s $ STARR COUNTY, TEXAS

.A.PPLICATION TO DEIERM]NE TIEIRSHTP inlnmuon The folding ApPlidL STEPHAITIE Rro9 tumtuhes rh. toUowii€ I aRTEMIO RIoS ("D*edmtl djed on Novmb€! 30, 2013, at tlE aBE oI 39

h FaLon rieighb, StaE C@ty, T€s. ation uPon D4€d6(s 6tate ji Fndmg beioE Lhs 2, A D€p4dmt court udd c:]G Nd PR-1!r3, stJba tu th. Est4t of '(,tm to Rios Ii i' in tlE hst inssl ol rhe Estate ior L\e Courr b detemine who N rhe heirs and orny hei6 of the

3, Appliat claiN |o be the owr o! aI d a Paft or D(edstr Estak nE la5l Lhc {iigjls of t]le smial suty nubq ol 033 Tlt lst rlte digrs of hd Tdas Identin@tion cd.l de 16? Th€ lrdo ed Fsid6.5 of all or Dfr€dent s heus, tlE relatioch]P oI eacl

4 her b Ddedmi dd dE he intere* of Bre APPIidt and of each ol the hei6 in the EstaE of De.edstft d follosl

ARTEMIO RIOS, JL Rjo Grdde Cirt, Td6 78s82

Shat of Real PmPeny Shd of Pqsn l PloP€rtY:

Rio cdde Gry, TM 745e2 D'c6l I. ttu eshkalAei ^@ \

\:0

CAUSE NO, DC-13-9?l I{UGO AI,ANIZ JR., STEPIIANIE RIOS IN TIIE DISTRICT COURT 6 d ARTEMIO RIOS, JR, Ibdividurlly lnd s Oa h.U of ti. Esrar. of ARTEMIO RIOS, I Praintillr, s s $ s

JOANN GONZAj f,Z md s TLAMES GONZAIEZ, s $ 38f' JUDICTAL DISTfuCT

AND s MARIA MAGDAI,ENA FLORES, AS NEXT s FRIEND OF AIIfY DEL CARMEN RIOS, A s MINOR CHILD 5 rnletukoFPraintills $ I s 5

ANDERSON COLUMBIA COM}ANY, INc-, s

I

STANR COI,NTY, TEX,AS $

AGREED AMENDED DOCKET CONTROL ORDER

Plointiflss InrePcnos, od Defendd! app.&.d dd alE d, dd rhe coun .nter.n the lollowiDg 1. Jury rel4tioFTri.l: octoberl9,2015 rr 9:00 a.m, 2, Dsign.tioborE p..t: aJ Plaintif*4nre no^; May8,20l5 3.

I3,2015

18,2015

ffisr-?- mrs rt e:oo !.D. 4, Daub.rt/Rob'.&r E€rrtbca (ir fteded): May ll I0,2015 Fiul PFTrtrl Corlft.e PuBu@r lo T.R,C,P. # t66: Oclob.r 3, Arl Motiols n lihine sh,U h.6lcd dd h€.d ot 6nal rl. 6. Tri.l Noteb@ks shall be incompli sth T R C,P, 166, irctudjns sFEiat srcNED AND ORjIER'ED ON rrtrS _Ld,y of _Eq

2015.

LAPFAE&! S,P.L.L.C. 601 Sa$ter StsEt, Suit€ 650 !d: (713)?3910r5 lreiLhab@iohs.com chri{opt'q@oFzcjohB.@d Co

Ploi.r't/ InENetur 0rl30/2dj.6 33Pl 4 AmmdnanrofPrudingr(Pllindfi)r Maylll0,20l5 b) Amendnenr ol Plc.dinss (Dcfqrdmo: Iuty6,20L5 rhrlPrsjl.i!lcoDterence Purruanrtd l.R.C.t,r td6 O.rober J 20ls

5 .lc:00r,n. AllMoions in Linine lhdlbefileddd hddar 6Mt!Etri.L. T.tul Notabooks aE due No (2) wc.k befoe tinal Pe-TrL,l coo cie. Ti,rlNorebook sh'l b. in@mpliatrc w"h T R.C.P t66, inoludingsp@ial

SICNED ORDERID ON THIS t0r5. THE I-AW FIAfi OF IIOR !, 700 N. Flora Srot Sufue E R o Cad! C'ty, Tdas ?3532

s, P.L.t-c Fax. (956) 263'1750 sun.650 ConNel lbr Ptaintilf / ln t

FIRM, PLLC

(e5o 658.3t@ i (956) 66&8101 Kni( D, Willii S

llo,2l64i5oo s

240?0854

, Suile 520 ' (2t4) 736.9t94 6l^",g,JX 9 I]t TIIE COIJ]\TY COIJRT AT LAW II{ TBE FITATE OF $ sor

NRTEMIO RIOS,

$ DECE I) 5 ARRCOt TY, TEXaS PETTTION IN INTERVENTION FOR DETERMINATION OF RICEr OF INEERITANCE tu of InhcdbiE wiL'r tbis Coun 6 e Brh of rhe d@6 ot Andio Rios CDenmr"), and psur to s4rion 2ol .052 of the Texa Bbld codc ed Espedily sbmi6 b llc cout lhc

! Sr@heir Rios ha filed e Applienon to Dclmidc iship in tlis &rion dd my b€ wid nolie ofihi! Pailion in htrmrion by sddin! o 6py ro hd adomcy, FIor E. FtoE,

d700N no Sr., Sr., E, tuo Ctud. Cify, Texs 73532. Arcmio tuc, J. hs 6lcd o Ejvn of ldie olrhc ADpliQlion fil.d by scphmie tu6 fiemayt

*nn rcd* ofrbis !.tirion ir ddon by endrng a 6py b his addcs, l33O GuddlulE Cnok, Rjo CEde City, TX 78582. Any rj6 (r b'niot lhbugh [d n*r 6cDd Mdir Masda]@ Flc ha fital a pcrirron inlnrdenlionofrlcApplidion shc m b€ 3@.d wjth no.i€ of riis p.rition in tnR{rion

Mqi, Ailnua FloFs, is a cidcnr of Se Coury rno r6i at l?2 L4 bbs, Rio Gadc Ciry. TS5e2 hd ha ajdiciabtc lnr.Esr in rfit pftc..ding 6 rh. @hnon t.w wifc oa Aenio tu6 ridd E S Cou(y, Tq6, ud dicd incabre on or aboutNowmh.r lO, 2013. Thar Ais Court ha venue MdjuisdicLion oflhc nader b€@w De.€ie M donioitcd in To ttc howledge ofPeliLionq, lhc decedenL died intcsrat., lcavins no MI.

u. Maie Adri@ Ftor B rtuIty otoift ro bc thc omd of sll or o pelt of D€c€ddrs Esre 6 shc B {'. cl@nt spos. of tf,e d4dhr ar rhc rinc of his denise orhe l]1u this Thc @s ed Esidd@s of 6tl .f Dc.dent s hm, thc Flsrio6hp of eeh hcir lo enr md lnc u!. nl.€r oi rhc Petilrond Md of @h of rhe hei6 in lhe EsEle of Deccddr

dd t[e !!e i. r of rhc Pelirionu ed of @ch of Lhc i.i6 in rho Btob of D.c.de.r @ s

Nme:

Mdia Adrieo Florcs t72tat @ tuo GMdc cit Tx ?35a2

Relatioctupr omon law spow Sh@ofR@lPrcperty ll2 S ofP.6odlProp..tyi l/2 Nmc.

Anehio tuos, J. AddEs- 1830 GDdslupc Circl., Rio cfld. city, Ts 73532

RclalioEhip:

child

Sh@ ofEs.Lp | 16 66% Sha of pson.l pEpertr: 16.66% Nm.: Add : S hdi. Rios

l33O Gu.dalupe CiEl., Rio Gtudc Ciry, T.xa 73542

R.lationship:

child

SbeofFdpmperty: 16.66% s ofFEoMl pFlcny: 16,66% tuo Cftrde City, TeE ?3532 She ofpcFobd pDpcrry: 16 66% taw t Maio Adiida FtoM_ 1lle D.cedent An.dio Rios w6 n@i.d by €nmon Cour! SeCoety, Texs. All knoM chndEn bon !o or odopted b, De@d hdc b€en lisred lsh kbq Euiagc ofDe€ldt na ben ln@d A! olllrcation for indeFld.At rdrinishrio! is p.nding bdor? C.Msdcrti.tu. ClE No B not n nc.t s a parry in trle adninisratior poc€dings. h de €mon la* sifc or dE deedeDt ed h4 slanding s d inEBr.! pdson

wilt be ']|r !trc.lcd by lhc pob61c po6-di!gs. MnaA.Litu!Flo re norlroviden wib noli@ ofde pFbarc F*.dinss ed for good su. deircs ro r. . 6 d ;FE$.d pcmd bd b.

on. of rh. De..dols heiE h lie pFb& pFecdrSs. PRAYER TOR RELIEI Th.t rhc Pctiriolq h aq@ of lne f&15 smeding lhis pelirion od slae lie rollowinEl Ttur Pdition r Equ6l rhis Cod ro Bi.w lnis i

nLion md pdirion md sho d de cou 6rd il !6r.r, ro cntcr llos ordc6 n.@s$ry ed dul6ri*d wirrl ardio{!siD@dridn & LiirioM slat6 tlEt sbc udcEllrd! rhlr by 6lDS ihis peufion ia I cdcnLion tor Pctitond cqu6B rhis Coun dcGtuiE od st hlish who is .nLidci ro dE disiibuhon oa Llrc Coun my d€n Int.denor Mda A<lri&E Flo6 is emittcd b. 'ne tlw Omce olcilbcrb ral@n, PLLC. r@silb.nofrrconrav.com 1956j 6274rs9

Fu. (956) 48?-6336 CERTIFICATE OF SER\,ICE I h. qi9 hrt on Ma!.h 3, 201 5, o nc dd 6rcer @py ot lhc tor.going hs 700 N. FloEs Sdeq Suilc E T.lNu (9t6)263-l?36 Id nmhq (9JO 263- l ?50 AEobey for stcpbmic Rios

l08N.r5d N@h< (95061r{ l2l E@il- drrr McAla IX 71501 T.l NEta (95O 65&8100 rd

(9JO668-3101 E -riathqu Edlwfm.dE No 78582 Tol

O5q 487.6!6t

nubd (956) 437-6336 causE No, PR.1.t4l6 $ IN TgE COIJNTY COURT AT LAW

IN

TEE ESTATE OF s $oF

ARTEWO RIOS, 0 g SIAXR COTJNTY, TEXAS

DECA{SED

STATE OI'TE)Q\S

s !

COIJNAY OF STARR $ *kngc, infomdoa dd h.lict SIjBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME BY Meia Adri@ Floc on '.J . -L,.rq NoEry Publjc. s ofT.x6 PR 14-16 Lilly cuerrero IN THE ESTATE OF S IN THE COUNTY COURT A'T LA\v s

ARTE]IIIO RIOS, I SITTINGAS A PROBATE COLRT

DECEASED

S STARR COUNTY, TE\AS ORDDR ON APPT,ICANT'S AIIENDDD N IOTION 'I'O COTTTEL DISCOVERY 4I D FOR SANCTIO\S On.,uly21,2015,lheCou considered amlcant STDPHANI E RIOS' Amended NIor'o. consrderaron, thc Coun Orde6 6 tblLo{ loCompcl Dscovcry md lor Secuons, and upon 'lue I Mdra Adnana Ilores ed/or adoney G bcno Fahon, dc ORDERED Lo polrde an$\en lo ApphcaDfs Ftrsl SeL oflnlcrcgatones, Reque$s for Admrrons, ed Requcsts tbr Produclron by July 10,2015 by 5 p m

2 lqana Adnxnd Florcs dd/or anorney C'lbe.to Falcon, ate ORDERED to provLde responses lo Applicanas Reques6 for Disclosurcs by July 10.2015 by t p m IT IS FtlRl-HER ORDERED lhaL a Specral Jury Tnal 6 ser for Scplcnber l,2015 aL lT lS FURTHER ORDERED lhar lbe lollowing deposllrons Nrll be hcld as folloss I MdndAdrjanaFlorcsshallappearfotadcposrlrononJulyll,20l5atl000am i!Thc

Ldv Fimr ofFlorE Flores,PLLC, ?00N Flores SL, Sle. E, RioGrdde Crtv.Ter6 7E582 2 Fcl[ Rlos, Jr shalL atpear for a deposlron on July ll. 2015 al I 00 t m d The LaN frnofFlorE Floies, PLLC, ?00 N lloresSl,Ste E, Rro 6mde CiL-v. Texas ?8i 82 I AnaBe|aRros shcllappcar for a deposilron o0 Julyll,2015 al2 00 p h atTheLaN FtrnofFloiE Flores, PLLC,700N Flotes St, Slc E,tuoCrMde C(y, Texd78t82 PF ta t6,t)th. Ede oft4qna Rrc oFDER oN ArplrcaNf \ {n.\D.D rtofl or rocowLL lr6cor.RY & Fo[ sArorors ofFld E. Ilorer PLIC. ?00 N. Ilorcs St, Stc E, Rio Gffide City, T.rc ?8582.

SIGNEDON 015 HON ROMERO MOLINA PRESTDING JUDGE

/fud a,ot tf* tt@io l&isr

,.il

Flor Flo6 <ffloEsl @gmail.com> Artemio Rios Estate FlorFloEs <ffloEsraw@qma't.cofr>

!lbd. May 13,2015 ar 1209 pM ro 's'rb€rto@s b€norarcon aw.com' <s lbeno@gr berroratcontaw.coD 'ambe@! tbe.roratconttu com. <6mbe@q' b€dofarcon awcom> ccr Nad a LA1 <noreslaMssktol@gna lcom>

Oh Apdl 1si, lsenlboth ol you an emaitrequeslinq lenralNe tna dates so we coutd nnatze the Oocket Conrrol OrderrheJudgeinstructed!sloslbmilnrhsmaller.Isn@M6y13thand havenolEcevedacspons," from you. l am requesling one lasl lrhetnaldales n June lrcmyou so can gel lhis casescheduted tr tdont rcceive a esponse, l wjll subm l a Dmkd conlrolord€r wjlhoul you inpul hnk thavewaited tong enouqh Addrl'onally. yourdiscovery €sponses a€ ovedue Pl€ase atlow th's etecllon c corespondenc€

lo setoe as a Iomarcq*sl for€sponses by no lat€rlhan lhe end otlhebusiness day on Monday, May 13,2015 Lftdonot Eceive sad rcsponses I wilL be liling a Ntot on for conlempl and forsanclons. Tnank yN loryour prompt atlenl on 10 lhese malleF li\tt.\4).t LdLttr, knq.\tr^ 2nl| 4tl:t)it The Law Fim of Flor E. Flores, PLLC 7tl0 N.I.lorcs St., Stc. E tuo G.,nde (iio,'le$s 78581 'rer (956)263,1786 |ix: (956)263-1750 \ \ \. fflo.csla\ .com trlo.cnr(@goin.(,m

Fir€d:05111/2015 O NTHEISTATEOF NTHE COU\TI COURT s 5

LAW ^T s $

STAXR COUITTY, TEXAS TO TIIf, HONORABLE JUDCf, OF SAID COURT: coMES \Ow, STEPIId\IE RIOS, rhe Aptlicanr l. Lh s lcion, .nd Rques for a D..keLConrclConfeence, and in suppon dercotwtllsho$ unro lhis Cour fie fotlow'.e: Thh prc.ecdi4 h i conreied mader *heEby rhe Appliconr is seeking b be appoinled rcpresenorive of de Enate ol ARTEMIO RIOS. Applk.nr is lhc biological daugh@r ol ARTEMIO RIOS, dec&$d. MARIA ADRrA\A FloRtrs hd nled an lnrd.dion dajmin! ro b. de common LN wife of ARTE:VIIO RIOS, de.elsed I!,{RL{ ADRIA\A FLORES is

STEPHAME RIOS e reprsenraLile ofAXTEMIO RIOS' 6Ee ThE maoerha be.n pendingsince Mry l,2011. Applimr STEPI{ANIE RIOS hd filcd , J!ry D.mand on ft. isiuc ofcommon lae ndiag! an,l dl plnns app.&ed for a heari.g in Uis man{ on Mrch 26, 201J. The Coln Or!i*e'i lhe panEs ro edr.r rnto a do.ker conml order and seL fte daner for dal. Since L\en. AppLhanr has madr requc$ for Trial dncs from lnr!frcnor's counsel and non hale been

Applica fil.d awonsluldedh cNe on behallofher tarher,ARTtr}rIO RIOS. decs$d rdfie33l'Jud'cioLDudc!Cou(!^deidcsehserlorTdrlonOdobeil9,20l5.Thisnate. thk hadshs ro hsb.enconrinuedon..sdrhepsdiessillnorasreeroflothercontinusce b. (solv.d beforc rhe {rongfuL dedh kial.

Allpanns, indudin8 lnredcnor II{RIA ADRUu\A FLORXS, h6 had sufficrcnr rime Lo ensase in di$ove!- ro finrLize rheprcbale mr(flandprcc.ed 1o rial on th. common Laq issue, which needs o be.esoLved b.forc ihew.onsfuLderfi cssepmceed! ro trial. AppL'chra$.dr dar

5 daJ_s h necesary o prcvent hinh WEI.REIORE, PREnflSES CONSIDERED, STEPdANIE RIOS, Aptlrcml 8bd hrer for Tdal on rh. McriB, md for sny rd ,ll oAd Eli.f, ir lN or in .qunt o which R€pond. n.y b€ jdly en tl.d6.

R6F.tflllt $bmille4 TS'L FM OF TqNR E. FLONES' TLLC 700 N FloG st, St E tuo CFndc CirY, TerG 73512 T.L(956)261_l?36 Fq: (95O 26r_ 1750 EFAiI: Bv, /gFLOR f,. FLORFI

9EBrgre4x!-9rs!8ucE I, Flor E Flor.., by cdiry $don lhis rtE!:!9 d.v of rue 2015 d de ad codt copv

]I!A.EMA!,I

v!A-E!4Ae: VI-{ ELECTRONIC FILINCi TH' LAW OFTICE OF GILAERTO FAICON' PLIT McAIl.n, Tcxa 73501 )turvrJor ltuenent Mo'o A.lrino Ftotu!

1t!!!o8-E MBES-- ft ?Nr4t6t h tu tud.41d.dp Atq k@dd IN TI1I ESTAT' O}' IN TIII COU\ry COURT s

I I

AX,TEMIO fuOS, s STAIR COU\TYi TEXAS OR'f,ROI AT'PLICANTIS MOTION TO COMPIL & FOR SAIVCTIONS . rhc Coun @nidcr.d App ir&r s Mor on ro Cohp.l& lor Sdflrcns. and aner rcviewing rhc pL*d'ncs and he ne arcu(hrotcouset. rhe coud noalhe opinion rhrl erd morion shoutd bc GIIANTED.

The Coun ORDERS lnrsrenor MARIA ADRIA,\ A FLORi'SI L To P3) Applienr's dromey, FLor!. FtoEs, $e slm ofS7O0.m tor$endccsiq,otntjng

6i5 Morion b Compcl and tor Ssctions on b€hrtfofsTEplll-Vf, RroS. 2. To prcdue dcmenb h Appiitrl s Reqfs tor P,odu on of Deumens s,din five 15)&rsorr h€iis n s ddrcrorby 'h I To p.ovidc resp.nses oAppticdrs Re,]l66 fo.Disct6uEs wnhin five (5) dlts ota ,20r5. .1 To pmvide fs-..e6 F ]\ppticanfs FiNL s.r otlnLerosarnes drhin five (5) da': ofa hqi.g i. rhis msner or by

,2olj.

Ihe coun fuihs oRDERS and mks a Jud'c al findins rhar |ne Admissions *ru.d uno lnrdenor 34 dc.md adhiftd ,nd pEvenr tfledenor tdm presenunc evidcnce ar trnt which conftr.tr nane6 *hich have be€n dehedadmined.

