History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Rodriguez
30 N.Y.2d 768
NY
1972
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

Order reversed and the matter remitted to the Family Court for a new hearing. The respondent [appellant] was entitled to the representation of a lawyer upon th,e hearing (see Family Ct. Act, § 249; Matter of Lawrence S., 29 N Y 2d 206). Petitioner’s [respondent’s] attorney has commendably suggested that, reversal and a new hearing is indicated.






Concurrence Opinion

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Rodriguez
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 4, 1972
Citation: 30 N.Y.2d 768
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.