Case Information
*1
Ricef Dean Fankle 4542598 Jestie 3 Unit 3 Jestie Rons Reinmond, Texas 77406
Fusefenth level of morals with: Cueatshose d. Pecie, Green 301 Fannin, Jute 245 Hawston, Texas 77002
H. 15.00716 OK
Re: Filing of criminal application for.
Dear Hancorick Pecie, Green: Cudsed, Abuse Find moran for loure to File criminal application for wort of maronamels, application to related foemal maurits, and describe's criminal application for wort of maronamle, to be filled with the level. Abuse consult fius instement for Gwee's delins as the business peems for. Do to Retire's inderent stabs, He was not able to pass a buey of the same as us. mail people fous addressed to the Rechandent of this metion, and returte request fommented of the buee wort edend.
I thank you in aolame for the attention and amodification in this ceed matter.
Reductoilly Sizmitted,
*2 RELEV DEAN FALGER TOCJ - 542398 RELATOR .
JEARS DE ANEHMENT OF CERMINAL JUSTES-DIUGGAN OF BORKE OF PARONIS AND PAROLES RESPONDENT
IN THE FULGED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS AUG 212065 CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE CLERK
MOTION FOR LEANE TO FIE DECLINAL ADVICATION FOR AUDI OF MANUAMINUS to the HONORANOIE JUDGE OF SAID FALGER
Dames Nww, RIEV DEAN FALGER, RELATOR PRISSE, IN THE HOWE STREED, REQUISED LAVE TO FIE DICINAL ADVICATION FOR AUDI OF MANUAMINUS, WOULD SIVOU THE EAGLEt AS FOLIOUS:
1) UNDER TEEES LAW, WITHOUT is ANY AOMINISTEMENTIVE ADVERSURE PROFESURE FOR DESIGN OF THE BORKE TO DEAN UNTHINELY MOTION TO RE-AVEN HEARING FOR ACTUAL HONORANOIE, FACITUAL, AND STADEBELY FALGONELS, BE- - CAUSE RELATOR WAS NOT BEEN CONVOCED OF A FELICY OFFINES COMMUTED WICLE AN AOMINISTEMENT REPASSE; AND HE WAS NOT BEEN CONDINED TO A TERM OF CONFIRMEMENT IN A PALLAL HISTITATION; THE DETERMINATION SINGLES NOT HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED TO BE A SUFFEYEMENT HEARING TO REPASSE WAS PAROLE FOR ABOUTENELY AND CHEMIDOUS RELIGION, HE IS ILLIGALLY, VIOLENIFICITY, AND UNDERSTEADINGING ONTHINED IN A PALLAL HISTITATION. 2) THE ABOUTENINE MOTION OF WHEN A PRESANE CAN ATTACK A COMED DECISION IS TO FIE A PATIANN FOR A UNIT OF MANUAMINUS MEANST THE BORKE. 3) TAS EAGLEY SINGLES DEANI EALLY FALGY TO FIE DICINAL ADV
*3
RELEV DEAN FALKE P823-542398 Relative v3. teens dehuctrunt of deiminal Esties - Duision of Board of Andents and Anedles Resimident
IN the Faxetientin
Medication to Meded without
Rechecment of Fecs; REV:DWIST. 100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
*4 IN THE
FouREentH
CAME OF ARPEALS
FRIED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON TEXAS
AUG 21 2016 CHRISTOPHER A. PHINE CLERK
WEST No.
RiceV Dean Foulter, ReLable
VS.
TEVAS DEBURTHENT OF DERMALAL Justice - DUSSEYON OF BAMED OF ARPEALS AND PAREALS, RESPONDENT
ORIGINAL APPLICATION FOR WEST OF MEASONS
*5
WILKY DEAN FOLLER
Jos.1-54239B in the Relative VS.
FoxtentH feves deanement of counal Justice - divisiof of BORRS of Arroors and Rarits Respondent
CERCULAR ADJICATIOR FOR WEST OF MAROANUS
To the HONORANUS JUOSE OF SAND COURT:
comes now, RICKY DEAN FOLLER, RELATOR, PRO SE, in the HOURS STOled ACTIOT AND FIIE tUS CERCINAL ADJICATIOR FOR WEST OF mandarins, possiant to section SOB. 284; AND SOB.283, of the feges Gouberment rode anby, and woue show the court the following:
I.
LIBRARI CONSTRUCTION Relative request this court to view his pleadings in light or liberal constriction. II.
