122 F. 732 | D. Mass. | 1903
This was an involuntary petition against the proprietor and manager of the Copley Square Hotel, situated in Boston, arid containing 180 rooms, where the respondent had his usual place of abode. On March 2, 1903, at the time the officer went to the hotel, the respondent was lying ill and unconscious in Newton, where he had been for several days. The officer handed the subpoena and copy of the petition to the clerk of the hotel, who informed the officer that the respondent was not there, but was at Newton, and that he would give the papers to him. The respondent never received the papers, and had no knowledge of the service, but died unconscious early on the morning of March 4th. His executrix now pleads in abatement that the service was insufficient.
Section 18a of the bankrupt act, Act July 1, 1898, 30 Stat. 551, c. 541 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3429], as amended by the Ray Bill, Act Feb. 5, 1903, § 6, 32 Stat. 798, c. 487, provides, in substance, that service of the petition “with a writ of subpoena shall be made upon the person therein named as defendant, in the same manner in which service of such process is now had upon the commencement of a suit m equity in the courts of the United States”; “but, in case personal service cannot be made, then notice shall be given by
If the Supreme Court had not thus interpreted the section of the bankrupt act in question, there might be reason to hold that the qualifying phrase, “but in case personal service cannot be made,” was intended to require publication, where service upon the respondent in person could not be had. It seems that “personal service” ordinarily means service upon the defendant personally, and ordinarily does not include service by leaving a notice at his last and usual place of abode. See the act of 1875, above referred to. See, also, Rev. Laws Mass. c. 167, § 31; Id. c. 177, § 52; Id. c. 78, § 12; Id. c. 178, § 44. It is also true that form 4, promulgated by the Supreme Court, is substantially identical with form 57, 18 Sup. Ct. xlv, in use under the act of 1867 (Avery & Hobbs on Bankruptcy, p. 436),
Convenience favors the construction of the statute thus adopted. While it is quite possible that a service at his last and usual place of abode may remain unknown to the respondent, yet this service is more likely to come to his knowledge than a service made by publication in a newspaper. The fact that the respondent was and remained unconscious doe's not appear to me material, especially in view of the provision that neither the death nor the insanity of the bankrupt shall abate the proceedings. See section 8a.
No objection was made to the form of the officer’s return, or to its failure to state that the copy had been left with “some adult person who is a member or resident in the family.” In this district it has not been customary to insert these words in the return, either in bankruptcy or in equity. Our practice differs from that announced in Blythe v. Hinckley (C. C.) 84 Fed. 228, 239. That the hotel clerk is an adult member or resident in the family of the hotel proprietor appears plain.