The Coun tunher ORDERS dal: l. Thel cfrcnor r plead in8s be nnck n and LeminoB dny fuans d G.overy b) tncdqor 2. Prchrbir lnrencnor Fom iilFdrcing &y documen6 d dd shich reE equen.d jn

dtrcovq- and noL pnnued. CAUSE NO. PR.I+I6 IIi T}IX ISTATE OF I\ TEf, COUNTY COURT s $ s !

STAITR COU\TY, TXXAS $ ORDIRON A}PLIC{XT'S MOITON I COVPIL& FOR sANCTIONS rhe coln lon'derd qppti!&,3 \ronon b Compeia lor Sandionl' and sner rcvic*idg LhepteadinCs and hlanDgarsmenrofcounset. ge CounEofd. opinron thar said hodon shautd b. C TXD

Thr coln ORDERS tnredenor MARIA ADRIAT\A ILORXSI L rop3) Appliqfsadomcy, FtorE. FtoEs, dcsuD of$700 i]O a.! rh. ieesiryotnting

Morjon b compet and for soc ons on behalfoa sl uHs^rx Rros. 'nh ?. loproduedocMcnb inAppt,.das Rcqusr Iof pnrdua,on or Docunenawj$in fivc T5)&y\ofr heJnng h dris mJnerorby I To pmvide rcsponses b Appliqm s Requcsb tor Dn.lo:ns wd d tjve (5) dals ofa 4 To pmvide ssqcE @ apptrsnrs tri^r ser oa Incnogmrjes

hannsin rhis h,n{ or by The coutr tud\er oItDERs aid maks , ,!dic,l finding rhd dc Admjssions ed unro fcruenor aE demen admrd.d and prve tikdcnor rdm prc*nhnB evidencc d oiat qhich controv.e manen shih hrvc been deem.,l adniien The coln tuahd ORDERS rar. L T]1e Inroenots pteadings h€ erick.n dd r.minatcs dy 6fner djsoverl by rnbn.nor 2. PrchibiL tnuo-e'or trom inhduc,ng my deudenE ar ,nd shhh *eE Equsred in

oKovery od norprcdued SICNEDON: JUDCE CAUSENO, I]Y TIIE ESTATE OF t ARTEItroRtoq I arlAw : - S STARR COTA"TY, TP,JTAS , rhe cou .dnsid..cd Appt,canas Mo.ion b Do.td Contror Conlecne. ft. coud s* mrq aor a he atinE dn Julv 23, 2o1s 'nis s,cNrDon 6/122015 .1l5PLLC .,+.t:;

,

AUG 2 0 2015 PIt-\,.l. \rp

CAUSENO

Cl.r" + i"q* SIARRCOTNry,IE).AS DOC]GT CONTROL ORDER dryol BE REMEMBERiD lnAI ON 201i, ad€kd JurlTialreqEied Yes I)ead ine ro rcqlen foflury:

B. q oO >.d n.a..:,erio. In.l { Pre.Tral6 eEn.e i5 ser for

(Prrr3 Nokbd rmadbo) The dadhne to'fitingaLl disposit' E. The coun will $hedule o hariig oi eid moion, upod de filng df tre. Thededhne forfitiiS: td sposit'\e ,u,nn,D morions herngon e'd morionsupon lhe fihng

,,. rV'f l The deadhne for dcngnarion of expen * ni$ses tor D€fendmt G) TftCP H. The deadL'ne lor desigration ol expen vM6scs lor PlaintifG) is TNI P The dead ,ne ror !omplerion ofdi*o\err for DdcnLlrnr (r) trr [4tp The dsd ror (ompletion ofdb6v!.J rorPtamtifi(,1L 'tu 7-7C P Ih" dtudL'r forn".dnr .or atlp'e.o ng. o hrn frno.nr\.rj '7Aa/ -hedm.'oe ro' amenomel .Irllpl""dns.forh"Ps" r <J. L. M,

tJ n. '//rdr.- TRESID 'UDGE APPROVED As TO rORMr @,<,"1

PLL1

S) ATTOTNEY rlEs TcJ, (r'D 1t7-zt3 t F)x: G5i6) At?-aqoL

cALstrNO. PR-1r-16 S l^_ THE COUTY COURT AT LAlv ]\'I'IIE ESTAI'EOF SIT ING AS A PROBA'IE COLRT lRTETIIO RIOS. ST'ARR COUfTY. TEXAS

DECEASED

ATINDED NOTICE OFI\TDNTION TO'I'AKEVIDf,O AND/OR ORAI' Df, POSTTION. \\'II'H S(IBP@ orlO{ Brllon Avc.R,o CrandeCrl), fcxas 78582 PLEASE T,\KE NoI ICE lh.t, PutsuanL to Rulcs lt9 dnd 201 I offic lcxs Rulei of

c,v Proccdu.e, Appl'cant STEPHANIc RIOS rvilL Gke the lidco and/or oraL dcporlron of iARL\ ADRIANA FLORES od aqust 1, 20I5, .l I l:00 ,.n. Ths deposron w'll Lake p xcc aLThc Lnl lir ofFlor E, Florcs, PLLC,7O0 N.l-to.s St, Sle E, RioCr{nde Citv. Ttxrs ?8582 The deposrion shall conhnue i.orn dat lo da!nnol coDrPleled lhBdcporlron rv'lLhc ralcn b.lbrc a cedrf'cd cor( reponer ruLhonzcd Io adm,nNrcr oafis Tb* dcPosron Nrll be srcnosraphrcdlly reco.ded by a cour rcponcr aulhonzed bt la$ 10 Lake deposnions

PLE,\SE lAKli IL-RTHER }_OTICE lhaL puAuant lo Texas Rulcs ofCnll Procedurc 199 l(.),lhe dcpollron of ll4Rll r\DRl-{l',lA ILORES nrat be raken by lhe non $c.oglaPht neansofay'dcoLap.recordr.g'naddtrronroslenosraPhrcmcans

to arcnd and cxa.u.lhe rYtrnc$ dprescnbed bv tho Tcxas Rules All pinres rr€ 'n!trcd olCruLproceduF and arc fonred thar lLo lestnony dd/or docunrenolion obnin $rllbe $ed rscvrdcncc nlhe tbove rcfcrenced &rron

Plcasc Lakenolr.elh.L Lhc undcrrgned ay ca0se the deFosuonlo be!rdeotaped Pu6u3.l lo Texar RuLe oa Crvrl Procedurc 1992(b), $c foLlowrns books, tapc6

documcnh, dd lingrble lhrng,s (bcrcmafler Ffdned lo as docurenls )aE hereb! dc$Erlcd 10 .46P N. m r 16, , tu Endr .lr,44o

D@n{r ^!' dco vor onr D.Pon'6nwnksub be pnduced by lhe rvrhessat the lide md placc ofthedeportron I Onginal copEs of aiy and all documcnls and/or rlngrble ttungs revicwed by lou h anrc'prron 10 dd prepararon for th6 dcposition. Ilno ongnal copros ce bs produced, ptedse produce dupl(.te coples ofthesamc

2 Ong,nd copres olany and alldocumenrs and/or rdgiblc rhings prepJred by you In preparalrontbr Lhs deposrron for t.al in fth marcr. Ilnoongrnalcoprcscanbcproduced,pte6e producc duplcare copEs ofrhe sane

3 Ongnal copics ofa.y and dll documenls and/or tangibLe thrnes thal evdcncc your common law narrage b ARTEiIIO RIOS If no ongnal coprcs can be pioduced. pte6e produce duplrcatc cop'cs ol lhe same.

I Onghal copiesofany and all docuDo.ls md/or Gogiblerhnss prepaEd by or produed by any wrLne$ on tour behalf and which evidences a comnon law mdnagc bctweeo you and ARTEMIO RIoS Ifno ongrnal copres ca bc producod, plcae produce duplcale copres oi rhe

5 Orgrnal Drivcas LicE$e and or Idenhficalbn Cdd issned !o you by lhe Tcxs DcpdnreDr of PubLc Safery, Liccnsing Divisron. 6 Orghrl Socral Secunrycard B$rcd toyoubylhe Soc$lSecunty Admnslarron ? Coples of an_rr dd all Laxrcluhsprepared byyou lioDz012 to the presenr 3 BankSL,lemenrs nrourname for any and allbank accounBheld byyouwrlhanymd

.ll banl or financral NliLudons 9 Cop,es ofd! and all locumcnh and/or ranglble th'ngs rEr evidcncc lour rssdcnce cD<No PR L 1rri d.o/A/a/o rii' D{.ini

'!E

d& rid/or ocr D€pqrbnwld sub TNE LA\v NRM ON FI-OR f,. FLORES, PLLC Rio Gmnde Cily, Texas 78582 Tel. (956)261-l?86 Ia (956)2611750 By /STTLOR E, FLORES

srare BarNo 24065235 Cawsl lor Apphcant SEphanie Rnr

LaPrz[ & Jorois, PLLC 601 Sasler Strel, Ste 650 Tel (713)739-1010 Fd. (?13)?39-101s chris@l&ere ohns cor Bt /S/CFRIS L JOHNS

Cn-Co u e Uor 7 pp I i cd t I Step h @ t e R t a s ci& No f ,!,16, ni tu.'kk o/,4tu',0 nr6 D.@d eu47o cnDeq,doi ddsud

CDRTTI]ICATE OI' SERVICE

I, Flor E. Flores, hcreby cenny thar on th6 tbc llf dayofJuly,20t5. a Fue dd corect copy of he forcgotng Arutuled Notice of Intenno" b take Video An Or Ora! Deposino,, tnh skbpoe"4 Dk.a Tecah, of Mnns Arbidtu FIot6, h6 been upon a| panjes of €cord rn accordtuce uth lhe Texd Rules ofcivil Proceduc

VI,A ELECTRONIC MLING \rIA Ei1{IL: pilbcrforag'lberlorrhontrw,com TUD Larv Orncr oF crl-tr[Rro F^LcoN, PLLC TIA ELECTRONIC FILINC vIA EMAIL: plu alarvornce@aol.con THT T 4$ OI-FI'EOP BlLDIMAN CARZ^ & V^LTVACARA RioC.Mdeclty, 18582

/STTLOR E. FLORIS cdneNo PR 11-16. ta ttu Etuk ol At|l kRia, D44d deq {d/or orn &Po{don ds sub C-\t,58 IO, PR-14.16 I\ TIIE COTJ']'Y COI]RT AT LA\T s !

:\RTti['IO RtOS, SITTINC AS A PROBATII COITRT $ $ STARR COUYI'I,'I'EXAS

DfCf,ASED $ .INIE\DED NOTICD OFINTFj\TIONTO TAKE !IDEO ND/OR OR,|L DEPOSIlIO\.wlTIISIIBPODN,\DTJCESTI]CU]!1.OI-TfLI\RIOS, JR, ITELIX RIOS, JR,, by add through Cilbcrto Falcon. Tle Law Oliice ofGilben. Falcon. ILLC, 120 L'ndbcrg Avcnuc, McAllcr. Icxa 78501 or 404 Bnton Ave, tuo Crande PI,EASE lAKl, NOTICE rhaL. prrsuant (o Rules 199 and 201 | oflhe Texas Rulcs ol

Crvil Procedurc. ApplLcanL STEPH?\NIE RIos will takc tho vdeo md/or onl depoiLon of IELIX RIOS, JR, onAuCUsl,r,:015, al ]:00 p,n, This depos tio. wrllhke PlacealThc Ln$ lirD0fFlort.l'lorcs,PLLC,?00N.Fl0resS1-'Ste.E,tuoCr{ndcCilt,T.xns?3532'lhc dcponoon shallconlrn0e lrorn Jal Lodiy untilcomplclcd ThE depo$ron$'llbc hkct before tr cenrfied courr repond auhonzcd lo admnrler oaths -lhis

dcposrlron *dl be slenosruph,.rlli' recorded byr coun reporcr authonzcd by law Io lakedepo$rons ILE,\SE TAKE FURTHER \OTICE lhal pursuant (o Tcxd Rulcs ofClYrl Procedure 199 l(c).lhe deposllron ofFEI-IX Rlos, JR. maybe lakenby rhe n.n scnosraphrc means ol a \rleorape Fcord ng i. add'tron to senoeraphic means

All panres are rnviLed Lo d(cnd atdcxaminethe $Mes a Frescnbcd bt lhe Te\as Rules ol Civriproccdurc md are rforined rh.t thc Gslimony and/or docLincnLatron oblanrv l be fsed as evrdcncc rn Lhe above{efeftnced dcton

Plcasc takc nolrce lhar $e lndcfsiencd nray cause lbe deposLlion to bevrdcolaped hrsu.nt lo Texas Rule ol Civil PfoceduE 1992(b), Lhe followrs books, pipers,

docunen[. and rangiblc dn]gs (hcrenaner Eleded ro N docurnenls") are hereby de$CnalDd to bc Froduccd bt drc \rllnes ar the rnle and place oltlre depottron

I O.gnal cop,es olrny xnd all docunenls and/or lanetblc 1tu.3s revrcrcd by you ,n lnlrcrprtron ro and treFralron for lhN depo$lon ll no orignal copres can be !rod!.ed, Fleasc produce dupLlcalc coFrcs ofLhc sanre .o!! No PR r hr r, ,r .id, o/i,!r@ nE D!c6,

d@!od//olo{lDcP6n6nwidsub 2 Onsrnal coprcs ofany and all docunsnrs md/or leBible lhings prepded by you i. prcpdar'on for th6 dcposition for rrial in his nauer lfno orisinal copics ce bc produe!. ph6e ptuduce duplcate copres olthesafre

3 Ongin.l copres ofany and all documcnts andor langrblc things lhal you inlcnd lo usc roa 0 you m your rrDr Lest'nrony 4 onBhdcop'es ofany and all documenls and/or Gngible fiings prcduced lo you or oblaDed by you lionr olher persons whrchyou Inrcnd ro usc at tnalto ard you h yourLesrihony on bchaLlolMana Ad.ana Florcs

Rcspecltully Subm (red, THI LAW IIRJ\( OF FI-OR E, FLORES, PLLC Rio Crande Cily, Texas 78582 Tel (956)261-l?86 Fd (956)263 1750 Ema inoreslaw@mall com

/S/FT,OR E, FI,ORES srarc BdNo 24065215 C o m se I lor Apph ca n t Stephont e Rias

LATEZE & JO[\S, PLLC 601 Sa$1erSEeeL,SE.650 Tel (713)739-1010 Id (?ll)719-l0li

/S/CTIRIS I' JOIINS By Ca Cantel lar Awli@t SEph@ie Rios (]au* No ri.!.16; ,r & E!d. o/id4do Ro' D,a,s/ deo bdld cr DePsidon wrh suh CERTIFICATE OF SDRVICE I, Ilor E floEs, hqeby ceniry tbat on rhis rhe l!: day ofJuty, 20 15, a lrue ed conecr copy of the fde9olnl Arended Notce oI hxetuon to Ttke yideo dkt{ot ont D.positioa, Mth Stbpoenn Duc6 Tecth\ ol F.ti! {lor ./:, bas been upon al I pani$ ofrecold D accodd@ with rhe aRulesofcivilProedure.

VIA ELECTRONIC FILING \.IA ET'IAIL: THE LATV OFFIC' oF CII-BERTo FALcoN, PLLC VIA ELECTRONIC FILINC vIA EMAIL: Eazalawoffi c.rA{ol.com TEE LA$ OMCE O! BALDEMAR C^RA & MIi!ERV^ CAKA Rro G6nde Crry, Tex6 78582

ryFlOR E, FLORES .aueNr.pRt+b h th E*xEAtuqn3,6 Dtctfd e vrd@ odltr orr DlPG lon nd s cAtrsf No. PR-r{-16 IN THE ESTATE OI' IN THE COUTY COURT A'T' LA\Y s ARTEIIlIORIOS. SITTINC AS A PROBATE COT]R'I' $ !

DECEASED sIARR COUNTY! TEXAS ATT'NDED \OTICE OF INTENTIO:!'TO TAKE VIDDO AND/OR ORAL DEPOSITION. WITH SUBPOENA DUCESTECUM. OFBEATRIZ RIOS BE^TRIZ RIOS, btr and throush Crlbcno Falcon, The L:v OErce ofGrtbdro Fatcon. PLLC.120 Lindbcrg Avenue, McAllen,lcxas 78501 or 404 Bfluon Alc. Rro Ctrande PLE SE IAKE NOTICE lhat, pursuet to Rlles I99ad20I I ofrhe Tex6 Rutes of

c'!'l Procedure, Applicanl STEPHANIE RIOS will lakc rhc vrdeo and/or oral dcposi'o. of BEATRIZ RIOS onAtrcusl4,20l5, rl2:00 p.n. Th$ depo$tron wnllakc place a!Thc La\ Firm 0rl_lor E, Flo.s, ILLC,700 N. Flors St,t Src, E, Rio cnnd. Cilv, Tcr.s 78582 The depostronshallcootinle lion day Lo day unrl comFleted ThEdcposnronrvrltbe tdke. before a cenrfied coun reponer duthonzed to adrnlnisler odLhs Th6 deposrion rvilt be lenosmphrc^lty recorded br acoulrcpo eraudonzed by la$ to Lake deposrlrons

ILEASE TAKE FURTIIER \.'O-r'ICE thar punuanr to Tex6 Rulcs ofCrvrt Procedure 199 l(c). the dcposilion of BEATRIZ RIOS may be laken by rhe non+tenosraphic mcans ol a udcoLapcrccordngDaddrrronrosrcnogftphrcmems

Allpanrcsarc Invtred (o arLetul ndexamDe lhcwime$ 4 prescribed by Lhc Tcxas Rules olCrvrlpocedure and ffe Informcd lhaL thc LestiDony and/or documenlatioh obrarn rvrll be used as cvrdcnce n lhe aboveiefcrcnccd acrion

Please lakenoricc rhaLLhe underrened may c.usc lhcdcFd$lon to bevrdeoraped P!6uMt 1o Texas Rulc of cilil Procedure 199.2(b). the fotto$,ing books, pape6.

documcnls, md langrble rhnss (herenaner refcifed to N -docurnenLs ) are hercbydcsiemLed ro be produced bt the vrtness at lhc Lncud placc ofthe dcposrhon I Onghrlc.p'es ofany and alldocrmcnLs Md/or rmg'ble rhrngs relrclred b! you m snlrcrpalron lo and pEFnton for this dcposuon ll no orgndl copres cdr be produced, ph$e rroduce duplcalc copics oflhe serc c rNo PFr rr,',rE ,.o/i,r@tur, D.q@t

deo e4d o-r De6n6n wnh sub 2. Oii8inal copi6 of my ed all docm€nls e.Vor regibh things prepeed by you in prepaFtlon for lhB deposition for tnal h lhis nattcr. Ilno original copies can be produced, ples produce duplcare copies of the sne

L Oiginal copies ofany nd aU documents andor Engiblc lhin8s 0Et you rntend to usc lo ad you D your tnal tsthony. 4 Ongind copies of any md oll doclmenLs andor lmgibh rhings produced ro you or oblained by you liom o$d pcBou which you Dtend lo ue at hial !o ad you your tstihony 'n on behalf of Mdia Adriana Flores. RespettuUy Submift€d, THE L^Tv FIRM oF FI-oR E, FLoRTs, PLLC Rio G@de City, Tq6 ?8582 Tel (956)263-l?86 Fa (956)263-1750 Email lfl orslawandl.com By /S/FLOR E. FLORES

srare BarNo 24065235 Consel l4wlicdnt Sleph@ie Rios

TAPEZE & JoHNs, PLLC 601 Sas1tr Steel, Ste 650 Ter {713)719-1010 Fd (713[39-1015 ctuisahwephns om By /gCtlRlS K JOENS

ca-comsl lq Awnmt gephahE Rlos Gu9No PR 1+16! rr Es&ft o/Afu'b Ri" D!@d deo od/ot o4' DlPcidh ne sub

']I.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Flor E Flores, berby cenrry rbar on rhis lhe !g day of.tuty, 20 t 5, a Eue ed corecr copy of ie larcgotne Afthded Nonce oJ htehtion to Take Vid.o ahd/or Otat Deposinon, ,rith Subpo.ta Duca Tecuna of Bearii iior has been upon all parlies of rrcord in acord&ce with rhc TeE Rules orcivit Procedurc