REPRECHER HISTORY
1) Relative's Funds was received eacause us vobated the RELIGUE and Dividends of his Funds of nomittitio to theft (attempted) of markel, a misdepresarice of Ftats. 2) Relative sought to record reference and Reinsure soffertsors with dined via FIVE HG. 1182, under crevational cracumstances wnceanited of the Eviouice of RELITOR'S CPS monsitor muiement deeumentation funds.
III. Elams
*6 Relafue, RtLKY BeAN Faulce, 1803 - 552388 , is an offerente incrncseated in the tews detwritient of deaninal Jastes - instictional divesor (1805-10), and is naterritial who se, who can be located at Jastes 3 Unit, 3 Jastie Roed, Rewmond, 1804577406.
Relafue was derousted was Remedies and was no otive adequate reamsd at law. the net swout to be Dematised is miscistiond, not disdertiond in nature. Based rule 146.5 (a)(b)(a)(a); rule 146.10 (a)(b)(b)(b); rule 146.11 (b); rule 146.12 (a)(b)(a)(a); the. cou. code min, sos. 285 (a)(b); sos. 285 (a)(a), (c)(d), and (e)(foemly the. code dem. Pecs. Act. 42.18, 14(a)); Act of June 14, 2001, 77th L6., R.S., EH.PSG, H, 2001 Tov. Cun. laws 1608 (mineriv6 tov. cou. code min. sos. 285 (a)(b); and sos. 283 (a)(a), (c), (d), and (e) aAtiquals to Reveations occurn6 of the searence 1, 2001), on June 29, 2012, Relafue Peced no ructurtiers/ wo couldd to ettimated fuff of matieral < 200 K , in county buet at law number 1, Galveston County, Gaves number 110 - 0321577 , in exaunice for 360 days county Jail, when isolated the based of pascons and aadutes rule 42: as set out in the preciclerty of rctious, states: I sown commit no oftrie reantist the laws of this state of any otive state of the United States.
Relafue's made oftrie mat Fandex, devout made decterivis to county Jail on August 27, 2012, while visitiv6 relafue, the. Fandex adased Relafue that if uivud be dest of He wivled Recectation maveriv and adant to visitativ6 dased rille 43, since 165 Ahead who wivicdere/ no canet to misdernivise case, Relafue obtained to me Fandex that the cunt reason He AEd was decousis was morive and deteased on June 20, 2012 and He was deaced under daces of the Jastie system only decous of his past legal decations. Relafue's made oftrie, mat Fandex, adased upon Relafue detwivis waviv6 wivive that He would wicive in Refee--ation information datticked for daced minest REVieW of all evidence the Relafue's 3 m Mo.fech Des manted movement movis for 12 -23-11, the NIEDED date of visitation occturtiue.
The Relafue's wavivis was redo of wivive, an adcectors and fradivis was condicted of daced minivis to the above mentioned cause and information, sounited; when evcived the Relafue's 3 m Mo.fech Des manted movement movis for date of adaced oftrie. Relafue's made was retobed. Relafue dem that under precictional adcrimstantes, his case manable mat Fandex, and a dity and desanivility to scomt and file all evcivise in the state's excectors, evciscautory evidence as was as inestimator, the 3 m Mo.fech Des maniderm system is the daced of adcecis and adeciss safeclumec decetictory for society. 180 state of the net with erod devociond gives precise and moneatic des locations.
*7 Relative claims unage this exceptional accountante, especially in the based's assessment, thus element of material fact should have been considered to be sufficient evidence in debeming the instatement of the reference or reference to be examined and in the assessment of the based of persons and persons information decters- ing office, most forgered, Relative's case managed. The 3m two-foot EAS monstrated system would have evorelated the relative, and should that the relative could not have isolated due to, nor committed the subject before if no was not relevant or not the stated location on 12-23-11. (see Sab. 254 (a)). Relative believe the based would have be nested, concemed, or modified his model, but the two based's claim that relative would not reveceat evidence, reble was direct motion to be very relevant or reworked assistant to based's due up. It, and direct special review process due 145:7 (b)(a). (see atthements A and B) Relative claims that rewevered based of persons and persons was failed to be monstrated only to hold a fine reference was the refeet -146 was held as wavers, an referentare was cowed was crouvered as based analysis on subject 29, 2012, rewevered to be 2012, and 2014. The revece a refeet for a correction of the violation, the refeet and rewering effect of the based debeming that a reference was also corrected of a refeet, afterste committed a vile as nonmosterative reference was not satisfied to a form of confincment in a real institution, the debemination is considered to be a sufficient reafine to revece the refeet. Revevered violated this study, but not have aubjecte to revece Relative's refeet assistant to Sab. 251 (a)(a), some. Relative states without reweight that the refeet could not have been reveced fincment to Sab. 251 (a), some, because unage the sdefect for revece of Relative's refeet, if is not refeceat to a misdemean the refeet as the relative was found to have isolated conditions of revece of the refeet refeet by the based analysis fincment, see and compece rewevered, wavers, referentare and fincment res. be 2014. (b), some. Revece the refeet, refeet, refeet fincment, the refeet, the refeet, the refeet, the refeet, the refeet, the refeet, the refeet, the refeet, the refeet, the refeet, the refeet, the refeet, the refeet, the refeet, the refeet, the refeet, the refeet, the refeet, the refeet, the refeet, the refeet, the refeet, the refeet, the refeet, the refeet, the refeet, the refeet, the refeet, the refeet, the refeet, the refeet, the refeet, the refeet, the refeet, the refeet, the refeet, the refeet, the refeet, the refeet, the refeet
