IN RE Jeffrey M. SILOW
No. 17-BG-1082
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
(FILED—December 21, 2017)
88
BEFORE: Glickman and McLeese, Associate Judges, and Steadman, Senior Judge.
An Administratively Suspended Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Bar Reg. No. 211847
PER CURIAM
On consideration of the certified order disbarring respondent from practice law by consent in the state of Pennsylvania; this court‘s October 10, 2017, order temporarily suspending respondent in this case and directing him to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed; and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline; and it appearing that respondent did not file a response to the show cause order or the required
ORDERED that Jeffrey M. Silow is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483, 487-88 (D.C. 2010) (explaining that the presumption of identical discipline in
FURTHER ORDERED that for the purposes of reinstatement the time for reinstatement will not begin to run until such time as respondent files a
IN RE Laurence F. JOHNSON
No. 17-BG-1083
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
(FILED—December 21, 2017)
BEFORE: Glickman and McLeese, Associate Judges, and Steadman, Senior Judge.
A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Bar Reg. No. 934398
PER CURIAM
On consideration of the certified order of the Maryland Court of Appeals indefinitely suspending respondent from the practice of law in the state of Maryland by consent with a right to seek reinstatement after ninety days; this court‘s October 10, 2017, order temporarily suspending respondent and directing him to show cause why functionally equivalent reciprocal discipline should not be imposed; and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline; and it appearing that respondent did not file a response to this court‘s show cause order but did timely file the required
ORDERED that Laurence F. Johnson is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for ninety days,
IN RE Sean Gardner SAXON
No. 17-BG-426
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
(FILED—December 21, 2017)
BEFORE: Glickman and McLeese, Associate Judges, and Steadman, Senior Judge.
An Administratively Suspended Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Bar Reg. No. 481348, 2017 DDN 35
PER CURIAM
On consideration of the certified order suspending respondent from the practice of law in the state of Colorado for three years with a fitness requirement; this court‘s October 10, 2017, order temporarily suspending respondent in this case and directing him to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed; the statement of Disciplinary Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline; and it appearing that respondent did not file a response to this court‘s show cause order or the required
ORDERED that Sean Gardner Saxon is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for three years with reinstatement subject to a fitness requirement. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483, 487-88 (D.C. 2010) (explaining that the presumption of identical discipline in
IN RE Leslie D. SILVERMAN, Respondent.
No. 17-BG-512
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
(FILED—December 21, 2017)
BEFORE: Blackburne-Rigsby, Chief Judge, Beckwith, Associate Judge, and Nebeker, Senior Judge.
Bar Registration No. 448188, Board Docket No. 11-BD-090, BDN: 17-11