History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re Shoup
154 Ohio St. 221
Ohio
1950
Check Treatment

The petitioner, counsel for a public transportation system, a defendant in a pending negligence *Page 222 action, seeks by a proceeding in habeas corpus in this court to be released from technical custody under a commitment by a notary public for failure to comply with a subpoena duces tecum in refusing to produce certain records for use in the taking of a deposition before such notary.

The records which the plaintiff in the negligence case seeks to have produced consist of slips of paper containing the names of witnesses procured by an employee of the transportation system after the accident which resulted in the negligence action. These records had been turned over to the system's legal department, according to the custom of the system.

Such records are privileged and their production cannot be enforced by subpoena duces tecum. Ex parte Schoepf, 74 Ohio St. 1, paragraph three of the syllabus, 77 N.E. 276; In re Hyde,149 Ohio St. 407, 79 N.E.2d 224; In re Keough, 151 Ohio St. 307, 85 N.E.2d 550.

Accordingly, the custody of the petitioner is unlawful, and he is, hereby, discharged therefrom.

Petitioner discharged.

WEYGANDT, C.J., MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, TAFT and FAUGHT, JJ., concur. *Page 223

Case Details

Case Name: In Re Shoup
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 25, 1950
Citation: 154 Ohio St. 221
Docket Number: 31743
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.