VIA ELECTRONIC FILINC VIA EMAIL:

benotatconhwcon

TlI[ LAw OFFICE oF GILBIRTo F^[coN. PLLC 320LindbereAve

VIA

ELECTRONIC FILTNG I14j44lt: eazsr,rorfi e@ld.com TFE LNW OFTICE OF BALDIMAR G^RZA & MINERVA CAN Rro Grdde City, T€x6?8582

64!8R E. fLORES .i8 Nr PF.trlr. k tr. E.bv ol ad\m Fps. omtt c vid6 dclor od ftpoddon li|n s cAusL No. !R-t1-16 IN TIIE COUTY COLRI'A'I'LA\f IN TiIE ESTATE OT \

s

SI TINC AS A IROBATE COTIRT

ARTDI\'IIORIOS,

0 s l

DECE4SED STARR COUNTY, TEXAS A\IENDED NO1ICE OI IN'TENTION TO TAKE VIDEO Ai\'D/OR ORAL DEPOSITION. WITH SUAPOENA DL'CEqIEEUUJIIIN{qE!]4-BI.q! ANA BELIARIOS.byandthrooehGrlbenoFalcon,TheLavOfliceofGrlberloFalcon, PLLC, 120 Li.dbcre venuc, Mc^llcn, Texas 78501 or 404 Br(ton Ave. Rio Grande PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that. pursurnl to Rules 199 rnd 201 | of rhe Tex6 Rules ol

C'v'lProcedure. Appl'canl S TEPHAN IE RIOS rvill lakc I he rideo and/o. oral dcpos'tron ofA\A BELIA RIOSonAugusll,20l5, rl l.00 th. Thr deFst,on wrll nkc pla.s ar Th. L{wFirn ol Flor E, Flor6, PLLC, 700 N, Flors Sl,, Stc. E, Rio Grande City, Tcxns t8582 The depo$honshalLconnnucfomdatlodayunxlconrpleted ThNdeposno.*rllbetakenbeiorea cedrJieJ courl reponer lu(honzed 1o !dolnBler orlhs ThLs depo$ron w'll be nenogrrph'cJ\ re.oded br d coun repone' durhon2ed bt law @ Lake depos'lrons

PLIIASE TAKE l_URTHER NOl ICri that puNant to Tcxas Rulcs oaCNrl Proccdurc 199 l(c). de depoylron of,\\,4. BDLII RIOS may be hken by lhe non sleno-qdphrc means ofd vldeohpe recodxrg n addrLron lo senosraphrc means

All patues are nvrled lo a(end and exannne the wnness 6 prescrbed b_v lheTexasRules .lCrultro.cdurc a.d a.c Lnfoan.d thal Lhc tcsDory and/or documentaoon obtarn Nrll be uscd 6evdene m lhe lbove referenced rcrion

Pleaselakcnolrcethatlheunderrgnedmry causelhedepostronlobevrdeotaped PuEUanl ro Tex6 nule of Cr! Procedure 1992(b), rhe follorvine books. papc^,

documenls, rnd r.ng,ble rhrnes (bere,mter refened ro as do.Dnenr") are hdebl desgnared ro bcproducedb!rhe\vrhcssatrhclmcandplaccoathcd.pos(ron

I Onernal coprcs ofany and all docuinenls dnd/or ld.grble th'ngs tv'ewed by you 'n anli.rtalroi to and trcparalron lor rhis dcposiLion Iano origmal coprcs car bc produccd, plcasc p.oduced!tl'care cop'ds ol lhe sMre cN!No !R!16.rdr.\,,.!//,,2(Jro\.rr<4d

d@ rqTorofrDeP4nror Fih sq! 2. orisinat coprcs ofay ud all documenLs md/o! tangible thn$ prepded by you jn prepdatron lor lhis deposition forrrial in tLlis naner lfnoori8iml @pr6 co be produced, pte6e produc€ duplicatc copies of the me

3. Onginal copics ofdy md alt dochenrs e(yor tangible lhinga that you intod !o use to a'd you your liEl tesrimony 'n 4. Original mpies ofey ed all d@uhents md/of tanglbte things produced b you oi oblan€d by you Eoh olner petsons $6ich you Dlend !o use at rriat to ad you in your teslimony on behdf of MdDAdriana Ftores.

Respecttu y Subhrned, TFE L^TV TiRM OF FLOR E. ITORES, PLLC Rio Grddc City, Texa 78582 Tel (956)261-l?86 Fd (955)263-1750 Emaill By /S/FLOR E, FLORES

srale BeNo.24065235 Cauhel Jor )pplico Steph@te Rios

LAPEZE & JoHNs, PLLC 601 Sa*1!r SlJeet, Ste.650 Tel. (713)739-1010 Fd: (713)739,1015 By /s/CH S ra JOIINS

Co-Canyl lor Appli@nt Stephmie Fios a\* .PR-1+16 ra tk Esbb E Adnto Rks, D.eEd deo Dd/d or DlPstdm wih sub CIRTIFICATE OFSERYICf,

I,FlorE Flor6, h€@by cerlit that on ln6 thc !!: day ofJuly,20 15, a true ed coiiecr copy of Ihe farcCo ne Ahe ed Notice oI htention to Take Vilteo nh o, Ont D.positior, Mth snbpo.hn Duc6 Teca,tt of Aaa ,a/ia Xiar, ha been upon atl panies or @ord in ecorddce wrththe Texd Rulcs of Civil Prcedu.€

VIA ELECTRONIC FILINC VIA EMAIL: TfiE L{w OFFTCE oF G|L8ERro FaLcoN, pLLC rIIIA ELECTRONIC FILING vl4-El!4ll: TqE LAw Or[rcE oF B^LDEnr R GARZA & MTMRVA CARZ\ Rro Grande Cuy, Texas ,8582

/SIFLOR E. FfORES Gu* No PR.l+b r' r! E i!2 o/ 4'.d4 RrG, Ddl d d@ od/4 orat D.Pcidon wrh slr

FLclFIES!

700 N Flores Slreet Ste E Rrc Gra.de cily. Texas 70582

|b rc.cthd+erenaybesore.olrr{o, ,r Jdror.o lre deposrt o.s or ^ "ugo Atdr'/ Jr An.r Anerro R.\ , We I a /e , o, yet ,akcr tre on rrral da1e. howeverwe are now requesting lo st2n ar 9:oo a m on lhal date noL sva abe p ease provde dares forthedepos rons ror lhe fo0owng week. ptease prcvde theses dales no later thzn tomonow al noon so that we en schedute these

t)L''L' ? llil/ ''*1& FL ESI FAX COVER SFIEET Robje Flores/S.rah W Ftores ) 1.43 115a)

l-

(r 33tD O uR.rNr eroRR.vtrw gptrA$coMr,rNr Opr^sRrpry lL! r.bh \!trh^. 7m7r amd eAusE No. Dc-13-971 IN TIIE DTSTRICTCOIIRI IITCOALANIZ, JR., STEPI]ANIE RIOS $ !

And ARTE^{rO RIOS, JR , hdividunuv rnd On Behrlforthe Enale oTARTEMIO RIOS,

$ Plniltills, $ s s s

JOANN GONZALEZ and $ R{TTES GONZALEZ, $ s ! ! ]8l''JUDICL4L DISTRICT

\'\RIA YAGDALI'NA FLORES, AS $ NEX FRIEND OI AT'IY DELCARMEN s RIOS, I'IJ\OR CHN,D s s !

$

ll,ORES, IndividurllY $ $ $ !

$

COLIJIlBIA COMPANY, INC., $

^NDERSO:\

$ STARR COUN'I Y, TEL\S s Df,IENDANT'S I{OTIO\ TO OUASTI DEPOSITION OF STEPHAT{IE RIOS NOTICED B\ ISTFRVE\UI{ PL.\I\ I T \hRI,A ADRI{AA FI OR PROTECTIVE ORDER

,IO

THE HONOR{BL'JUDGE O[ S{ID COURTJ CONIDS NO\\ , Andelson Coluhbia Conpdnv, lnc Delendant here n md files |ns Molron 10 Quash IntrvcnoFllr'nlilTMana diana Florcs ( f_lo'es ) Nollce ol lnLenion Io Take the oral Depositrons of Stefhmre Rios, and Motron Ior Irrotcctlve Order and $ould show the Coun as D.rrmrssrrorlo\roa(a!{Drrcsrro\sorSrLrHANrEtuosNdrcEDBtlNrERv'roF-PL{\ftrt}L{nIA

rt-;. -- p ii""i. r..^.i ^" L MOTION TO OUASII . I On May 29,2015, Deienddt Anddrcn Colmbia Company,Inc noticed tle dePoshons of Arrenrc tuos, Jr., Hugo Alaniz, J!. md SlePhdie Rios ed Ptodu@d fies notrcs lo InleNenoFPlahuff llores' @unFl via facsinil€ whDh M confimed a reeived t'e Err,bt-4 No ootion to qudh s filed with thN Coun bv Floret couns.l.

2. The deposilioN of lhe PlainLifrs w€re held on Jue 9, 2015 in tuo Ctdde Citv Tes AlL\ough inviLed to arcnd ed prcPerly noticed with lhe notice, Ilores @unsel did nol atlend d.posilioN See aJ,6,t ,.

'ha.

l. On August 6.2015, via facsmile, nndeBlsned cohsel reerved lne Notices oflntenlion !o Take lhe Oral DeposiLions of Ademio Rios, Jr', HDSo Ald% Jr' dd Stephoie Rios scbeduled urlaledlly by Flores on AueDsl 6, 20l 5 Sed Exlirit c'

4. Counsel for Defenddt M never consulLed regddns dv 6Ped ofhe dePosilions ofihe Tbe Court should qudh the deposition nolice of SrcphmF Rros bccause the tde ed Place 5 for StephmE Rios deposrlDn is uuesonable The Court should turlher q@h desEm€d rhis deposnron becase Counsel for Defendmr did no! agee with counel for Plainuf_ lnt€peDor regfiding the time ed plae. Fimllv, the courl should quah the deposidon not& becase lnc dcpor ion ha already becn laken Defenddt fdrther noles to quash tbe notice ofdeposition of S@phsi. Rros for r€don

6 thal comel foi Defendanr s uable lo atlend fte dePoslron as not'ced. dd h'r€bv oblecls to rhe tine, date, ad place of lhe oral dePosil[n

ADRI^NA FAORS ND MOTION FOR PRO'OW ORDEN TlrE norion 6 illcd wrthrn three business da-vs ol Plantilfintervenoas \o1rce, accord'nglv ths MoLion oblectlngLo Lhc datc, Lme and plaF lor the deposiLion hcrebl au'onalrcallv sLavs rhe depos lronunLrltheMo oncanbc rulcduponbl lhe coun S?g Tex R Crv P 194 4 Funhc.. rcounhas dscrcion roDrokcLlpaityrvithaProre.lrlcorder TexRcrr P 192.6 ,4€han I M.!lhahy199S\1t 2d s580.551(TeY 1990) A coul lEs thc aulhonrt b I'mn rhe scope or distrbuhon ofdiscovery based onLhe.ccds and c,tumsances offie cde sde 'lhc DcfendanL dks lhe Cou fo. a protscove ordd bscause Flotes dcPostron requesrs at unreasonabb cumulanvc and dupLlcatile TexRCi!P \92 4ln)', sle be\ter & Prtcha"t PCr.Jor,rD,,l6?Sw3d460,166(TexAtfltouslonll4$DisIl2005,petdeniedl Ile

They $tre depos'Lr.ns properlv nouced by rhe Ddttndan n lh$ crsc and sened on au p.nies. Including counsel for Florcs l;lores cou el did nornle adolioo lo qu6h he deposhons and chos not to altend thedeposiLions Indeed. Florcs' counsel cotrld have arLcnJcd the deposnions \rhen dll orhcr counsel Nerc prcseDl and asked anyque$lons thcy had al thallrnc Thev simflv chosenoLtodo so ln addilon. Defenda.l dks lhe Couir for a poLecrivc order because Florei deposition rc,tucss are harassineand amotine llorcs Dd hcr couNelma-v snpb read Lhe ftascnpr olrhePlann ls deposnLon lo oblarn ady infomatron rhcl mav necd -1cx RCrvP 192 6(b) Rather lhan,lo so. howcvcr, lhey are exl)eclnglhc pmrcs to spend anotherdtv In dcpostrons n dupLcalrve a.d cunuhtrle deposllrons al lhc cxpense ol lhe olher pMlcs

DrllND1\r\\torror roa!3soD rroD sYI\rLNtNoR_PL\^frfll\tLRra ROTAOF'ORb'R I I A coun has broad discrctron to proLect a peson with a proteclrve order See TcxRCrvP coun can (l) Pohib,t rhc drcovery soushr Lnwholeo npan, (2) I'nrr rhe exknl 192.6(b) ^ orsubcct mauer ofdiscolery. (l) order thar discovery.ot bc underhken at the hne or place speofied. (4) e( rems or cond,nons on the discovcry, (5) order de resulls orthe dMorerv lobesealedoroLhcMiscprolccled,and(6)nrakeanyolhero er in fie imcrcn ofjlshce ft

12 Fo. rhc resons descnbed aborc, Dclind.nl 6ks the Coufl ro sgn a protecnve ordef Lbar prohrbrts the dddr'odal deposition of SlephD'e Rros wHER'FORE, PREMISES CONSIDDRDD, Dclenddl, Andenon Colunb'a conpanv.

Inc, 6ks tbN Coud ro qudh InlcNcnoFP arn,fa Mfi'. Adriana llores' DeFosnon Nolicc of Srephan,eRros and aho 6ks the Coun bsct this molron forprorecrvc order Ior heafns md, altcr hcdine,lo ksuc ar order proh'btring Inle(enoFPlalnlrrTfrom noticins lhesc depo$tons a' anv rme ,n lhe tururc, od lor such olher and turthcr re|eflo which DcfendanL nray be enlitlcd, crther al LarY

TIIIi WILLIS LT\W GROIIP, PLLC

$ILLIAMCLAY

S@rc tsarNo 04132425 JAS S. BR,{ICH slale DarNo 24031193 IiIRK D' WILLIS Slalc Bar No 21648500 10440N Cenlral Dxpre$wav. surte 520 Dallas, Texa ?5211 TelePhone (2 l'1) 716_9'lll !rcsimlk (214) 716'9994 Scrvice Email: scn ice@thNillislerg.ouP..om A'ITORNEIS TON Df FENDAN'I' ANDERSOT_ COLII\'lBIr\ COMPANY, lnC

DrF.NDr\r\\loror roar \su DE CERTTflCATE Of SERVICE on coNel l6led below h a mener @ns'stenl ut nn Fa6ahil.. (956) 261'17t0 TTIEL IIRM O! ILOR E ILORES 700 N. 1106 Street, Sdne E Rio cmde c'ry. Tx 7E5E2 V'd Fotinile: (713) 739-I0Is THE I,A}EZE IIRM, P C. l l3 Vine S rrct, SuiLe I00 Hoslon, TX 77002 A t n ey Io I P I o I h rn/ P tai" nfJ n t. n e n o rs G o n. a I e z na Faimite : (9t6) 487-6J3 6 Th€ t2wOff:ceofc beno Falcon, PLLC McAllen, TX 78501 ltbmert /o/ lntenercr MMo Adnma Flores

JAS S, lRAlCIl D$ENN\MMIONTOA A DETCNDNS OF SEENE RI6' NOTI@ D! IIEAENOR'PdfM MAL Pac.5 tulN FDnB^NDMdioNrcRP

cAUSENO, DC-1J-971 SUCO A!!\UL J& ST TPEAN'IE RIOS 5

IN TEE DISTRICT COURT

Atrd ARIEMIO RIOS, JR,,lDrthtdur(vao{t S Ob Behrlfoftb€ Ensre ofAXTEltllO RjOS, S

Prcihlt|t ,

s

$ s !

JO$-N GONZAIEZT $d RNMESGONZALEZT S S s s

331" flrDtCL{L DTSTRICT III.ARL{ MAGDAI,ENA FI'RES, AS i NEXT FRIEND OF AMY DEL CARMEN $ Rtos, A tdl\oR CEILD

$

$ s \

MARIA ADRIANA ILORFJ, hdiddually S InbutPl4irnills .. S s 5

ANDERSON COLUMBLA COM!A]\Y,INc., E D.Jend,nl

a stnrn courrv, rrx,rs ORDER GR,{NTINC DEFEADANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE MAIILA ADRIANA FLORES INDI\4DUAI- CAPACITY'S PLEA IN INTERi'ENTION OD Augle 5, 201 5, cade on ro be he.rd Dctddars Moho! to Srite Msja Adrim noB lndividud Cap&iry's Pl6 in lniadmtior Tbe CoM ha co.sidftd the Morbq ltmrd ud rhc respo$e ud eeldeE ol coucl dd tEds tblr lle MotjoD sholld be GRANTED.

lT IS THEREFOX! ORDIRED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED rh4 Defhddrs Mo6oo to Stil€ M&ir A&i@ lloG Individuol Capaciryh pt.a n br ntio. is i! oI dinss GRANIED Md that her ?lea il InrerdtioD is be!€by ,lisbised.

SICNED ftis I I th d.y ofAlsus 2015. ODR GM,WG DISEMAM'S MO'ION M SME \,'fu ADfuANA FbiES IDMIT o^r-(* ofser Frord (9$)263-t750 #593 P.OO2/AO2 oa/17 /2t_15 22io5 F.o-t Soroh Wllliqghom Flores Roel "Robi,e" .A.ftcrney*Mediafor A.itorney-f.4 sorohfloreslow@ott net

F.L.,_CIEEH

August 18, 15 Flor E. Flore 700 N Street Ste E , Texas 78582 Rio Grande Fax:956. .1750 RE: DC-1 ^[1] Dear Mrs : , please find the following dates to proceed with the depositions of Artemio Rios, Jr., and Hugo Alaniz, Jr., the dates are as follows:

Stephanie 25th afternoon, August 28th afternoon, September 1"t morning/afternoon 2nd morning. be advised in the event you failto respond to this request I will prepared per my convenience. the notices you have any questions please feel free to contact the office. W'" Roel "Robie Flores Attorney at

RF/II

cc: Gilberto alcon

\-- Rene Fax(956 487-6336 335i N. Wure Fld. O: 956-63:-7188 F: 956-631-726& McAlien, TX ^[78501]

A8/L8/2015 10:08AM IJob Number 7645] Aoooril r+593 P.OO1/OO2 Oa/17/,F15 22tO5 Fram: Roel "Robierl Soroh \r/ilfinghqm Flores Attorney-Medi Atiarnev-Medic*ior ,ssro hf loreslow@ctLnef FLCIFIEEi A'I?AslhJ€Y& ]aT LA\JrJ

FAX,COVER sl{t=ET , : l:. FROM: i ,.. ::: ll.::: I ,,li ffovzs. :r . ,',RoeJ lRobie'1:Ffores/SarahW.'Flores a 3- ifsD

FAX NUMBER:

TOTAL NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET:

-[3- '<1 t\ {J }Zir-,r a CAUSE NO: Ittth,n$,

I

lN 'lHE MATfER oFi :( 33 In the Interest of l E un,cerur E purnsg coMMENr D plels;r trptv EI ron REVTEw E plEnse REcycLE NOTqS/COMMEN oEltM wtrH THfs TRANS,MTS!tOil,'pLEASE (oNTA<I OUR OFfrcE. IF.THERE rs,A message is a privileged and confdenliql attorney-client gommunication and it is rransmitted forthegxclugive

This information and use the addressee. Penon5 responsilJe f9r delivering this cownunication to the intended legipiqnt are admonished that this communication 1o!becopied.ordisseminaledenceptqsdirectedbytheaddressee. lfyoureceivethig,communicetigliqenoq please nolip us !y tefephone and mail the (ommunication t9 qs at the address abole

Mail tr YES ' :.,e1 NO Original to follow Q:936.b31-7lBB 353tr. F{, Wore ,Rd. F: ,956:63'r-2268 McA.llen. {X 7B5Sl 08/78/2015 1O:07AM IJob Number 764d1 @OOOf ctAUsE i{o, PR-14-016 IN TIIE COUNTY COURT AT LAII IN THE ESTATE OF s s

ARTIIfIO RIOS, SnTINGr\S A PROBATE COLRT $ s

DECf,ASED STARR COUNTY, TDXAS s APPLTCANT'S IIOTION TO Ql,'.ASlI DEPOSITION OF STEPII \IE RIOS, ARTEMIORIOS, JR AND TIUGOALANIZ & MOTION FORPROTECTIVE ORDDR TO TEE HONOR{BLE JUDGE OFSAID COURTJ

COIIES NOIV, Apphcml STEPHANIE RIOS,loLncd by AR'l ENllO RIOS, JR. and IIUGO ALANIZ, and nle lhis Morion ro Qudh Inlervenor ILARIA ADRl.l\1 FLORES' Nonce oflntenflon to Takc thc O.al Dcpositrons ofSrcphd's Rros. Ancnno R'or, Jr md Hugo Aldn,z and Motlon for ProreclNe Order, and $ould show unto rhk Coun as lollols

L Motion to Ott4h Applcant STEPSANIE RIOS contends thallnteflenor NIARIA ADRIANA FLORES N notcnLitlcd to hkc Lhe dsposilions ofAppllcam STEPHANIE RIOS, An'rENrlO RIOS, Jn. or HUGO AL NIZ. Inleryenor [t-^RL\ ADRIANA I.-LORES nled a Peulion In Intenenlion iorDerenninationofRiehrollnherileceonAugusll.20l4. See 4ta.hed Erhibir "A "

h h6 been ovc a year $nce the Inrercnor Ilhd hq Pqrlron In Inlcrvcnoon dd dunne lhar penodof hq several heanngs $€re scbeduled m rh[ case, all resetat InLeNenoas reque$ upon $rrncn or oral Modo.s for Conli.uanccs During rhc Lnnc of filn-e of lhc lnrcdcnrion on Augusl l. 2014 tud today s darc, ,\ugue 23, 2015, Imurvcnor hds cnsascd n absolurcly zcro dscovery and h6 or y caused lhN proceedurss robe delayed, resulln-srn prejudrce roAppllcanl

OnAugusl20,2015, Lbe paroes entered nro dd thN Coun $g!ed a DockeL ConlJol Order selurg rhh mattcr on ns dockcr for a Sp.o.l Jun Trirl sl forSep(en'ber3.20ls nl9:00 r.p Sad Dockct Conrcl Ordcr scB all dcadlincs, lrcludrng thc dcadlmcs to complctc dNcovcry, as per lhe Tex6 Rules ofCrrlProcedwe See didched Exhibit "8."