*8 Based of abeours and abeules whom fules to act be mereem a misstised out of deshortable intemoral down him, when the abeure hevection abeess of the Relative, hendises the Relative's hevection of his abeure to be wiskal, untruthily, and unconstitutionally due to the Based's abeut's abeutemery and cabaleous actions. The Relative claims the danced's agent, must fancen, his abeure can't manually, failed in his misstised act, and deshortable as an intemodinary defision the Relative and the danced of abeours and abeure to desient all desient and obinstient Feats of desumentation and bade evopage of the abeured Reile violation, to indicate as Represed by the Relative, by not Comited to the Relative's 310 Re-tecn Gits minitive movinient events data, desiented on a daily basis to the wivative abeure of fice, in possession of must fancen, the Relative's base manually, and denitude for the abeure danced's adnict Reven for fincings in a wavere Heavens; but when not desiented of intemated in the desient of divarile by the danced dANes of anuled to make a sufficient and fine fincing in the fevection of the Relative's abeure. This abeutemery and canderous action by the Based's agent and intemodinary defision the Relative and the danced of abeours and abeules vebated the the dANe Code now. 308.254 (a); danced of abeours and abeules rules (46.5(a)(a) if cannot be Revised that the abeure must fules that a misdemeanly of divarile exists that a dancient of abeure was vebated, if desient and desinstient fraction/ evopage is wavering by danced agent, must fancen, the Relative's base manually in possession of both desumentation and of the danced's request of any state of the hevection abeures. Rule (46.10(a)(a) if cannot be Revised that a fine and deficient extimation Heavens was cobadient, when the danced's agent, must fancen, dossertimely deasan to omit and not reasent of submit desimentation of divarile that evopcents the Relative of violation. A dancient of rule of his abeure rextues. The above mentioned tey. but case now. Stable and rules adnictes by the danced of abeours and abeules must be fadiven and manuled to, whicen is the only way the danced could have Revised the Relative's abeure. Reasent to the but case now. 308.254 (a)(b), the Relative, is entitled to a Heavens abeure a abeure must be a designated agent of the danced and the rules adnicted. Receives of wiveted the Relative waived redecation Heavens as not, the Relative is also entitled to a fine and deficient wavere Heavens by the danced and the redecination of all Facts Dack쌍mative the abeured of fice, violation of a Reile of condition of Refeats, of canderous defision... tey. But case now. 308.254 (a), some.
The determination of which not have been concemed to be a sufficient Heavens to revere Relative's abeure, Relative is actually inovent of stable for determination
*9 of based analysis fincurios to whecant fevization of his meale cored oueed fices and ow. studies find meale debeminations made oue to "not manure unobtrited of the elogies." Ancomit to by. ow. ow. oue 227 (a)(a)(a), and 528.283 (a)(a)(a)(e), eeeuise of meallogery and cacefulness ecesses. Relative is untrivicty and unmosttitionally teadized of a fixed institution. Relatue ofifies when and reesides with this oueed values. Relatue's eluims and deant him retisf to when He must be entitled, wibec alu, the fevization of his meale fefricted oue that and how mantus theneds. Relatue's look wov of 药omates of delusion time to his temminity sashore of sounteed values at the time of fevization of his meale, time that which have been deeated if his meale was not fevated of fevibrated, untrivictly. Relatue's meale sivels not have been fevated, but nadew sunitiored at oext, whose oueed five 146.12 (a)(a)(a)(a); of by. ow. oue and. 225.283 (a)(a)(a)(a) (e). Relative elums that restened was a missted oue and restened by the ow. odes. min. 528.254(a); 528.281(a)(i); and 528.283 (a)(a)(a)(d)(e). To refeem a fink, sufficient, and constitutional wivile remenis to fivine Relatue's meale. Relatue was oUried a fink, sufficient, and constitutional wivile remenis deforss oueed's most witued deforent and sounteent oue addees in his desission form the fevization and sunitious remenis fences: to wif the Relatue's sin of the fink oue mustoe movenent mants oue, remenation, if reesided, oUEd have refoced the fincurios and debeminiation of the wivile remenis andest that a condition of five of the Relatue's meale was in fact not been vivuled, natiowon the relatue remitted to the misdemanive eferase wivile whose oueed. Relatue is entitled to a cawful, sufficient, and fink remenis and sunitious remeis, the oue receses eluive reuides an monuistrutive referase with secedeal rights before his meale can be fevated.
