History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re: Sean Mescall
706 F. App'x 135
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sean F. Mescall, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sean Mescall petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed ordering the United States to respond to his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We conclude that the present record does not disclose undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before us and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

2

Case Details

Case Name: In re: Sean Mescall
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Dec 18, 2017
Citation: 706 F. App'x 135
Docket Number: 17-2285
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.