Texas Rule ofclvil Procedure 1992(a) spe.incalLy slales that nr o,nl.lepositiot nn6t be hken tunnB th. tLsco,ery p zdrt 'Ihc dfcorcrypcrod, gcncrilly, bc-q$ thc darc acausc $ nled Md ends lh'ay (10) days before lial Tex R c,v P 190:l(bl(l)G) and (b) A l'l'em,s farlue 10 d rsendy use dre rules ofcNrl procedure for d6covery purposes Nrll norrusrrry rhe eranrlngofaconhnudce.S/arsrlyaa.lAilDistnbntihg,lrc.15lSW:d86:1,865(Texl9E8)

lunnehorc, rntcrvenor ha lirted to co.ter $1n counsel .egardhg rbe ^ppxcant.s scheduhngofdepostio6intbismaller A(omoyRoct,,Robie,,Floresscn!Apptrcanascounsela lerlcrrequcslrnBdeposnrondaresforlhedeposirions ofsrephtureRios, Aneh,o R,os, Jr Dd Hugo Artu'zon Augusr 18,2015 Ar lhe tineofsd corespondence, auorncy Roet ,,Robie,,

Flores had nor enreEr an appedece D oB mdler and befoE this coun In fact a omel Roet ..Robte,, FloEs entercd !n otficEl appeanncc in th6 nrancr at I lu pm on loday s daE Addrlronaly. anorher Roel Robre Florcs senl eid norice rnan ancdpt ro schedute d€pollonsoflheabovc- nrmedpaniesncaDseNoDcB-9?l,r$ongfutdcxrhcaefilcd,nthclSliJudlcratDsrflcr CounofSratrCounfr, r'ex6 SeedltachedE\hibit,,C.,,tnre}cnorhasaheadybeenshckenas .pn!hrhatc6eaneraheanhgonaMorronrost.ikehermrervenlrod

Moroler, tnrcryenor norrccdlbe deposrljo. ofHLgoAtanrz, rvho r nora parl,rn lhis dse, by seryns nouce ro Applicant s ca\nsct Sce aha.hed Exhibi,D,, Inrcflenor h6 faited ro conply wrlhthe Texd Rulcs ofCrvit procedure r norrcing tnc deposlron or Hugo Alanjz, a non panynlhrcsc Tex R Crv p t914(b)(l) Appticanl tun.er conten,ls rhaL rtugo Atar 6 nor o heir oftheenate ofAnenno Rios, deceased, and B nor ctarmhg ro have D rdre.est tn rbc esa|e sublecl 10 lhis surl Horvcver. wirh resards to Fugo Aranrzs deposlron, App|canr tunher .onlends thal lnlenenor has had over a year ro conducr dNcovcry and oeposc \vtrnesses ad tilted o exercAe due drlgence ndoingso Thc deadlhes for drcovery havc passed and no asreenrenb \rrc reached rceardng lhe deposttrons ofApplca Sletanre Rios. Aft€nro tuos, Jr or Huso Aldnu Texas Rules ofCrvrl procedurc requtrcs an asrcchcnr ro excnd dbcovery deadlqcs 10 be inwrhng, olheNjse rt 6 no erforceablc fex R Clv p ll Thcre $"s no laxc

'ieposnons such agreement reached ln th^ case Thr moronr fitcd snlji. rhree (l) burne$ ddrs ofrnrryenols Notice,,ccordinetrr dis moron objecrrng ro rnc dare, rime, and ptace for rhe depos(jonhetab\ nntohnticnt, ,fiJs I /?p"ritd, until theDo(ionca. be nrled upon by lhe Coun Tex R Crv p 194.4

U. Monoh nn ptutedi,e O rd Fudher, aCoun hN dacrcrron to prorecl apany uLh a prolecrve oder Tex R Crv p 192 6:Lreb.n t Mc han',,198 S W2d 5580,5j3 (Tex 1990) A Coun has the authornyto |Dtr Lhc scope or dEtrrburonofdncovery based or rhe needs md orcunst nces ofrhe cde Ter R Apptrcmt sks rhe Coun for a protecrrve oder becduse tnrervenor,s deposnron Equesrs dc unEasonable, noqced after the deadtine for djscorcry pascd, and no agFemcnt w6 hade prorlolnenol'.€loallowfordrscovcryanertlEd$coverydcadtjnes Interyenor fdrled roexercNe duedrligenceinconductrngandengagingindrcoyeryMrhnrhedi$overydeadln$ Morethan one (lJ ycd hd p6ed since InLervenor fited an Inrcrvenlion D rhis nancr ed farted to conducr any dEcovery wlaboeler Now lhrce (l) bL6iness days before the l.rat. Intcneior nolices deposuonsol Applicot, Arlemio Rros, tr and HugoAlanrz, d mun-pdLy In rn6case

A Coun ho broad dBcrelron ro protecr ape$onsrrh a prcrechve order Tcx R Crv p lt26{b) ACou cm(l)prchrbirrhedNcovc.ysoushrrnwhoteorrnpa(i(2)lnirlheexrnror ebFq dafts of dNco!€ryt (3) ordcr rhar d$covery oot bc unden3ken ar fie hmc or ptace spcoind, (4) st lenns or condrrions on rhc discovcrr, (5) order rhe resulrs oftjBcovery @ be sealedorotheNrcprorecled.and(6)malcanyorhqo s rn thc jnteresr oflustice Id

Forlhe rooo.s dcscribed abolc, Apptrc..l aks de Coun ro srsn a p.oledivs order rhar prohrbrslhe deposilions of Aptli.Mr Slephanre Rros, AireD ro Rros, Jr and Hugo Atmz 1II. P:!!!!! WHEREFORq PRENIISES CONSIDERED, A|plcanr STEpH,\NIE RIOS, ARTEMIO RIOS, JR, od Htlco ALANIZ ask rhis Coun ro quash the InreNeno. irLtRIr\ ADRL{NA FLORIS' deporrion nohces,ud also ask rhc Colntoscr rhs mooon forprorcclivc order tbr a heanne &d. ancr dic hednng,lo issue an ordr prchrbjhng rn(eryeno. from noLrci.g rhese dcposnon at any tDre rn rhe fulure, a.d lbrsuchorherand tunhcr relEf ro Nhich Defend&r hay beentrtled b, erther a! la\r or r cq!ity

Tsr LA\r FrRlr OF Fr-oll E. FLonEs, prlc 700N llores Sl Rio GEnde Ciry, Texas ,8i82 Tel (956)263 l186 Fax (956)261-l?50 E nJ I lnoknr$ r sJrl.ud BY /S/ILOR E. FLORES

C on'e | [ar tpp h ra' t S kphdh E R?s 60 | Sasrrtr Srreel sG. 650 Te| (7ll)739-1010 Fu (7ll)739 l0l5 BY 61E}|RIS K.JOHNS

slareBtrNo 240023J3 cdcorhet Jor Apph.a,t Stephame Riat

CERTIFICATE OF SER\,,ICE I,llorE.FloEs,hcebycerrfylharon6kthe dayotAugus! 20t5, a rue ad conecl copy of 6e latcEoinE Motion to punsh Noti.a of h,tent to Ttke t/idto ond/or Ont D.potno, of Jr.?ra,ic Rios, has been upo. rtt panies ofrccord n accord.nce wnh $e Texd Rulcs otCivil

VIA ELECTRONIC FII,NG

VIAENIAIL:

THE LAw OrrcE orcrBrRro FALcotr.., pLLc VL{ ELECTRONIC IILING vIA EMAIL: er?ih$orfi!. arot.oh, TH! LAw OIIICE OF BALDEyAi cARa & Mh.ERvA cARzr Rro Grmde Crty, Tcx,s ?8582 \IIA ELECTRONTC FILINC vIA EIIAIL: robi.nur6,r, ncr FLoRrs A1'roRNrys At L^$

/S/FLOR E. FLORES IIOR E fIORES

-i i 5"2,,.,

{

rx trtE aOLJHTY C 5 s

ARTE&IO R]OS, $ s

DECEASED

s PETITION ]N INTERVENTION FOR DEIER[iIl!2iICN CF RJGIIT OF INHERITANCE TO THE HONOi-A3LE JTJOGE OF rilS COrj,1.

I'ARIA IIAGOALENA FLORES .i AMy R,Os, A MTNOR nletuecor ne.e.. iies fiis rn:eryenr.n .1. ::i.i.. L. :erernaron oi igh! or rhner€n€ p!rsua/:t ro sed.o. 201 0;2

Code a.. resp.-+- y STEPHAi E Rtos has acdan^pp ..r,on r\ rer.mr.e -e rce o: ins pea Dy;e.cr,g s :.ay to 1.. an...ey Fo. E Fbree ar Tca N Fjcrer sr sre. E Rro Gi6^da:Fr ;:rs 7t5e2 rlRTEBro Rlos, Jr fds nbo. aarve. oi s:a e o: oe appLrcahoi :i;r./ sTEFxAftrE R|OS pe may a€

i6:0 GLadarqpe C/.e ilo Grer.e Crt/ Eras 785a2. Amy R,rs has aj!s|ca.re rnle€sr n ihjs proc€ ne zs ?.rrid 3rc herotARTEftO RlOS ? Verle .c pi.!e, ,n rnE @ rn bee6e Oi.rre.i wa: . resd€nr 6i S6d colnry 3 tre de€re.rs tde is aRIEMto i:os

:-Grer'a€d

rn \6,.nkr 30 2013 aL Far64 4elgiG S!:- :ou.ry rera: a rr:. Fe rioa.dge o, app 5 M,lR A MAGOALE4, rlori:s -:

'.-Fr':a.l fn^v FIL E lXltlOR, rEijdas i707 W ZO,r Mrsslon, hiaaLg. C.unry. i3xss 7s572. AIy ruOa b 6. At th€ ire ot hrs death, dec€den: tunec €5! 4. oe6on.i pore4y to.ared :n S&tr CouV.lexes as wltas a .taim i. calre fro oc-.3_e7r 3s1r Jldicial ould.t Cou4, Sr.r CodDly, Texas. ot e5q h6r o fie d€

€dent, .nd :he t.ue i.rtd.dr cr :i6 Eppx€r o ach hek h the ec4oen! s esiare ar€ * fotlo : 1;3

I

ladElltpe qtr.re. Rb cate Cn! 7a5A' F.i.ionsnrpr Sh66 or E( ! SnE.eorrBo

1t3 t7c1v! 51. Missd, T*s

-4,<72

R6i€rEnship. ;ir lo Sha of r€at Frore,rly .,n Sha .f peen.t proper.y:

8. Th€ &€enr de maded o Xoonin pe.er aDd ln6t dE4ia96 rr! r6n 4qsd by nanl<c h,as t€minaFd on .]!t 5. 2oi L by dec.€ .t drcr Bnefed ,n C.us No. € FaOe 2 ofs CC-11{8. CouDry CoJi a! L.y/ oiSra, Co!n:y. Tues netuenor h* b€ jnft,rmed €n rhar l}l.E mEy be lnoLher claim .f aotr@n taw n.,nage. .ul 3h€ nor ha* €ny farlher tntofi.lrcr rn Jtar r€gard. Eacnkadnnzlsgeoitied ent has D€en ti.lql 9. AJr.niidr€. boj !o or adopied ay rhe ,€.edenl hEve ceen tisred in rh€ 10-.tntevenor has omtne.i rh6 iollowmg infor.naoon :eqwed by sdrois 202.@4

202.005 olth€ T€c Esble. code. fr6 t^js appti.aror none tl an apFtt€rro. fd rnderende.t adfinisvaLon E p.ndrog b€foF this coun .a6e runber, inbreacr v.5 . p5,ry in Irp aomhrErEuon prqsdings F.ayer fc, Re!.i loi.ryenr on, €.d Irar uFon ,tet &,9, rhe coLr. r. D*rfrrne .oo establish who i5 €n:i 6i ro !.e cisvtburlic. of the 6l! ot o €nt ARTEhto RIOSi 2. temin€ and esbbjish,h. rishlo, jrner:lan€ crAfy tuOS i.3 share ofrh€

d6cecsa. e6taE uncer les6 €w. Md 3- Cral hlereno. any o! r reuer to wnd, r.r6rve4cr is enrtreo. ResF4,tull sbr,Rei. prge : oiS rJob NqDer.66rr booo{ MEYeR & GUERFERO. L.L.p_ Dgrid J. G!€neb lvo\den, TeEs 7E5O1 fHE FIAMIRIZ TAW FIRM. PLIC C un 4 ior hr9@nor Star. Be. No.: 1€506700 Eir,4 Co-couise tD. rntery€nor S't€te Ba. No.: 24067619

CERNFrcAIEOF SERVICE I c€r0t g$ on A.rgutt 2014 a n1g ..3 _..* Arbmcy lor srsph&i€ R,os Sre E 1X 73s32 7@

FAxi €55)?e3-1 750 3y ltil

rroD xuD.! 6r$1 6ortu 0,ct0cL?_, AU0 2 0 ?015 P{(-\4.iro

COLJRT

PLa L,"tFF (s) vs. DEFENDANT.{s)

STARR COLNry, IE X,{S nockfl cufrTFol r)Rtln AE REMEMBERID drAt Otr ruA,Tnat(qoeli.dr ycs

B,

Deedlinero r€4tr*r lorjuD: rnir cr5e L sa fo. Tntt

q_-oo:_a,

{ PE Trid co"iqcnce tr ser fo! tP'! rrhr No!!.d LtudoD)

L

'lGpornN sunNaD morions h.rns on via.o;on,yon rrriiiiiliiG. errdispor' re strmnrry mohnsrd p(,nal h"oiDg""- d nd o* !p",d. fi;; ft c deltl,jr! 6r d.signdion or*pen wiLneses ro' DelEndr(rlrj is, Tal? lhe dernLidc lor lesigndion ofe$ft !ibqj(\ ror nr:in,,ff(.) tr. TT,CP Thede line tor lompleri.n T-4( P

ordftcotcD for Defcrdbr G) n 7V( p fil.dqdtjm r..compkrjo j of,l \co\rD iof P,, i( fi(sl i' Ihe deadlidd ao' amendnen, drrl ph&rre5 rof dr D.&,du,I,tt !!cI

77rt

L. The dqdlinc tor amendhenl otallplerJhE. for $c pld Dr fi O) ir: Tn. d.:,llirr ro subnrLbm.d n,on . Nrrod.(ory: Itrij1 Lj0 IRISIDNG JIJDGE {PPRO!€DAS TO !ORM] H't F (S) ATrO&{EV

MME:

p1"LC FlP,.lvl. JL A'DRESS: .T 4-

?@a?)

S) ATIORNEY 4nen 6,zp

,7EAA

/c./: (tsl) .?-7t3t Frx: &S&) Asz- a8o1

F.L."FF^ES Slreet Sre E ity. Texas 78582 1154

REi OC-13,971 ff.?ffi J,:,1iyl,ff Hl:,:TiT: :llil::T$i:fr :'

"."h":['ffiT

lusld i5- gfi enoo ususr 2€i arrernoon sepremDe" 1- morFins/aiemoon sePlember 2tu mom

,.- . .Please .dvised In the eventyiu tar to,esp6.d roOIs requee Iw pepaed shoul(, tou haeany qlesrions ptease tee iree {o conbcrlh€ oft@, - 4,4 "ryv l{.za, /44-- Far(g56) {37-6336 FL-'o."F"F.S FAX GOVER SHEET v Plar "Robie'Flore rah W Ftores -/lsb

IV

L '"D l -?1

Talu,a

it [\tt Fit dt 08t2f t201s CAUSE NO. PR-14.016 s 5 s 5 STARR COUNTY. TEXAS 5

NO'rICE OF ]NT.EIIT IO IA VID EO AND/OR OBAI. OEPOSIIIONOF ALANIZJR. -' i f iHl'€J5;i"#5-it1lllPi h€rarro'nev2orre-'id FrorE Fro€s. PLEASE taKE NOTICE ltr.{ lhe video afd/or or:r uep.sltion ot HLJGoalaNtz JR, w[ be €ken Fursuantb lhe provrsions ot Rutss2oo and 2o1. T*as Rlt€s ot Ctvil Procedne at L.w oftice ot Roet Rob . , Flores 3331 N Wa€ Rd, tL,tcAlten, Tqas 7OSOI . R€spondent in (he above captio^od dause wit tak6 the Vdeo ahdlor OBt Depositron of HUGO ATAN|Z JR., on Tu.sda

201 @Dunuiirq day lo dsy untitcomptered lr is hereby requesled thalrhep ainlf( H(/GO ALAN rz JR appearinsuch lhe and aa@ rorlhe purpose ofgivinghis deposiflo. h rhis calse, whr.h deposrtion, whe. hken. may belsed in 6vide.cedu.ing theh.atoJsajd c!se, and wiLtconlinue,@ day lo dat

The Fm oIRoet-Robie Fiores Em.ir robienorsr.w@6n..er Hon. RoE Robie Ftores sraG a.. No. 07167020 AIIo'ney IoT MARIA AoRIANA FLoRES

I csrdly lhat a tfue @py of ih6 N.)rtcE oF ITENT tO IA(E THE VTDEO drqgxl.J|r4oEpoStTtONOIHUGOALAN|ZJRw.setuoDy

ndd.(e6"riby

LGlnle. or by ena byc€. fied h.it, €ruh recejDt reffid 2015 E aa@tstuil@h Attoh.y lor MARTA AOaaANA FLORES SIEPHAN ,A) 2, 3_

. (h€ bsss oi(his rawsuir, preFred orreview€d prqro rhs deposir,oi in prcp;;;i-;;; ili;;;iJ,li;. Driver's Li.€n.e: A copy of yo!r cuftent !jrive.! L@nse.

