In re Shanell K.M.
The court‘s finding on permanent neglect was correct within the meaning of
The preponderance of the evidence also established that despite such diligent efforts, appellant failed, during the relevant statutory period, to sufficiently maintain contact with and plan for the return of the child (see
Concur—Andrias, J.P., Nardelli, Catterson, Acosta and DeGrasse, JJ.