In Re Rush Hampton Industries, Inc.
ORDER
This matter came before the Court on various Motions and Amended Motions filed by Omega Consulting, Inc. (“Omega”), as the Assignee of Rush Hampton Industries, the Debtor herein (“Debtor”), seeking turnover of unclaimed funds totaling $36,624.54. The Motions and Amended Motions include Doc. Nos. 618, 620, 623, 624, 626, 627, and 631 (collectively, the “Motions”). Various Orders were entered denying the Motions based upon incorrect claim amounts, incorrect claim totals, and procedural deficiencies. The Orders include Doc. Nos. 619, 621, 622, 628, 629, and 630. An Order for Payment of Unclaimed Funds was entered on November 17, 2006 (Doc. No. 632) (“November 17, 2006 Order”) granting Omega’s request for unclaimed funds of $36,624.54 and directing the Clerk of Court to pay such sum to Omega. The funds have not been released from the registry of the Court and the November 17, 2006 Order is being reconsidered.
The Debtor filed the above-captioned bankruptcy case on December 31, 1984. The case was converted from Chapter 11 to Chapter 7 on February 6,1986. Andrea Ruff was appointed the Chapter 7 Trustee (“Trustee”). She, in accordance with her statutory duties of
Omega began filing its Motions in July 2006 contending it, as the Assignee of the Debtor, is entitled to the unclaimed funds of $36,624.54 held in the Court’s registry. The Motions were signed and filed by Eric Dangerfield as President of Omega with an address of 7706 Pinebrook Drive, San Antonio, Texas 78230. 2 The amount of $36,624.54 sought by Omega is comprised of unclaimed, funds relating to distributions made by the Trustee to approximately 244 claimholders.
The funds paid into the registry of the Court result from unclaimed distribution checks and not a distribution surplus. The funds constitute property of the estate to be disposed of in accordance with Chapter 129 of title 28.
A creditor to whom a distribution in a bankruptcy case is payable retains a property interest in such funds ... Under statutory requirements and due process principles, the Court has the duty to protect the original claimant’s property interest by making sure that unclaimed funds are disbursed to their true owner ... The ‘rightful owner’ of unclaimed funds paid into the Court under§ 347(a) is the holder of the proof ofclaim on account of which the trustee made the distribution.
In re App. Unclaimed Funds in Exhibit “A”,
Neither the Debtor, nor any assignee of the Debtor, is entitled to the unclaimed funds held in the registry of the Court relating to this case. The rightful owners of those funds are the holders of the proofs of claim on account of which the Trustee made the distribution. Omega’s Motions are due to be denied.
Omega represented it had authority to seek recovery of the unclaimed funds when it did not have such authority. The November 17, 2006 Order was entered in error. The Court has authority to remedy such error pursuant to
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the Order for Payment of Unclaimed Funds entered on November 17, 2006 (Doc. No. 632) is hereby VACATED; and it is further
ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that all of Omega’s Motions seeking recovery of the funds held in the registry of the Court relating to this case, including Doc. Nos. 618, 620, 623, 624, 626, 627, 631, are hereby DENIED.
Notes
. The letter was docketed as Doc. No. 641.
. The general rule in the Eleventh Circuit is that a corporation or other entity may not appear in a federal court other than through a licensed attorney at law.
Palazzo v. Gulf Oil Corp.,
.“Ninety days after the final distribution under