5. names and.d,lr€sses of Iained possessQi, cusrody, o. co.rol (t1t<t to> causE No. PR'14-015 s s s s

STARR COUNTY, TEXAS DECEASED s AMENDED NOTICE OF INTENTTO TAKE THE VIDEO AND/OR OTLAL DEPOSITION OF SIEPHANIE RIOS STEPHANIE RIOS, Plamtiii. by and thrclgh hef allomeyolrecord, Flor E. Floes. 700 N. Flores Streel. Ste E Rio Grande CiV T€x€s 74542 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE thal ihe Vrdeo and/or Oral oeposnion of STEPHANIE RIOS

wiLl be taken pu6uanl io the prcv sions of Ru es 200 and 201 Iexas Ru es of Ovil Proc€dure al Law oftice of Roel "Robie F ofes 3331 N. Wa€ Rd MoAllen, Texas 78501 Respondenl In lhe abore captioned cals€ will lake the Video and/or OEL Deposilion oI STEPHANIE RIOS, on conlinu ng day to day unlilcompleted.

It s he€by reqlesled lhat the Plaintfl, S'EPHANIE Rlos appea. in such trme a nd place lorthe purpose ofgMng h6 depos tion in this cause, Mlich depos ton when laken may be lsed in €vidence dunng ihe t.ialof said cause, and wilconlinue from dav to day

Respectfuly submitled The Frm ofRoe "RobE" Fores (956) 631-7188 ofllce Emarl: @bieiorcslaw@alt.net Hon. Ro€l'Robie Flores srare BarNo 07167020 AIIoTney Io. MARIA ADRIANA FLORES

rJob ruober ?616r 6000! Certificate of Service I ceR'ry thal a 1ru6 @py of the AJITIENDED NollCE oF INTENT TO TAKE THE VIDEO AND,OR ORAL OEPOSITIoN OF STEPHANIE RIOS was seded on bv hand delivery, by fa6imile, or by email, bv @nified mai retum Eceipt €quesled each anom6v oi€cord or nyin aeodancewithlhe Texas Rules or Ovrl Pbc€durc on lhegldav Flor E Flores 7o0 N Flores st@t Ste E Rio G€nde city, Texas 78532 Fa* 956,263.1750 Emarl:tfl oeslaw@gmail com Gilbeno Falcon

^

Faxi(956)487-6336

Email:€neonandoqaza@gmail com

Ho.. Roel 'Robte" Flores Atlomey lor MARIA AoRIANA FLORES

r rob Nube. 7633r ao00e SUBPOENA DIJCES TECUM TO THE DEPOSITION OF

STEPHANIE RIOS

(EXHlBllA ) The term !o!'or 'deponent rele6lo STEPHANIE RIOS Ljnl€ss othee se specined the I'me w thin whLch maleials are soughl s the past len ( I0) vears Trelcms docur€rt! wr'lhos ano records ateu'sInl| s'rhibil r" lhen w lour limiraloa rhe lollowng lems '€odrdless of l:sromarr o-oaa .ense ano

'n.lloed ongm orlo€lion, whether prnred, re@rded, rilmed, or feprcduced bvanvoLher mechanica prccess or wnnen or poduced by h.nd whelher or nol clarded to be pdvieqed aga nst discovery on anyground, and whelhefan onsrnal master or copv

writt€n or Recorded stat€menl ofthe Pa.tv Proboundino lhissubb@na C-!.99€ !e!r!!4! any.nd a I slalements prevously made by lhe padY p@poundrng this subpoena duces lecum concernng the subject matler ol lhis lawsuit whch is n tha possession, cuslody, orco.tro lhe party lo *hom this subooena is drected ( Rlle 166b.2.q.). Forthe plrpose ollhE request. a sralemenl previous y hade is (a) a wrtten peBon makng . (b) a stenogfaphic mechani€|, eleclncalorother type ol r€codirq. or any t€nscriplion theeol which is a substani a ly velballm rec talof a slalement made bv lhe pe6on and contemDo€neo!slv recorded Photoaraphs: Each and every photogEph in vour possesslof orslbject lo vour @ntol and or dlv tqllve or anv'L'r pfolog aon '''prrl he€o'rsroi :vaibole $ nrch oeoicls r"ne6 €le rs 1l Io lh6 lawsJ I Fo'fepuDo+sorlhis subpoena, lhe lerm photograph would include the video pornon oi anv mouon pElue. vdeo-lape, or other recorded medra Pr€oaration forthis d€.osition: any and all documenls, repons pape6

3. coresponden@, pholog€phs. and nemoranda e thef i. vour possessron or the basis of thrs lamlit lnder yolr conlo re atrng lo lhe occlren@ mad€ p'epared or reviewed pnorto lhis depos't'on In preparatDn lor ih s dePosition

a copy ofyour curenl driver's rcense 5 Reports ofErpe.ts: Any and aildocuments and langible thrngs ncluding all lanqrble repofts, physi€lmodels, complications oi data, and olhermalenal prepared by an expeftwho may be called as a. etp€Ls lrialor deposilion i€siimony, and anysuch marenalprepared bv an expert used ror consullaron lnvestioator's Reports: The nafre a reDorts ofany private lnvesliqato6 empioved bvvou in @nn€c1ion witlr lhs ese Panies and wltn€sses: The names and addfesses ol anvpotenla partiesor

a witness€s lhatcan be oblained ffom any comfrunication orolher papeB In you possess on, custody, of conlol

LrqD .rb-A.76d6r 6ooro causE No. PR-la-016

IN

COUNTY COURT IN THE ESTATE OF 5 s s s

STARR COUNTY, TEXAS s DECEASEO AMENOED NOIICE OF INTENT TO TAKE THE VIDEO AND/OR ORAL OEPOSITION OF ARTEMIO RIOS JR, ARTEMIO RIOS JR., P ainLitr. by and lhDugh her altornev ol record, Flot E Floes 700 N. Flor€s steet Ste E Rio Grande Ctv T€ss 74542. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE thatlhe Video and/or 016l Deposition oIARTEMIO RIOS

JR. wil be taken purslanl lo the p@vsrons of Rlles 200 and 20r, Texas Rules oi Civil Prcced uE at Law otfice of Roel 'Robie Flores 3331 N. ward Rd McA len T€xas 74501 . Respondent i. the above caploned €usewilltake the Video andlor Oral Deposition of ARTEMIO RIOSJR,, on

Nd

ontrnurng day lo day untl@mpleted ll is hereby requesled lhal the Pantifl, ARTEMIo Rlos JR appearln such time and plaG for$e purpos6 ofgiving his deposilion in thrs cause, which deposition when taken, maybe used in evidence dunng the tdalolsaid cause, and willconlinue tom dav

Respecif ully s!bm'lted, The Fkm of R@l"Rob e'Flores (9s6) 631-7133 Oifce Ems r obienoeslaw@att.net Hon Roel'Robre' Flores stale Bar No 07167020 Atlomey IoT MARIA ADFIANA FLORES

r hh \uober 7636r o0002 Certificare of SeNice | @nfy lhai a lru€ @py ofine AMENDEO NOTTCE OF TNTENT TO TAXE THE VIDEO ANO/OR ORAL oEpOStTtON OF ARTEM|o R|OS JR, s serued on by hand delivery, bylaFimile, or byemai, by ceriified m.it, return re4ipl r€quested each anomey a@rdan@ with lh€ TeEs Rltes otCMtprocedue on ther4day or re@rd orparty

'n Flor E. Ftores 700 N FroEs Sreel Ste E RD Grande CiV, Tess ?85S2 Fak 956.263.1750 Email:filoedaw@gmait.com Rene ca@ Gilberto Far@n

^ Faxr(956x€7 6336 Emarl:reneodandogaa@smait.@m nz ru," lz,-- Hon. Ro6l "Robie' Flores Atlomey tor MARIA ADRIANA FLORES

rrob Nuber zi!6r Amol SUBPOENA DUCES'TECUM TOTHE OEPOSITION OF

ARTEMIO RIOS JR-

IEXHIBIT "A"I Thetem yo! or'deponeni releb to ARTEIT/I|O RIOS JR., Untess otheMise speciiied lhe lrhe wilhin which malerials a€ sought is the past ten O0) yea.s. The tems document. 'w llngs."afd ,lecords'aE used rn this exhrb rn lher clsloharyb.o.d sense and Inclldedwrthout rmtalon rhe following ilems. regad ess of onqin or localion, wheihef printed, recoded nlmed, orrepbduced by anyothe. mechanica pD@ss or winen or podlc€d bV hand whelher or not claimed io be pnvileg€d aoanstdFcoveryo. anygDund, andwhetheranonojnal, mast€r,o.@py.

Writt.n orRecorded Stalenontoflh€ Partv Proooundin. this subboena ducos lecum: Anyand alslatemenls pfeviously hade by lh6 pa popoundrng lhis slbpoena dues tecum concemrng lhe sublst natteroflhis lawsurl which is inlhe possession, coslody ordnto the parly to whom this subpoena sdirected. (Rule 166b.2.9.). Forrhe purpose ofths requesi, a slalement prevjously made is (a) a wnften pe6on making [ (b) a stenographc mechanica, electrca or oth6r lype of recording. o.any lEnscnp on theeol whch is€ slbslanlrally verbal m Gcita ofa statement made by the pe6on a.d contem@.ansuslv r*oded. Phoroor.ohs: Each and every pholograph in yolrpossession of subtedr to

2. your conl.ol, and/o. any negat ve ol any slch photograph, f€ pnnt thereofrsnot avai able, $h .h depicts mallers elevant to this lawslrl. For lhe purposes of rhis subpoena, the term photograph would hclude lh€ vdeo poftion of any dolioo pictlre, video-lape, or olher recorded media. Prcbaration for this d€position: Any and alldoc!nents. reporls, p6pe6,

3 @respondence, photographs, and memoanda, either r your possessionor under your contrclrelatng 1o the occuren.e made the basis oilh's laclit, p€pa€d or eviewed prjor to thE depostrion in pepaElion for this deposition. Orivei's License: A copy or your cutrenL dnveas lrcense

5 Rebo.is ofErp6rrs: Any and alldocuments and tafgblethings, ncLudrnq all tangible reporis, physica models. comphcalions oldata and other material prepaEd by an expen who may be.aled as an etperl's lrial or deposil on teslimony and anysuch malenalprepared byan €xpert used for.onsuhalion (even rf rt was prepared n anticipaL on of litigal on of lof lnar) the @nsuri ng expens opinions or impressrons have been €v ewed by a testitl.g expen. Invslioator's Reoorrs: The name addesses, telephone n!hbe6, and replris olanyp.ivate inveslgators empoyed byyou n conneclronwrlh this case. P.rties and Witnesses: The names and add.esses oI any potentiaL panies or w nesses that can be obtained iiom any communrcal@n orother papec In you possess on, custodv, or conrrol

rrob lulber 7o36r b0oo4 5ik >

I!11

causE No, PR-t+016 IN THE ESTATE OF IN COUNTY COURT s s ARTEMIO RIOS, s STARR COUNTY, TEXAS DECEASEO 5

AMENDED NOTICE OF INTENTTO TAKE THE VIDEO AND/ORORAL DEPOSITION OF HUGO ALANIZ JR. To: HUGO ALANIZ JR,, P aintiff, by and lhrouqh her adomey of r*ord, Flor E. Flores 700 N. Flores Slreel, sle E Rio Grande cV. TeEs 74542 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE lhatlhe Vldeo and/or O€lOeposition ot HUGO ALANIZ

JR. wlLlbe t ken DuBuanl lo lhe Drcvisions or Rures 2Oo and 201 Texas RuLes of CivI Pocedu€ at Law office of Roel Robie' Flores 3331 N Ware Rd, McA len, TeEs 78501 .

in the above captloned @usewilllake the Vids and/o. o€lo€posilion of R€spond€nt HUGO AI.ANIZ JR,, on

nd

@ntinuing day lo day unlilcomplel llishe€by.equested thatlhe Plarntrfi, HUGo ALANIZ JR, appearinsuch timeand placeiorthe purpose ofgiving his depos tion in thrs cause, wh ch depos tion, when taken, may be lsed in evidenc6 du.ing the l al ot said cause and will contrnue frcm day to day

Respecttutly subm(ed, The Fim of R@l'Robre" Flores (956) 631-7188 office Eha'l: @b'efl o€slaw@an.nel

srare Ba. No. 07167020 Anomey for MARIA ADRIANA FLORES

lrob Nubcr 76a6t 40005 Certificate ot Ssrvic. I ceniry thal a true @py olthe AMENOEO NOTICE OF INTENTTO TAKE tHE VIDEO AND/oR oRAL DEPOSITION OF HIJGo ALANIZ JR. was s€p€d on by hand delivery, byf.6rm e, orbyemail, byc€nined mail. relurn Ecelpt Equested each.ltom€y of r*od or party in a@rdanc6 wlth the Texas Rul6s of CMI Prccedure on the

ay

Flor E. Florcs 700 N Floes st€Et Ste E

GEnde city, Texas 73532 Far 956 263.1750 Emaif flloreslas@gmail.@m

ru " /1-. Gibeno Fal@n Fd: (956X€7$336

- ., Emarl:enedandosa%@smd @m Hon. Roel Robie" FloEs Aitoney ior MARIA AORIAIIA FLORES

trdb rrbef 7r!61 60006 SUBPOENADUCES TECUM TO THE OEPOSITION OF HUGO ALANIZ JR. (EXHta[ "A) Th6 tem'you or'deponeft, reters to HUGoaL-ANtzJR., untess olheMise specrled rhe lime wrlhin which maieria s are suQhl is the past len (10) yea6. The lems'doclments 'writhgs and 're.ords' are lsed in rhis exhrb h rhei. customary broad s6nse€nd Inctlded withoul rmitation lhefollowing tems, relardtess of ongrn o. ocalron, whetherprlnt€d, E6rded, timed, or reprcdu.ed bya.yother mechanrcalpo@ss ofwrinen orp.odued by hand wherherornol claned to be pnvibged againsr dlscoveryon anyground. and whelh€. an ongina . master orcopy,

WrlttenorR€cordedSt.tcmgntof theParrvprcpoundtnothtssub@ena popounding lhis subpoena d!c€s lecum @ncernrngthe subject maher of thts lareuil whEh is in lhe possessDn, custody, orconlrctrhe pany b whom thts subpoena 6 drccled (Rule ^[1] 66b.2 g ). For the purpose of rhis feqlest , a statement previolsy hade B (a) a wriften peMn makins ir, (b). sienogEphic. mechanr€|. elech€lo. olher type of record nq , orany tEnscrpl on lherml which isa substantrally vedatim recrlatofa statement made bvLhe oe6on and 6nremporaneously ecorded. Photoqralhsr Each and every pholosraph in yolrpossess@n orsubjecl ro

2. yourcont@|, and/orany negative ol ahysu.h photogEph ta pnnt thefeof is not ava lable, which depcls matteF .elevanr lo this tawsu . For the olrNses of this s-bpoera. rre tem phoroq.aph *ortd n. rude.Fe r'deo Don on ol anv mol,on pcrlre, vdeo-laoe. orolher re@rded media. prepaEtion forthls d6oosition: Anyand atdocufrents, repons, pape.s,

3 @despondene phologEphs, and memoranda. eithe.rn youf oossesson o. under yolr @n!rc| relatrns lo the occurenc made rhe basts oflhis awsuit prepa Ed or €viewed pno. b lhis depos tion n preparat on lor lhis deposit on. Driver's License: A copy ofVo!r c!rent dnvers ti@nse R€po.ts ofExo.rts: Anyand altdocuments and tangjbte lhings. r.cludrng all langiblereports, physi€l models,@mpticauonsordala,and othermalerial prepared by an erpen who may be called as an experl s kiator deposirion teslrmony. and anysuch materiat prepared by a. expe.l lsed forconsuttation (even if it was prepar€d in anlicipaton ot ftgaUon or lor tnaD it rhe @nsuttrng e4ens oprnons or mp€ssions have beeh r€viewed by a tesiitrng expert. Inv€stidalo.'s Reports: The name, add16sses, letephone numbe6, and repons or any pnvale invesligatoG employed by you In connectio. wrth lhrs €se

I

Parti€s and Witn6ss€s: The names and add.esses otany porenti€tDartes or witnesses lhat can be oblain€d

iiom any communicatof or possess on custooy, or conlrcl rrob ,ube, ?3e6r @0dd7 + A(a181tb causE No. PR-14016 IN THE ESTATE OF IN COUNTYCOURT 6 s

ARTEMIO RIOS, s s

DECEASED STARR COUNTY, TEXAS s

IMOTION

FOR CONTINUANCE TO THE HONORABLE JIJDGE OF SAID COURT: This MoTroN FoR CoNTTNUANCE is brought by ROEL ROSTE FLORES, Movant, on b6half ol MARIA AORIANA FLORES. In supporl olsad motion, Mo€n( I. Th6 case is pres€ntly sel for a hea.ing on September 1,2015, al9:00 a.m. in SlaE Counly, Texas. Movanl, co!.sel has prevrously noticed the opposing parlies in this ese,

2. and theylmpEpenyquash€d the deposillon, argurng lhey had b*n depose even though they were not deposed in lhis €se- Inaddiion, deposition are schedlled forSeptember l,2015 atS.00 6.m,10:30a.m. and 1.30 p.m. Movant!motonforconlrnuance6nolsoughlsolelyfordelaybd that justice

3. Movant p.a/srhe co-n granl rhe roi on lorconrnuan.e be qrarled.

R6sp6.lfully submlned, FLORES ATTORNEYS AT LAW Toi (e5€)631-7r€3 orficd Fax {es6) 6s1 7263 Fax

07167420 rrob Nurber r66dr 6ooor SaEh W. Flores stal€ Ba. No 24045340 Attom€ys for MARIA ADRIANA FLORES

CERTIFICATEIESE8!4CE

I enit ihar a ttue and @rect copy of lh€ roresoins l!!!tf:!olIoBleo!!MlA!:leE has be€n etued by hand dolivory, by lacsimlle, or by cedlne! mall, relum r@ipl requesled, on lhis rhe

dayorAugust, 2015 on the following: 700 N Frores slre€i Sle E Rio Gcnde City, IeEs 74532 Email;flloresla hall.@h Far (956)4875336 EmailrEner andoga@@ghail.@m

7668t 6000! lJob ^ub.r STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF HIDALGO

BEFORE ME, the undeFigned aurhority, petunaly appeaGd R@t " Robje" Bora , wllo, by he duly h, deposed asto tomi "My name is ROEL "ROB|E' FLORES, , am a ltcnEed anorney in the Slare or Texas and I am h€reby acquainted with the facts siated In the Motion tor Coniinuan€ | heeby state that the racrs h the Motion lor Continlan€ ae true and corect to th€ besr

sisned on Ausud/2, 201s. ROEL 'ROBIE' FLORES Slgn€d under oarh b€foe me lrob Nukf 766r) 60oos causE No, PR-1rt.016 IN THE ESTATE OF tN colrNw

s

5

ARTEMIO RIOS, s

DECEASED

STARR COUNTY. TEXAS s ORDER ON MOTION FOR CONIINUANCE ,2015, rhe Louil @nsdered tle Motor torconnnLance ol MARIA ADRIANA FLORES. Movani andordeB:thal lhis Mouon is GRANTED and tT lsTHEREFOREOROEREDth6lrheheanng is resetfol

,20r5,

M

20r5.

JUOGE PRESIDING

.c Roel "Robi." Ftores Fai (s56) 631,726S Email rob efl orestaw@au.f et 700 N FtoesStE€l ste E Rio Gr.nde City, Texas 78562 Far 956.263.1750 EFail:mo@staw@gmart @m Far. (9s€)447-6336 Emarl.cneonandogau@gnait com

rJob Nurb-r 7663r 6ooor

CAUSE NO

IN THE ESTATE OF 5 s

ARTEMIO RIOS, 5 s 5

DECEASEO TEXAS MOfION FOR CONiINUANCE TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: This MOTIoN FoR CONTTNUANCE is brolght by ROEL ^RoatE" FLoRES, Movant, on behalf ot MARTA ADRTANA FIORES. In suppod ot sad mohon, Movant L This case 6 presenuy set for a Jury Tnal hea.ing on September 3 201 5 al 9:Oo a.m.In StarCounty, Texas. Movant, counselhas lssued notEes ofdeposirion for rhe followrngw ness 2. Stephanie Rios. Adenio Rlos, Jr . and Hugo Alanrz Jr. and are eheduted lor Seplember 1,2015 al9.00 a.m,10130 a h. and 1:30 p.m.

