History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Siegfried
265 A.D. 964
N.Y. App. Div.
1942
Check Treatment

(Vide Matter of Davis, 252 App. Div.. 591; Matter of Salus, 321 Penn. St. 106.) No other wrongdoing has been charged against the respondent. The court cannot agree with the recommendation of the learned official referee that discipline be limited to censure but decides that the offense requires a suspension from the practice of the law for a period of six months. Respondent is suspended from the practice of the law for a period of six months. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Siegfried
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 30, 1942
Citation: 265 A.D. 964
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.