History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Stattmann
335 U.S. 805
SCOTUS
1948
Check Treatment

Treating the application in each of these cases as a motion for leave to file a petition for an original writ of habeas corpus, leave to file is denied.

The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Reed, Mr. Justice Frankfurter, and Mr. Justice Burton are of the opinion that there is want of jurisdiction. U. S. Constitution, Article III, § 2, Clause 2; see Ex parte Betz and companion cases, all 329 U. S. 672 (1946); Milch v. United States, 332 U. S. 789 (1947); Brandt v. United States, 333 U. S. 836 (1948); In re Eichel, 333 U. S. 865 (1948). Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Murphy, and Mr. Justice Rutledge are of the opinion that motions for leave to file should be granted *806and that the cases should be set for argument forthwith. MR. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Stattmann
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Oct 11, 1948
Citation: 335 U.S. 805
Docket Number: No. 28; No. 39; No. 93; No. 103
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.