3 Movanl, counsel is requesting addrhona limeto prepared fortnal. Movanlsmotonforconllnuanceisnoisoughlsot€tyfordetaybdthallustce 3 Movanl p.als lhe @un grantthe motion lofoontinlance be granted

R6sp6ctfuily submrtted

FLORES

ATTORN EYS AT LAW Ter: (e5€) 631 7133Oflrce Fax (s56)631-7263 Fax

BY:

Sble AarNo.07167020 Sabh W. Floros srate Bar. No 24045340 Anorneys for MARIA AORIANA FLORES

CERIIFICATE OF SERVICE l@nifylhai airueand corecl@pyof lh€ fofego ng MOTION FORCONNNUANCE has b€en eNed by hand deliv€ry, by facslmie, or by certili€d mail, €turn €ceipt Eque(ed. on rhis lhe Al day orAugusl, 2015 on the followinq: 700 N Flor6 Slr6etSle E Rio GBnde Cay T.xas 78582 Emairfiloreslaw@ghail.6h Ehailx€neorlandosa%@shail.com

rJdb Nurber 7313r 40003 STA]E OF TEXAS COUNTY OF HIDALGO

BEFORE ME the undgr€igned autho.ity, peBonat/yappeaed Roei. Robie" Ftores , wlro, bym€ duly m, deposed as folowsi 'My name is ROEL "ROBTE FLORES, I am a ti@nsed ailorney in rhe siaie of TeB and | .m her€by acquainied $th th€ facts staled in the Moflon for Continuan@. I hereby stale lhal th6 f6cts n th6 Motion tor continuan@ a.€ true and 6red to the b€st

Siqred on Aususl ,2015. ROEL'ROBIE" FLORES Sjgned under oath beto€ me IN THE ESTATE OF

IN

COUNTY COURT 5 ARTE |o RIOS, 5 s

DECEASED

STARR COUNTY, TEXAS 5

N MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE

2015. rhe coun consid€red

lh€ Molron forcontrnuance ol llrARlA ADRtAitA FLORES, MovanL and odeEi thal rhrs Motjon is GRANTED and tT lS IHEREFORE ORDEREDtha hehea.ing is €ser.o-

201s, SIGNED ON 2015. JUDGE PRESIDING F i(956)631-726S Email bbi€f torestawasl.,ner 70O N Flor€s StE€r Ste E Rio cEnde Chy, Teras 7OSS2 En|ail;no.€sraw@gmait.com Ehair:reneonandogau @qm.it @m

rJob Nubsf 76d3t odoro Filed: 8/31/2015 10:45:48 AM Dennis D. Gonzalez County Clerk Starr County, Texas Lilly Guerrero

CAUSE NO. PR-14-016

IN THE ESTATE OF § IN THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW § ARTEMIO RIOS, § SITTING AS A PROBATE COURT § DECEASED § STARR COUNTY, TEXAS APPLICANT’S RESPONSE & OBJECTION TO

INTERVENOR’S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:

COMES NOW, Applicant STEPHANIE RIOS , and files this Response and Objection to Intervenor’s Motion for Continuance, and in support thereof will show unto this Court as follows: I. Procedural History On May 1, 2014, Applicant STEPHANIE RIOS filed an Application for Appointment of Dependent Administrator in this Court under Cause No. PR-14-013, styled In the Estate of Artemio Rios on May 1, 2014. See attached Exhibit “A.” On May 28, 2014, Applicant further filed in this Court an Application to Determine Heirship under Cause No. PR-14-016, styled In the Estate of Artemio Rios . See attached Exhibit “B.” Applicant STEPHANIE RIOS was Artemio Rios, Decedent’s, biological daughter. See attached Exhibit “C.”

On August 1, 2014, Intervenor MARIA ADRIANA FLORES filed a Petition in Intervention for Determination of Right of Inheritance and an Opposition to Application for Letters of Administration both under Cause No. PR-14-016. See Exhibits “D” and “E.” These matter has been set for a hearing on the following dates since Intervenor’s filing of her Petition in Intervention: January 15, 2015; February 19, 2015; March 19, 2015; and March 26, 2015 . Applicant was prepared to proceed on the Appointment of Administrator and Determination of Heirship, and all hearings were reset at Intervenor’s oral and/or written Motions for Continuance , and all over Applicant’s objections .

The hearing on March 26, 2015 was set by the Court to proceed with all pending matters. Intervenor again made a request for a reset and the Court granted said request, also over Applicant’s objection. At that hearing, Court instructed the parties to enter into a Docket Control Order and set the case for Trial. Applicant made attempts to confer with Intervenor’s counsel to select a trial date and enter into a Docket Control Order. See attached Exhibits “F” and “G.” Intervenor’s counsel never responded to said requests.

Consequently, Applicant filed a Motion for Docket Control Order on June 10, 2015 and said motion was set for a hearing on August 20, 2015. A Docket Control Order, setting this case for a Special Trial on September 3, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. was signed by all counsel of record and by this Honorable Court. See attached Exhibit “H.” Said Docket Control Order dictate the deadlines in this case.

During the time of the filing of the Intervention and the signing of the Docket Control Order, Applicant engaged in discovery, as Applicant disputes Intervenor’s claim that she was Decedent’s common law wife. Applicant served Intervenor with Requests for Disclosures, First Set of Interrogatories, Requests for Admissions, and Requests for Production. See attached Exhibit “I.” Due to Intervenor’s failure to timely respond to said discovery, Applicant filed a Motion to Compel and for Sanctions and Intervenor was ordered to respond to the discovery by July 30, 2015.

In her discovery responses, Intervenor for the first time identified several witnesses who allegedly have knowledge of the common law marriage. Applicant immediately requested and by agreement, obtained dates to depose and later deposed three witnesses and Intervenor. See attached Exhibit “J.”

During the same period of time between the filing of her Petition in Intervention and the signing of the Docket Control Order, Intervenor has engaged in zero (0) discovery . Now, days before the Trial, Intervenor has attempted to Notice Depositions of Applicant and her sibling, and a non-party. Intervenor attempts to notice depositions outside the discovery period and improperly served the notice on the non-party. In her Motion for Continuance Intervenor alleges that “counsel has previously noticed the opposing parties in this case, and they improperly quashed the depositions, arguing they had been deposed even though they were not deposed in this case.” Intervenor’s statements are incorrect as the only depositions previously quashed were those noticed in Cause No. DC-13-971, not in PR-14-013 or PR-14-016. Applicant filed her first Motion to Quash in this case on August 28, 2015 on the ground that said depositions were noticed after the discovery deadline had passed but also because Intervenor failed to come to an agreement on taking of depositions, improperly noticing the deposition of a non-party, and failing to meet the requirements of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure in scheduling depositions.

Prior to the above-referenced filings, Applicant STEPHANIE RIOS filed a wrongful death suit in the 381 st Judicial District Court under Cause No. DC-13-971, styled Hugo Alaniz, et al v. Anderson Columbia, individually and on behalf of her father, ARTEMIO RIOS’ estate. The lawsuit was filed within thirty (30) days of the death of ARTEMIO RIOS , Applicant’s father. That case was set for trial and a continuance was granted. It was later reset, and Trial is currently for October 19, 2015. See attached Exhibit K.” The parties in that suit have engaged in extensive discovery, including the taking of many depositions of witnesses and experts. The parties intend to proceed to Mediation in late September 2015, as per the last discussions between the parties’ attorneys. Intervenor MARIA ADRIANA FLORES filed an Intervention but her Intervention was stricken upon Defendant’s Motion to Strike. Although having been in that case for almost a year, Intervenor engaged in little to no discovery in that case and failed to participate in any of the depositions taken to date. Any further delay before this Court will cause extreme prejudice to Applicant, as the parties are preparing for mediation and trial in the wrongful death suit and must dispose of the common law marriage dispute and obtain the administration of the estate of Decedent prior to mediation and Trial in the wrongful death suit.

II. Response & Objection to a Continuance “It is well established that the granting or denial of a motion for continuance is within the trial court’s sound discretion.” Villegas v. Carter , 171 S.W.2d 624, 626 (Tex. 1986); State v. Crank, 666 S.W.2d 91, 94 (Tex. 1984). “The exercise of discretion will not be disturbed on appeal unless the record discloses a clear abuse of discretion.” Id. “It is also well established that the failure of a litigant to diligently utilize the rules of civil procedure for discovery purposes will not authorize the granting of a continuance.” Fritsch v. J.M. English Truck Line, Inc. , 151 Tex. 168 (Tex. 1952). “A trial court will not be required to grant a motion for continuance, at the risk of committing error in overruling it, when the allegations in the motion examined in light of the record show beyond cavil a complete lack of diligence…” Id. at 858. “A party who does not diligently utilize the procedures for discovery can seldom claim reversible error when the trial court refuses a continuance.” State v. Wood Oil Distributing, Inc. , 751 S.W.2d 863, 865 (Tex. 1988).

Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 247 states that “[n]o cause which has been set upon the trial docket of the court shall be taken from the trial docket for the date set except by agreement of the parties or for good cause upon motion and notice to the opposing party.” Tex. R. Civ. P. 247; Tex. R. Civ. P. 251 . The rules further state that “[t]he failure to obtain the deposition of any witness residing within 100 miles of the courthouse or the county in which the suit is pending shall not be regarded as want of diligence when diligence has been used to secure the personal attendance of such witness under the rules of law….” Tex. R. Civ. P. 252 . Rule 252 further requires that “if a continuance is sought to depose a witness, the motion must include the following information: 1.) the witness’s name and address (street, county, and state of residence); and 2.) a description of the testimony the witness will probably give and what the party expects the testimony to prove. Id.

Furthermore, in Wood , Wood asked for a continuance…to take depositions of the State’s witnesses. State v. Wood Oil Distrib., Inc. , 751 S.W.2d 863 (Tex. 1988). Wood had not conducted discovery during the two years in which suit was pending. Id. The Supreme Court held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion because Wood did not prove diligence. Id. The Court said that Wood’s inability…to take the deposition of State’s witnesses was ‘a predicament of its own making.’ Id.

Like in Wood , Intervenor’s petition was filed over a year ago. During that period of time, Intervenor has failed to conduct any discovery. Now on the eve of trial, Intervenor attempts to notice depositions, after the discovery deadlines have passed, and without proving any due diligence in attempting to conduct discovery or procure depositions of the witnesses.

Moreover, Intervenor’s motion for continuance is not in substantial compliance with the rules. Rule 252 requires that “when requesting additional time for discovery, a party must fulfill six requirements under oath: 1.) the testimony is material; 2.) proof of materiality; 3.) show of diligence; 4.) cause of failure, if known; 5.) evidence not available; 6.) continuance is not for delay only but so that justice be done. Tex. R. Civ. P. 252 ; Verkin v. SW Cent 1 , 784 S.W.2d 92 (Tex. App. 1990). Intervenor’s counsel filed a motion for continuance and attached an affidavit to said motion. In his affidavit, Intervenor’s counsel simply states “I am hereby acquainted with the facts stated in the Motion for Continuance.” The motion itself states that “counsel has previously noticed the opposing parties in this case, and they improperly quashed the depositions…” It further states that “depositions are scheduled for September 1, 2015 at 9:00 a.m.; 10:30 a.m. and 1:30 p.m.” Applicant contends that Intervenor failed to comply with Rule 252 in that she has completely failed to show any diligence in obtaining depositions within the year that her intervention has been pending; has failed to completely state a cause for her failure to do so; has failed to show that evidence was not available during that year; and has failed to show how her request for a continuance is for anything other than to delay the case and cause prejudice to Applicant. Intervenor has further failed to state in her motion for continuance “the type of information sought” in the depositions she attempts to notice. Gabaldon v. General Motors Corp. , 876 S.W.2d 367, 370 (Tex.App.—El Paso, 1993, no writ). Intervenor’s motion for continuance also fails to state that the discovery period has expired .

Intervenor’s motion for continuance is devoid of any showing of due diligence in procuring depositions of witnesses in this case. In fact, Intervenor has failed to satisfy the requirement and describe the attempts she has made in a period of one (1) year to secure discovery of evidence.

Applicant STEPHANIE RIOS will be prejudiced with the granting of a continuance in this case. Applicant is preparing her wrongful death suit for mediation in September 2015 and Trial in October 2015. The delaying of this case will prevent mediation and trial to proceed in her wrongful death suit. Intervenor has had more than sufficient time to conduct discovery and obtain evidence to prove her alleged claim of common law and has failed to do so. Applicant has diligently conducted discovery, secured evidence, and procured witnesses to dispute Intervenor’s alleged claim of common law marriage to Applicant’s deceased father while Intervenor has caused nothing but delays in these proceedings.

III. Prayer WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED , Applicant STEPHANIE RIOS , ask this Court to deny Intervenor MARIA ADRIANA FLORES’ motion for continuance, and for such other and further relief to which Applicant may be justly entitled to, in law or in equity.

Respectfully Submitted, T HE L AW F IRM O F F LOR E. F LORES , P LLC 700 N. Flores St. Rio Grande City, Texas 78582 Tel. (956)263-1786 Fax. (956)263-1750 Email: ffloreslaw@gmail.com

BY:

/S/FLOR E. FLORES Flor E. Flores State Bar No. 24065235 Counsel for Applicant Stephanie Rios L APEZE & J OHNS , P LLC 601 Sawyer Street, Ste. 650 Houston, Texas 77007 Tel: (713)739-1010 Fax: (713)739-1015 Email: chris@lapezejohns.com

BY:

/S/CHRIS K. JOHNS Chris K. Johns State Bar No. 24002353 Co-Counsel for Applicant Stephanie Rios

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Flor E. Flores, hereby certify that on this the 31 st day of August, 2015, a true and correct copy of the foregoing Applicant’s Response & Objection to Intervenor’s Motion for Continuance, has been upon all parties of record in accordance with the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

VIA ELECTRONIC FILING

VIA EMAIL: gilberto@gilbertofalconlaw.com Gilberto Falcon

T HE L AW O FFICE O F G ILBERTO F ALCON , P LLC 320 Lindberg Ave.

McAllen, Texas 78501 Attorney for Intervenor

VIA ELECTRONIC FILING

VIA EMAIL: robieflores@att.net Roel “Robie” Flores F LORES A TTORNEYS AT L AW 3331 N. Ware Rd.

McAllen, Texas 78501 Attorney for Intervenor

VIA ELECTRONIC FILING

VIA EMAIL: garzalawoffice@aol.com Minerva Garza

T HE L AW O FFICE O F B ALDEMAR G ARZA & M INERVA G ARZA 200 E. Second St. Rio Grande City, Texas 78582 Attorney Ad Litem

/S/FLOR E. FLORES

FLOR E. FLORES

LBEoruro-/* .AUSE No. fl '* [L/^e I

l

Ai]n c0. TX

DENNI$

nv'

iIN'THE IIS]'A'|E O}' u, couv2:$ 6 RT n

ARTE1WIO ruOS. AT woF

E

$

Deceosed R STA COI]NTY. TE.XAS .A"PPI,IC.4, FOR INTMB OFD NDENT ADMI]:{IST TO TIilE HO,NORAI]]LE JIJDGE OF COURT coi'{Es NO\4/, STEPITANIE LEE RIOS. A icant, and files tliis A lication for Approiirtnir:rLt o1'Depe.'rlerit Administrator of the Estate o RTEIVIIO RtrOIi, Dec for ased. and icar-rse of actLon vlill show unto this Coult rlrc fnltn*,i... I rrr\. r.vtrvYYlllE;. i tJ, i l^ I

Appirc;ant is an individr,ral domiciled in and resid at 1830 Guadalupe S , Rio Grande .ir Ulty, lexas 78582, Starr County, Texas, and is acting i 1^' , this matter by and tlt Lrgh heL duly .r authorlzed rel)resentatir/e, Tlie applicant is the c'leceden I daLrghtel and hzrs ar.r terest in the iestate of AR.TEItdIOT R.IOS, Deceaseci. il.

i

Derre'dent die,J on November 30,2013 in Rio Gra : City, Stalr County, Te[as at the age iof 39 yearsr, T'he decedent died inrestate.

I

ilL

I

This Cour:t ha.s jr.rrisdiction and veltlle is pr.oper. be .rse A|I'REMIO liiXOS lDeceased was at the tine of deiith in

I ltaru CoLrnty. I

IV, I Deoedr:nt owned. property described generally as I propelty with an unkr]own value at the time of filing this appiication. '

Decedent owned property describecl generally a rersonai propertl, ovitfr lan unknown value ait the tirne of filing this application, l

I

Apftlicant, on behalf of Decedent, frleci a vwoltg cleath sLrit clui.e,ntly nincling rinder Cause No, trCl-l '.)-g71, in the 381,r J'dicial District CoL, Stalr Cor,rnty, Te><as, folr clamages in i^^. pxcess ot One Miliion Drollars ($1,000,000.00),

i I I

r

i

iofshins to de,ceden of each heir to EPII4NIE LEE RIOS (Daughter) ei 181 ngle ] , 130 Gu{datulpe St, o Granfle City, Texas 7glg2

I .:' Couirty,'lexas i io Rros, JR. (,sor)

.\ /) Lza

l i

ol t: 0 Guapdupe St, Grande Ciry, Texas 7g5g2

Coufty, liexas VL i' .[ar as $nown by the applicant at the time of tf fiiing of this appljcatio . the follor,ving rresunflibly born to the decedent, but pater.nity dispLlted: rY Rrot; rde l

filing of this applicatio , ARTEMIO

WII,

inter-Qst in Decedent,s estate requires in diate appointmeut of a Dependent or'. ,A.F.'[EMIO RIOS has diecl without lea t1g a Will. The indivicl ls uamed in lion cbrLstitute all of the Decedent,s heir.s diitLibutes and ha lour in this and agfee on the advisability of having a De ent

PHANIE

f4,dministr.arion. has lbde:n dr:signated by the known heirs at of lecedent to serve Dependent r, l'lie distributees request that no action aken in this Court on ation to the 1'the decedent's estate other than the return o inveptory, appraisem t, and list of e deoehent's estate and settle ail pending c. s fo4 money dam on behalf of the issuance nd service of lnity isr dis

ed have beelt to administr"ati n, and admi strator of this estate shourlcl be given foii r1g powers: 'lake and possession of Decedent's including, burt state, perso ancl real property. I'ay and all debt owed by Decedent at the f ris death. .eo t Decedent in any and all litigation ino ---D rol to Decedent, Decedent in litigation alising out o nt's wrongir_rl d h against any fe;ndants which may be liable to rn said wrongful death. admi strator should be appointed inistrator. pursu t to Section of te Code.

VI

ERE RE, PREMISES CONS]IDERBD. EPFI NIE RIOS, Ap licant herein, rci th n be issued as r.equired by law and t appl t be iminedia Iy appointed rator o I)ecedent's estate. fuiiy Lrbrnitted, IRM OF FION E. FlonEs,

700 Flores St,, Ste E. Rio

nde ty, Texas 18582 Tel: ( )26 -1786 Fax:

)zo -1150 No,24065235 or Applicant

v nr; 3:ziflLE|or*ufu CAUSE NO. Dcfitil$ Blt

c IN TT.A] EST'AT'T] OF' IN $ s woF

AFTEIMTIO rrlo$,

A1

$ $

Dfcerserd COUNTY, TIF]XAS $

I

llhe followin,g Applicernl STEPI-IANIE RI furnishes the {ollowing information toithe Court: 1, AR'IIIMIO RIOS ("Decedent") died November 30, 2013, at the age of 39 in fralcort Heiights, S'tarr County, Texas. 2., ,,A Dependent Administration upon t's estate is pendifig before this af Arteznio Rios. Itlis in the best Cdtut u:irrler Cause No. PR-14-13, styled trn the Es interesit o:F thLe Estalie for the Court to determine w are the heirs and onlV heirs of the Decederrt.

3, or a part of Decedent'd Estate. The ,,4,ppliicant claims to be the owner of IaCt three dqpb of *re social'secr:rity nunrber of The last three digitslof her Texas Identilit:ration Card, arc 162.

