In re Sarah A.
In two related child neglect proceedings pursuant to
Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order of fact-finding and disposition as placed the father under the supervision of the Administration for Children‘s Services for a period of one year is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements, as the period of supervision has expired; and it is further,
Ordered that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the father‘s contentions, the Family Court properly found that he neglected the subject children by selling controlled substances from the home and possessing multiple quantities of prescription drugs, cocaine, and marijuana, that were readily accessible to the children (see