4. The rrames and residerrces of all of heirs, the relatiqnship of each hei:: to Dececilent an,cl the tue interest of the Appl and of each of {he heirs i:r the Estate of Decedent Dre iari l;ollqws:

RIOS,IR.

Niun,e: pe Circle A<ldless: City, Texas78582 Relatiorship: (50%) Percent $hape of Reai ProPertY: (50%) Percent Share of Personal ProPertY: Narn,e:

Guadalupe Circle Add:ress: Gty, Texas 78582 Relalionship: (50%)Percent Shdre of Real P. roPertY: ln lltt E$tnte of ltrtmtio .Rioa, DeeCenl At'pltcaH on io Deletsrine HetuehiP

0/2015 3:34Pti lJ0h Hutnber 1212] Et0001 \c Share of Personal ttoperty: (50%) Percent A.t the time of Decedent's deaih, 5. own€rd property as Iol-lows: REA]L PROPERTY a. f)escription:

the real properly where bhe same is .A house ted at 206 lMrrite Rock Loop, Rio Sitr:ated Grande , Texas 78582 a'rrd described as Lot

Alto Vieta Phase Iil in pending 47, litigation this Court und.er Cause No. CC- t3-580. Iteal

Tyrper 'V;alrte:

{i6o000.00 PITILETONAL PR9PERTY a. iDrscription:

Iiurniture, , and personal belongings. 'Ilrprt: I'ersonal Value: lJnknown lietdement Itoceeds from pending b. for the Decerlent's wrongful <lerath pendrrrg in the 3g1st Judicial Court in Crruse No. DC-73-97'L, urilarown amotrnt but d.arnages are ln excess of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00).

6. The listing of heirs includes any liv child of the ciecedent. Decedent AI{'IEM|I(J $IOIS vras not predeceasedby achild. 7, Aprprlicant STEPHANIE RIOS states another person rnay clairn to be an heir and tcr lrave :ur interest in Decedent's estate but hasnotbeenestablished. The narre of sairl allegerl heir, whose pabeinify is ilispu is as fo,[ows:

a. I{arne: AilfY RIOS I).O.8.: November4,7998 A,ddress: Inspiration Rd.

Mission Texas 8, At the time of his death, Decedent not nnarried. Deced,ent was the r;ubject <f a <livorrce proceeding under Cause No, 1-108 hut Decedent, in his lifetime, daimed nev{.'r to hflve married, A divorce was filed clairning a cornrnon law )n the Estaln oJ llvtemia Rios, Decedent Applicnticr:n lio l)eterrnini€ Heirchlp

?0/201fi $'35p1'1 [Jsb Number 72121 El000Z l3r

YJ

miarriage whish Der:edent later disputed in the case filed underr Caube No. CC-13- 580.

tr, Al.l chillrenborn to or adoSxed, by Fravebeeniisted. Eachmarriage of]Dececlent lhas been listed. J.0, To lhe lrcst of my knowledge, died intestate. 1.1, This Application does not omit by the Texas ion reg'nired Probarte Clodr-., $rrctircn 49. 1)2. Ttrerewere no debts owed by that were secured by iiens upon reai estate, 1.3. Ttrir; .,{pplication contairrs all of the ial {acts and circumstafices within might reasonably terrd to show the thp knowledge rurd. irdormation of the Applicarrt heirs, il: the time or place of death or time o'r place, oJ dea.th or the names or residences of y known to the Applicant. thb namen or residences of all the'heirs are not RIOS, Applicarrt. Prays

I,VHEREIF()]RE; PREMISES CONSIDERED' hereof, this Court determine who that ci.tation isstte a,s::equired by law; that upon ghares irrrd iriterests in this are the h,eirs; and only heirs of Decedent and their Estate; imd that neceosity exists for an

submitted. : oFFLOR E. FLORES, P.I,LC. THE Lew St., Ste. E 700 N. City, Texas 78582 Rio 1786 Tel:

t75A Fax: e

L.

No.24065235

y for Stephnnie Rios Ii tto Estete ol.hftenia Flios, a Appticalion to Deter.filne Hehchip 0/2015 3:35P1'1 f J0b Hurnber 7272'l [fi0003 I CAUSE NO. $IN COUNTY COURT IN THE ES]TATE OF $ woF $AT

AR'IE]VIIO FIIOS, $ . COUNTY, TT]XAS ST Dmeasetl O RtO$, Appiican0 having I, SITEPHAN'IIIRIOS, onbehalf of tlreEstate knowrr to rrre, all of the allegations been cluJly s\ zorrL herr=by state on oath thal: insofar true;in substance and in faci and of the fc,rego'ing Appiication to Determine knowlerdge, been omitted from the that no nraterial. fact or circumstance has, within Appk:ation.

ME on this rhe P ? d daY of !}}VOBN 'TO AND SUBSCRIBED of ARTEMIIO RIO5, to certrfY May, 2f114 by STEPIIANIE RIOS on behalf of the which rrvi,tnerss rny hand and seal of office' State of T

t{Alilrt 0 RooRl6ufz Notary Expires; Jlbo*c.-f d\-Zgle-- Hy cornill|rlon Erplrur MvC Jrnurry E. ^[2015] fr rnt fr6tu oT Arwnia.Rios, Dacvdent Spplication to DeterrrLine lleirohip

0/2015 3:35P1'l IJ0b,Hutnber 7212] @0004 Filed: 8/31/2015 10:45:48 AM Dennis D. Gonzalez

County Clerk Starr County, Texas Lilly Guerrero loi IHb.LAWOFFICEOFFIORE Page:2110 Dare: ^[81112014] 2:59:58 PM From: Lr3wOtlcesolOrloertofalcono . **?iii:**+ri .# it i'l*" i 's*'- '.\,t :i,,tiii i:i ,i tili,rt *:i&Ltss $$#,. Ifrl. "Y$"{iw S €':-fl + gs s1g; 'i]i+;H *.',.*i;5 S*YY' # k*.i i!-\lr*i 'F" \ "&g L"ev.s ':rt

I

* A gq.?"ffi ,E#i{3 ffi^!*I},$,, qr &

s-liFg: s,,8.fftH"fl\ bt rF\$. w !-nidtk.5J' ,e S $l q-l<}r

",J $St)-V "'y S:,\t$i$ )(-:' wff E$infi ft .J*{"3$$"5SR}&SS..iffi S-.fl #ffi *i*$-3H,*ffi g.r #r$'3:_#_tr"ffiss&ffi*sss T'$ YF*# ${#S439*F"*LS -$Lrg}S,* fl}r"}:F*$S *_*:r} fii*;'ili r*i +\S$\" R:$,fi$S" -& W{F}6$re. Fe$&${*e& ftiiAs3}3&L,HF{-* F$*#RHS. n,$ ifiteruoeni:r *ss*lr":, fiies i*'iis ii'rt*:q=,pe*ti*r: s*# i*.l: :'r*l' l":gt$fi,Ei';:e*icx,r *f i"i*frt: *f i*ji*ritets:i+* #i'iis'"isi:rit tr: Secl?i*r: t*t iiSA *t' ttt* i:b:f *:t*s. tiq:ir*e **** ii**pe*tLiiiy tYt*i: fr^.l {{e'ii$i .i"r i:i : 'I. is['"$'m:$i$$*"*,N*H $q${i?S i.rn* f{}** salx d\F$iii{r

{li-T t{:t i.}*$.*rr-'*rn*l |'d*irw["rig: i* fhin **tisn u{r$ r*rty *{} "$r}r'o,,us,# $,ii*-r l}tlti*e *i t*is $is.s t."u" il,tiir"ig .,..iJ iy:4ilri{ 'i,+ h,sg i,jtttitr,"r}*y, Fl*r F:. .F{r*e*, *t ?r"}i} hi, $:{nr*c *it., "$tr+. f:, f{irr Gli}${s+ {,; *:.nr*.s, 7,$$$r?" $4^S,tTffiSS.{.{3 R$'#,S. Jr". . "1. ,, h*.s fiieN:i :*"wsf',.lffir"+i selrur*l* *f {:*e n**:li*eti*s: i t)'d Sjifftrd,{F$.N,$ff F{t**W$. F{* sne.3r $s ; .*$w*c$ art his g*u$iires_$, "i$13$ {}*s.daii"*pe *i,;+ie, iq: t3rs,r:ri* rlitir, "$'c+xm$ ?ligggp. &my l'tilcrm h;r+ ix;t*"s.ticiurtui* intsr*st ft: this pi-r:c,ee*ir.rg * **."iii*{ r*rr*{ heir"+f siSTffiSS$ R*t-$. ,f . V'c*iliJtlr ixi pr*gr*r ir:: E*is **l;S h*uwi;*e * i'li w{frs CI: r*,}rcidsil}t *f .$tsiry l$*a;nly, 1-q*:rs*w, 'i.

, i!" I trm $*E:*,triE*s:t'$ r-isrit{r is .6S{FS&T${+ *cE*#c-{*$t cii*eJ ei* ${*v.em[:*r" SS. ft E'i S, $q iFwifir*i": fimigql'r'fs. $*xr"r" {.tg:r:E :ily. T*xenr:r, *+" T{i 'l.rr ii:'*+l h.a-r*-:wi*dg,,* ert'xp5iii*rarif, y.f:* u *',*iir ,;..ii*c* i*t*r+te+ti. i+ienrl*$ nir:l \s.'ilX. i: " &i:i F l i{;,ffi rri II*-TS. Ft $,'\ *'}Sie,*+ L\,& *- ig !R,& F; $- Lq*" .!*p;t kle;'r* {,.:{y iq"€Y R{:SS. "e F;aS* "i *:i This fdwas senl' ih cFl FaxMaker fax sereL For more vrsif htp:/ ilvvw.gfi.com L/2014 3:03PM lJob Number 66531 @ooOZ fiom LawOflices ofGiIbeNo Falcono To: THE LAW OFFICE OF FLOR E l '-, I l : !

, fs-qi{$$$ *{ i?*f Ls.*', .?*th, Migsig*. t*ide 'ty, i-*xs$ Y$*fX. &$#V R$*S is ir-:txi *!"rilid *f ****de*i er:* fuI,*ri* tvt*g* fi# i*r**q $. ,r"r,t th** ti:ue r:f i':i* ***th, Se*e*$e*t *i:* F*rs*nxt pr*p**ty l*cstsd in l'*.*i *:**tvi, 'l*s.ua$, es wgi! *g a *lei*t in *e -'t 3'$?i, *ffi1*' Jridisi*i *irtrict f\8ft $tsrn {i.}cl*l:ty, T*x*s. F. Ths nfffirl#$, RS*$, mx* *cJdres,$es e*f ee

i$ tit* e$**cts*ss'rt, tl"r* rslwii*nsi"lip t!*r ir*rrr {* the de$edenf., enei tire true inter eF.}p{t*snl **"rrt *eruf't hgjr in the vti nt'g **tmter fir* s$ f*ll*vEs; lhi*rl*e: {}$u uir. f'nh:"r Ad*re*s; ii:po {i[rsle, {tis} Srande ;-t ! rffi$[$fi Ftmlr*ti*rr*hip: {iherw nf c'sa$ Br$Frerty: $iftelre *f p#r*cnal pr*p*lty: Nlsrne.

K[e*s. Adsrirese: {ugte S[ne{*, F{i* Srande *ity. i'J 7ffiSS* ^[1] N*lmtirlnship. Sft,er* *f r*al g:r*perty: t, .$h*rs *f p*.r*on*l pr*p*rtyr

1, hlmms: ,4,,*{rirt**s. &.{i**J*rr, l"exge f"t*_r

s?? iid 1F,eia*$ier*,ei"ilp: $hare c# remi pr*Ferry: $fr*re *f pero*n*i pr*peny*:

. Tlte rietc*$$fi{ wme ict*rrisd t* Xp*hi$ t vneff*es*.#ffis $sryngnated b5r aft{$ Ths i*iece**errt w**. s*hs*qx**"ttiy r:.:*l ti] F*,{*,-i* frieit* #mr*i&, Brt* t*.rat svi**i **r*irinet*d <*c ".luiy 5, A*1 '1, by ct;reqri-** errfer*ci i* nleu,*g i$q. F*ge * *f Thi s fa( was sent wih cFl Fad\4aker fax seNer For visit com L/ 20 4 3:04PM lJob Nunber 6659I EOOoa 410 Date:8nnq142:59:58PM r*l;L€wcrmcesotG'r:_:Faorc ro:rHELAwoFFrctoFFLoREFL( j ii ll ii ** O {i*r;*iy- **i-u*: s'i Lsw *f .*ierr ,I+r,:r-at3 is l,ti*rus{'r{ii l':gs h**:"1 gttt$*rrclsd l*-*.*, tfe* U[*s* i,:r$p *e a*$'rirsr *iesll] $f **r''rms]* ]ak , **f ,$irm r**-***' rr*t *#v* e*v f{rlheir isr$*ryy[ntir:ri !i'r tfrs? i*gmr*. Sa+h kn*w;.. r'; *f fi:s* r$S*.*#*r'rt *** h**rl iieted li .r*J

l $'ii ,i;,hi!'it*n b*rn tn +r ad*pl*d *"y 'r *nt hsvw *e*s'l list*d ill ihis *frttlerti*r: *#. in{erue**r hes *mitte*J th€ f*ii*\Ming i*1 i'n,*iTi n i*q*ir-ed i:v $e*tia:rts ?**.*Sd, ] g+A.tlf$ *9 tf*m 'Y"*v;*x ffis'cCItss Ctscie. fr*nr tiris ap J t Afr anppii*mti** f*r independenf edwi i* p*mdi,ng lrefelr* tl'llm *c.ust tf,s u***f {he $ar,vrs r.*srs* n*rrrirar. i;-rtsrve***r nffiwscl *rrx s $*rty in t*e a$nt iJ *ntrwti*n p rrw*ee$i *g* .

*rffysr fnr Re 'flter*rft:re, ffir\R$Jq $6AGSALHNA F$*W6{ I frie*qi *,*i *e.xt ;&'RsY R[S$-

T{

Mf.NS[.{, rmwp**tf*ily roc1r.***ts t*at ft* t}Rst**s t *i tf':is Fle.m i*{t *f t$re fitirn64 ir: $*teruf**i*$, 6fid that u6*r": finel ir*ari*$, th* c*+l; *. *]s*fwrnrirt* a*# **ts$f$sl"i wlrei i* **iit* distriltr*ti** utf ths.* ssf.sgs $f i se**$[rtf Sffi]nH*#{ffi R$S$; l I :i- Sruts.n'yri*m mnd *ste*liieh ihe right i:f irrix *{'&$S\$ ffi.$.*S $CI * *frsrm *f sfle *.e*ee{[*t'x *ryt*te **d*r 1, exes isw; and ;:3. Grur$t i*te.nr*n*r *ny eltt'r*r reii*f t* *;*i* i r [* esi!tit***^ l *&sF€F*e ] i i.

l

Fsge$*f{

,

i

ir

this faxwas sent wih GFlFadvtakerfa( servq For more infr n. vsit I ro8 /20 1 lJob Number 6:653I @ ooo4 {;":; 5t1U Uate:w1lzu142:59:56FM IIUIII. Li,W UI'ITAs OI OIIUETIIJ tsArcOIP IO. INE LAVV UtsFILtr Uts FLUK tr ftiE*S,S,rt- i-"P **vi<i i,

*l-

'4ft':rY':e $tatc* *1S5S*4*$ :s*s hi*r vs$*r $deAiie* T*tepi't s{i} *3x-ffi1tr1 fs*sir*i i ssj-14s# *-rnail

i*e.w F{ir.ht_ ptts

THtr

tiEgF9 { S*-**u l*terr,s*n<rr $tete ffi$${}s?*fi 8** g. tutcAlle* ?s,$r}'!

l #s$*s1lss s$ffi*s'i#1

Rene t".s*R tl*r-**i-r F:1t#!"Vs$"$#f Stst* TSl#i 4*d5'\i. v&fttJs , Tex$s f&$ffiff ffi.i* Gr* Ts

: '{sty-swsit F***irnii i 4ffir**$ss H"r,':rg{i: ru$ogeru$wSgr*a

**g*+ € *i This fa( was s6nt wih GFI Fa)dylaker fax ssryor. For more visit .com L/24 4 3: 06PM lJob Number 6:6531 @OOoS i t0[[ LaYyviltcSs 0t t't|(Jelto Fatcono t0. Intr LAyy uFFtuE. uF FLUH E SfrRT$Ff*ATg *F tr c*r'tl{y that *n ,s"ilg*et r , ?s1d s #*frsF Sspy Sf tf'r*, *bove

I

,*{q INJ iNTSRVTNT{*N f.*R *gT€RftdI *F rtrh.ttrfrfTAf{cs F fti#$i{ri rued $ cle*f{ F*r$** iistsd belcw by the Florer*i y f*r Spmphanie Rio*

7 Islarq$lSit., $te. ff ; rnde fltit"y, l'X ZS5S*

FI

'!' .t' $fi) ffss*rIss

rss):ffis-17$S

F

Feg* S *f This Fil Ms ssnt witn GFI Fadvlaker fa sereL For mors vsit l/20L lJob Number 6t6E3l Eiloooe PAge: Il'tu t,0r{. Llr}Y vilces 0r rril0efl(r farcoro IO- INE LAYY UFI-ILT UF I'LUI( T uate: a1l2u'14 2.59:bg vM !;. ': - ds$t*ffiflS ri

j

-- uii**i$",-"lrr**"*^:- *'Sltlfi#* i'd li! li ifl rw *siYf&Fs #F .*. $f ,iir,iii ij ? f{ila; *susH N*. "i-sff. {.li

*Y

&Rrffim$$# Fr iF &

luu*_ e &$?"ru **{"* fs3}" " Tffi p.s.$ Ts*se6ffi#l JI.J!}{3H #F S,AiE} ${}eJ N*BS lfr {FfffitrS ffiA$qft& ffiAffiruAL#&idq Fr ff;#, *s ##,x'$ 1i{if*ssrq$ tl$,&R€Y R${3$, S i t* the a,rygr{[c*ti*n fc]f isst*€]n*e cf , *g::p,*inwnt herti*, e;i$ fiies tl"ri* *pF i i *f *,#ffiini*tre*ipn f*r the sstets *f A,ffi s rl, ' , ffir{S#;, c$ere$*'*i:i, fi*#rJ in this Scr"*rt tu$#,}- frt$,i p"*14, by s"fl'ffiFF{A\FSgS R$ffiS, ilt":sti$r'). ;*n*€ fymri*hm.* th*. f*{f+wing iori t* thr* **urt: {}pp*nent [* e pers*n int*reeted i tirie i:**ei $**4us* shs* iw th* s'notfrer ; , e{'!d ttpturwi gu;*r$i*n t?f A&GY Ri#S, '+ri^ro is e *e i:ter *nqi f**ir of [}erx*c{etlt. 'i,i , ...i l ..1 : I ;t. l

{,.}$}p*ffi*ftt mdmits th* el{*geti*r: ii*r. e*6ili**ti** fcir iom*mn*& *f {*$eru *,f *gl*, and dar*i[uii*; {b} thc* feet, e*owi*g j*rim+i{**Si*r'} e*d '*w.nus; n** r"tqr +urr":*d hy c{ee.wwm*S of t$re ti.me *f l

, S$wth. t]$:L*4r-l**t adr*pta t$l#s* *il*gs*i*ew *r:c k*s; th*rr': 6rewiiexf t&'elw mpg**xiti*n. ,ir ';il -.l, :l- i' ' .],

:l-

I $lr:**g":f fq:* €he rrle'ft*r* *Sr',"ri9.c*S i $*-:**$:t fq:r $re ffie'lt*r* *Sr,,"ri9.c** ,' .' ip**tiei"e ? ebhl"er*, *pgl*nef* #*nie* i .r.i.:.i ..-':i

I

'iSSRsfS,lv *il ]*'lii*i. aiiwg*ti*i:s ix;*teirred !* tf:s Fi:ii**tl*c] f*r li*,rgtt**r"lr.:{s r*f i*ttgys gf rndr*lnisrtr*t6arsn allqJ. **$$encj* *{t^!*t pr**ir pf t!:+ u i*,.* **l*gettr:.s:b **r e $!r*$srl{*sfsn$e ii Sr"*r*ii"llq *uir****:*. I*f lt*c ll

'll "i I '":',, i F*g*tr;fe

r

This fd was sent wift GFI Faldvlaker fa serer For moro visit lttF:/,lvlwv.gf i.com L/20L4 3:0gPM i 08 lJob Nunber 6653I E oo0z From. Ldll, Otllces 0r Gtlbsno Falcono l0: IHL LAWoF|-lch 0t- |-LOH E I Date: 8/1{2014 2:59:59 Plvl PaqP:E/10 4. j/'dgrpii*e*t SFfftr-rtAN$ffi R$GS i$ e*jitie* t* *9 sdretnt*irmti*x $treu'* eir,$ l* disq;-ra{i$}ed ts} servs es :r=* i*r thst s*e he* s

I

,*f ilitqerc*t uvi*r A,$$y ffi$#$. $T# mrr xppli*-eti** f*r

I

in*{:i*ir *r" h*ireftip ssr* dtr*s **t i#**S *3'lit* fiftd heir of srli in i*qj$*ti**. S"F#Fgd&*$*# ffi$*$ rh* 3$'l*i *ietrici *f St*l'r **e.*r"rg, *iyiet* *e**e hi,:. ili*-i3 ?1 .*$wi*g rls txltl:e wr*ngfu! {ssrit. in that prs*eecii*S $fts rS*f"r i,* irs CIs tfr* per**nat *1'the iletgf.e, w|:en in fs*t ahe ie *{ **rr.t frissrd rsf &MY R*SS, ieci**$ f':at tfr*i: n**rt fr*ir n**rt the npp*icdrti*n f*r the npp*icdrti*n f*r $u*V $u*V e,f incJlm;nlmtr*t**n. the€ lettere *f *rirni eti*rJ n*t be tr* SYHFF{.&S{Iff l*,*i*e*$ furthfir *r#n*rw thet ff'rw ***rt *esms *nd ffle*t ths #'*t"r$ #f8r1t *Lj*h &tfu€r # i{y srlihs+it*pd: I M*of* {}LiiF.t;{ FEF,9eft ,l A-. 1,. F;} *svi* J. rd*.: t)*$S.fS{?S Stste FS s*s 1$i* .S,t+e.ui,t i Mrr4"ilx* m:seS ?-SS{i'{

; r*sr:i m*r-dtpt Fe*sii"n!! ] #.31,.r4S$ il**':*ii:

F*ge H *f This fax w€s sent vrifi GFI Fa)d\4akertax servor For :/ Mr'/rv.gfi.com ;,{, I/ lJob Nurnber 66531 Eil000s 3: lOPM From: L3w Unc€s ol gtlberto Falcono lo: IHE LAWOFFICE OF l-Loll E i*uv Ft fu!, FLL* I +-Sts- itg* *pp*rr"i* ,{ss*s?

$tmt* 8;* H.

T*SSr ) $$e-e #* Telep F ] s6*"s1

n H-ryieii "/ {*-- "tt Serxs-* ,Q,ene fipp*r'l*rr $iste 4S4 N, vefi$s fti* Sra , T*y*s rsssr Tsleph ) 4S7

iJ .4fi;/ F$**1ft1 F-rn*ii; grweit,ccrn

Fcg* & *f This ta($,as sent wift GFI Fadvlakgr fa( s6rver. For more .com L/20L4 3: 11PM lJob Number 665JI BOOOS |U1O Dare:8/1/20142:5S:5SpM Lav{Offices ofcihelto Falcono To: THELAWoFFICE OF FLoRE *HffiY*r*ff&T* *f, *eirr**ti***v clf *pp**itia* t* i t.-_ El*rs$n irstss b*fCIw by t*e "t

l f /4

l

|*t*rw$ F y fur $tephanie Kios A ?

Fl*rtl$ {3t., St*. H rnde: $ity, TX 7ffsffi?

H Y

ss) ss$-1 ?ss i$$) kP3-r7s0

I

Pag* S *f This fa( sias sent wift GFI Fadvlaker fa( son/er. For more .com 4 3:12PM lJob Nunber 6i6sgl @ooto llomi Law umces 0I biloeflo Fatcono IO: IIlE LAWUFFIUE OF FLURts Date: al1(2U14 2:59:5a PM l l

I

iiS.t jil{i*

+ ,--,'.1.-* "*, .. j '+.).Fii l" j'4rt" ll;!3* "qss i:ffis.i r{i* ii-iei Jaritiq' i::Jsi:r't i -,--:.-*.--L-..---.,-tr'i...,i--......

-:, l:il,jji- -t - - :,{ fr'("ary ft*vli*k\r $sfg!m*$ r.v"lt& glx*fio''** Lr3r ';.;i Air**iiqd $liqalris firr.d e ftg-si*iilp*ci c.opy I ir lr', i)f-.*i'r'etllti*n fc..r' l,)er&,rmirrgl{on t cX l,r$*riimrlr::e And *ppc*iliir:i't i* Appii**{,tif.r i{ir j l fd','t?iir-r1;ln/1d:! fF;,:-;+r&r fu:r' scl, i| i*,/:rarr're ()iqr.; 'i,"r ,..- r!,?trtirilrlLil;1{in}tl$l , l(Jl yq,Jrjr Jt}+i.JII"rF, ! riUU$; y,r;ii.!-:&' luir,ei clf tr6x*st"fi$. pi$e$s ei.* r.r*t

,l t# c,)tXdti:l n"lv Olli$+.

This fax was sent wifi GFI Fatyiaker fa setrer For more vsit h //' wv.gfi.com 3:02PM lJob Number 66531 Eooor

Gmail - Rios Flor Flores <ffloreslaw@gmail.com>

R

1r

Wed, Apr 1,2015 at 1:56 PM issue of a common law marriage. At the last Order and set altrial date. I spoke with Chico . I am getting ready to prepare the Order and

the trial may itake at lerast two days since. I N. $lores lSt., gte, .[i https//mqil.go4le.$om/nrail/u/0/?r.li=lgik:=6'i'00a43108&view=pt&q=in%3Asent%20gi .com &qs= true&search= query&th = I 4c765T e50... ^[1] | I 8130t2015 Gmait - Artemio {i{s rstate fl"$*l li $ L*Flffi,.- Ii

FrorFtores<ffroresraw@gmair.com>

' i,,t i'.trojiju: i l;

ArtbmioiRios Eistat,e I ] 1 mQssag;e

]

Flor iFloresi .<fflrcresilavv@gnraril.comt i ] To: "gitbertcjqgsiinenorarodnra,w.com" <girberro@girbertofarconru*ljorr, ,,amber@gi'Hili#.flnt11.::Lq ut 12:0e PM < anrf er@)gif bertol alconl aw, com> Cc: Nadia LA1 .:floreslawassist0l@gmail.comr

i l Gilbr-'rto, Amber: I li Oril\pril 1st, I sent both of vou an email requesting tentative tri[{ dates so we could finalize the Docket Control ordelrtlrerJudger instrtrctr:cl t.ts to submit in this malter. lt is novr{'l'rry ,3th and I have not received a response from you' I ant tequersting one last time trial dates in June tromldou'so r can get this case scheduled, lf I don,t reoeive a resp'onse, I willl r;urbmit a Docket control order wtho+i]your input. riirinX I have waited tong enough. Adpitionally, Yojrr discovery responses are overdue. Please arr{vf tnis electronic correspondence to serve as a forlnal request for res;ponses by no later than the end of the nu{iiress oay on rvonday, tVtay 18, 2015. lf I do not reoeive sqid responses, I will be filing a Motiorr for Contempt arif for Sanctions ll Thiink yotr for your prompt ;rttention to these matters.

i

Fk>:r Ii. F'lor:cs 'l'ex'as,l'4fer Lowyers - I\i.ring,\'tar.r 20/ j,ctncl.20/ 5 The Law fiir.rn of Filor E. Flores, PLLC 700 N. Florei; St,, Str::. Ii Rio Grande Cin','Iexas 7B5BZ 'l'ol: (956):Zti13-1'f86 trax: (956),lfii3-1750 $,W$'. [1]oreslaur.conl [l l o re s ] :ru,@)gmar L c;o n"t

httos://mail.ooo0le-com/nrall/u/o/?rLi=!1i ift:::2/fy62431og&vie_w= nt&o= ino/nl tnf.aleonf aw nnm.tnq=trr pRcparnh=nr prrr,tlh= ^[1] AdAcAOaah 1 t,1 NrJr-c c' *o,cLooK__ d_ M ij ti AU6 2 0 2015

P{L- \.1- lr i CI.EfiK STASR CO. TX I ll

AT LAW STARR COLINTY, TI]XAS

ti "J day of Iitlt zulMIiMlSERED that on ,2015, a docket codtrol cr:nfen:flcer was held. l ,l

Jury T'rifl requested: Yes

A.

Deadlinp to request for jury:

B.

qloO >-rn. l'his case is sr:t for'Irial

C.

r\ .Pre-Trial conference is set for D. . (Pre-Trial Notbbook is mandatory) l"he dr:a$line for filing all dispositive summary and pretrial motions by E.

I)efendzint (s) is _ The court will schedule a h.earing po it,iiO rnotio* up* th" ftlirrg of ru*". l'he dr:rabline for filing all dispositive summary r and pretrial motions by [:'laintiff(r;) is _

The court will schedule a hiearing prL said motions upon the fiiing. tq' VfrT/ 'Jlhe dr:rapline for designation of expert witnesses G. Defendant (s)

TECP

H. llhe deadliLne for designation of expert witnesses Plaintiff (s) is: TlIC P llhe dea$line for completion of discovery for l. (s) is: cp m llhe drlahline for completion of discovery for P ru (s) ls: J. t' TNC P l t, llhe d,radline for amendment of allpleadings for I\. jDefendant (s) is: , TnCf

I

L. llhe deadline for amendment of all pleadings for Plaintiff (s) is: l.'he d,:adline to submit to mediation is Manda tvl. 0 F (S) ATTORNEY/ F/o, €- Fl,'" s: 't K0 /1/ F/on, 8/.

I

'?56 /a

r,

(rst 2b 3 - /75,

27-

s) ATTORMY 4,rr*' 6s,zp ,41S,nn Al L,L,,t-

eoo V an4 s- eeo V ?p1 Sr- ?ro 1'an/, 4'an/e Cb,ru.

T4: (?sa) "":t:f: fr*, GsA) Aez- s|o{

kimail - ehile I exas.oov - hr Accepted - 4663%3 # qlr {-*nW,,it $

Flor Flores <fflores!aw@gmail.com> r:,;!1tri[{ii ".-**-!****** .i*-----------*-- tl eFifeTexas.gtov ...' Iriling Accepted - 4663943 1 me$sage r ***-j+-***"i-*"**** ttto-fignlV@pfi leterxas. g;civ < No-Reprly@efiletexas. gov>

Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1:53 PM To: f{f ores lairy@{lrnaril. c om l J.tEl'lll_[

Filing

Accepted [*F' IEi{ril$.gr]rr Envelope Number: 4663943 il l

I

l ThS filin$ belh:w v,rgs reviewed and has been accel by the clerk$ office. Be sure to click thdLlin[< pelc,ur to retneve your file stamped copy of document filed. nt&d= pR-1r'-16Rcq=rrr pp-c

https://mailllioogle.cdm/mailrrr"t/O/?ui::2&ik=ir700a43108&view= n arr t 9-th- ^[1] A raAEl ^/^onELA^o ^t ^r- a t ^a^E r -

I

j

I

l

CAUSE NO. PR.

ltu

i,

I]\ THE IIISTITTII OF I t* THE COUNTY CO

I

$ l $ A,RfEn/nIO RIO{i I I AT LAW OF $ s

nnbnasin:u i i STARR COUNTY, TE $ l

I

,F WRITTEN DISCOVT]R

I t:fltvfn$ N,OW, STIEPHANIE RIOS, Appti in the above entitled and numbered cauEe, arnd pursuant to the lfexas Rule of Civil procedu Rule 191.4, files this First Certificate of Srritten f,riscovely and certifies that on this 26th day , March 2015, Applicant forwarded the n rr I tollciwrng to opposiing counsel.

l

I.

.Afotrtlicnnt's Rule 194 Requestfor to Intervenor; and 2:.. .Aptrtlticunt's First Set oJ'Interrog for Adtnissions, and Requests ,fQr Production to Intervenor. Respectful submitted, Ttre Law RM oF FIon B. FIonns. PLLC 700 N. Flo

St., Ste, E Rio Gr ity, Texas 18582 Tel: (956) 3-r786 Fax: (956) 3-r750 Email: tt]

( Flor No.24065235 State Attot for Applicant Stephanie Rios

Cause No. PR-1II-16; In the ll,state of Artenio Rios. Deceased Aprurcawr's lirnsl. rlEn.nrrcATE oF WRrfinN Drscoveny

1t ii ii lj tl ii

VI

I, Irlor Flores, hereby certiSr that on this the tn day pf March,, 2015, a true and correct of 's First CetiJicate of Written Disco werp served unto all parties of record, th the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure: ONI ILBERTO FALCOI'I. Maria Adriana Fl.ores

E. Flores -14-16; Ilt the Estate of Artemio Rios, Deceasetl Page2 of2 Irrnsr CrinrmrcerE or WRrrrEN DrscovERy Gmail - eFileTexas.oov -Fili - ^[6306743] lAccepted

I

Flor Flores <ffloreslaw@gmail.com> I I I I i-*'- I I

Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 2:42 PM HFlll"[ Filing Accepted TEHlffi,grlrr' Envelope Number: 6306743

berlow wQs reviewc.d and has been accel by the clerks office. Be sure to click llour to retrieve your file stamped copy of

document filed. Flor Flores <ffloreslaw@grnail.com> Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 2:44 pM filllllJ

Filing

Accepted qTn}fr,*$.ffw THHfi$. Envelope Number: 690731S g filini beforrv wds rerviewed and has been accept by the clerks office. Be sure to click ri link pelory to relrieve your file stamped copy of tl document filed. hffnq'//maillnmfonhm/mailf /..lli- dgjt.-^1 n^reinog'i^..,_^rea_Fr 4t 4^o_^_L-,,^o--_-- Gmail - eFileTexas.gov - Accepted - 6307396 Flor Flores <ffloreslaw@gmail.com> r';{ rn x rl{L **,*]-1-.*_ eFilbTe 1 mgssage

s.99v .: Nlo-Reply@efiletexas. gov> Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 2:52 pM Lcofn Filing

Accepted

Envelope Number: 6307396 ow!/qs rr;'viewed and has been accep by the clerks office, Be sure to click v to rqtrierve your file stamped copy oi. document filed. m/rnail/]r-r,t0l?ui,=2&i k= a700a431 Og&view= ot&o= nr-,t4_ ^[1] 68.os=rrr rarv 2lh= ^[4] A aaEo Aefrriffe^? g ^ ; ^[*] r _. ^ ^ ^ E ^ ^ E^^ r^ _ - Gmail - eFileTexas.gov - - ^[6307474] Flor Flores <ffloreslaw@gmai l.com> lit .-IFif iing Accepted - 6307474 eFil 1me

Fri, ,Jul 31, 2015 at 2:50 PM Filing

Accepted

ll$,-$*tt" Envelope Number: 6307474 w wqs reviewed and has been accel

by the clerkS office. Be sure to click to retrieve your file stamped copy of document fildd. I lll, l l*^- 'rt- ^ii ,^^^^, ^ ^i* ,* it t,,t^t^, .l-4oit.--?,ta- ,^r n a 6. .: ^ ^ Flled: 2/1 /2O15 '| :01:01 PM Eloy R. Garcia, District Clerk Stan County, Texas Brendaly Guerrero

Filed: 8/31/2015 10:45:48 AM CAUSE NO. DC-13-971 Dennis D. Gonzalez County Clerk $ HUGO ALANIA JR., STEPHANTE RrOS rN THE DTSTRTCT COURT Starr County, Texas And ARTEMIO RIOS, JR,Individually and $ On Behalf of the Estate of ARTEMIO RIOS, S

Lilly Guerrero Plaintffi,

S

s

And

$

s

JOANN GONZALEZ, and RAMES GONZALEZ, S S $

AND $ 381't JUDICIAL DISTRTCT $ MARHMAGDALENAFLORES,ASNEXT $ FRIEND OX'AMY DEL CARMEN RrOS, A

$

MINOR CHILD

S

Intervenor-Plaintilfs $ $ Y.$ $ ANDERSON COLIMBIA COMPAIYY,INC" $ $ $

srARR COITNTY, TEXAS Defendant

AGREED AMENDED DOCKET CONTROL ORDER

Feb. BE IT REMEMBERED THAT' ON 2nd DAY OF Jamuy, 2015, counsels for Plaintiffs, Interuenors, and Defendan! appeared and agleed, and the Court entered the following order:

1. Jury selection-Trial: Octoberl9' 2015 at 9:00 a.m. 2. Desiguation of ExPerts:

a) Plaintiffs/lntervenors: May 8,2015 b) Defendant:

June 15,2015 3. Discovery Deadlines: a) Plaintiffs/Intervenors: September 18' 2015 b) Defendant: September 18,2015

Seot. 4. DaubertlRobinson Hearings (if needed), ffist -\2015 at 9:00 a.m. a) Amerndment of Pleadings (Plaintiff): May 1l 10, 2015 tr) Amendment of Pleadings (Defendant): July 6,2015 Itinal Pre-Trial conference Pursuant to T.RC.P. # 166z october 7 , 20ls art 9:00 e'.m. l\ll Motirrns in limine shall be filed and heard at final pretrial. llrial Nolebooks are due two (2) weeks before Final Pre-Trial Conference. llrial Notebooks shall be incompliance with T.R.C.P. 166, including special issues.

SIGITED AND ORDERED ON THIS 2 d^y o1 Feb. 2015. Luis Garza Keith W.lapeze State Bar No. 24010176 Taylor Shiprnan State Bar No. 24079323 Christopher,K. Johnsr State Bar No. 240021353 LAPEZTI & IOHNS, P.L.L.C. 601 Sawyer Street, Suite 650 Houston' TX:"77007 Phone: ('713) 739-1010 Fax: (713) 7'39-l0li' tay lor@ lqp4qhrm. cronn keith@lapezej ohns. com christopher@lapezej,ohns. com C ouns e I .for P I ai nt iff' / Interv enor

01/30/2015 EF1'l Ft{H S582631?50 Law Firm of E 0002/0002 rt) Amendment of Fleadings (Plainriff): M il 10,20t5 b) Arnendment of Pleadiugt (Defendant): Ju

6,2015 l'inal Pre-l'rial Conference Pursuant to 1'.R,C.P # 166: October _r

201s

at 9;00 s.m. All Motions in liminp shall be filed and heard at

pretrial. Trial Notebooks are due rwo (Z) weeks before Final Trisl Cqnference,

I

TrialNotebooks shall be incompliance with T,R.C, I 66, incljuding special tssues, SIGNED AND ORI}ERED ON THI$ 20r5. Jose Luis Garza 38lst Dlstrlct Ju W;Lapeze

Kei N0.24010176 Staie

No. 24065235 Sfipman W FIRM OF fLOR E. FLORES, THE No. 240?9323 700 N. lores $treet, Suite E K. Johns Rio Ciry,,Texas 78582 i No, 24002353 Sti Phone: (956) 263- I 786 LI & JOIINS, P,L-I,.C.

Fax: ( ) 253- 1;7s0 60 i,er Street, Suire 650 fllsr I TX 77007 Jbr PlaintilJs (713) 73e..r010 ls) 739-10r5

F

LO_rn kei sJ0npurg..9a t! ohns.oom lM Plaintiff / Intervenor

C

L. Ramirez BarNo.16506200 RAMIREZ LAW FIRM, PLLC

Hackberry Ave. TX 78501 : (956) 668-8t00 (956) 668-8101

for Intervenor tr\

No.21648500

Braich

N0.24033198

P. Geer No.00786389 Williams No.24070854 State 1044 N. Central Exprcssway, Suite 520 Dalla Texas 7523 I

Qt4)736-9433 t4)736-9994 for Defendant

Case Details

Case Name: in Re Stephanie Rios

Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas

Date Published: Sep 4, 2015

Docket Number: 04-15-00557-CV

Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.