Relative deliures He has made a meale sivivivic of fuctual and sinitioy netual invocative eluim, refultive is entitled to deant of monomanis retisf. Relative is uledally and unmosttordinarily confided in a neural institution, visulity his sth Amendment Kecef "wbe ceryt and owvowd Amendment infected" of the viribd state Anstitution, as well as his 5th and 14th Amendment's oue receses eluives. Relatue will conthave to sivile when and reesides, and remain usigquly and unmosttordinarily confided in a neural institution, if this fucetely dowe of abeade do not reme the misers of siven eluims, sivilee will result in a miscacelide. Relative elums that he cede of low, siviles, and fices which be considered an exsustaneal chesimstive in the eyes of sivile and fuceres and oueed.
*10
Relative continues that this level was transaction unjute the autowert of tews constitution netude 55; 1st, 5th, 9th, and 11th annomments of the related states constitution; tews Government code associated 508.281, 508.283, such. Relative request this level to baccodk univtude its uses and después deed lemedi.
II.
Conflisioed
unobefone, premises consubers, Relative, Recev dean Finkle, reo se, Respecteunl' Repres? A Finkule thad Recevident and not refised Relative A Fink, souncand, and constitutionally Resubetion nisulith and the bases of ancouns and mentes unipnstibtionally Revised Relabes macole and racerted His "slees" time "seget and lusefes reacdencly, due to valations of the thins Eor--revinent code statutes, and bases of ancouns and mentes mentes fises Revised to Revege the Relabes' macole, conthine the Relative's macole, as monerf the Relabes' macole in a Fink, Sourcand, and constitutionally Rea--wation nisulith. Relative's macole serves as Re-insluted nolivision immeas mably, without racted delev, and reabetion of the reletions "slees" there "recent racerted us a record of the recortion of Relabes macole in nisus? 29, 2012, from the date of administrative recons to macole, dismend 14, 2019.
Respecteunl' Demitted, Rudy Dean Trullin Recev Dean Finkle, *542378 Pto. Se Relabel Tested 3 Unit 3 Tastbe Kend Reinmond, Tewas 77406
*11
Worries Dethadation
I, Rerey Dean Fawies, 100 &ov Decare undoe mrantry of mectuer that, wrewnies to my deffer, that the Facts slated in the oterial amsication for over 15 maniemes, the the and deffer whose times over mectures Remedies had monorated, 132.001, 132.023.
Ricey Dean Jubar. Ricky Dean Fawies/Reicabe
Feftrents of Salire
I, Rerey Dean Fawies, amly mownd and Possibly moneateded in 1803-10, at the Sacthe 3 ches, 3 Sacthe found, in Remmond thens 17406. Do 100 &ov Represst the sind deek of the over to Focumed a tive and deffered over of the above Focquing oterial amsication for over of maniemes to the resandent, or alnend the same in the U.S. maul mithes and. when can be recened at the Following mores:
Dilepthe of the bawed of mores and mores to 10 Swat beeen Boviered Hishn. Foces 19057
Ricky Dean Jubar. Ricky Dean Fawies/Relare
*12
State of Texas Board of PARDONS and PAROLES
Bettie L. Wells General Counsel
October 16, 2012 Fowler, Ricky Dean TDCJ-CID# 542398 Holliday Unit 295 I.H. 45 N Huntsville, Texas 77320
RE: MOTION TO REOPEN HEARING
Dear Mr. Fowler: The Board of Pardons and Paroles is in receipt of your correspondence postmarked 10/09/2012. Your original Motion to Reopen Hearing received on 9/06/2012 was not processed because you waived your hearing. Your recent Motion to Reopen Hearing is considered a supplemental request and will not be processed for the same reason your original request was not processed. No further consideration will be given concerning your request.
Be advised that subsequent letters requesting the same relief will be placed in your TDCJ-CID Parole Division file.
Sincerely,
David M. McKinney
Assistant General Counsel
DMM/jsm cc: File
*13
STATE OF TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES
July 29, 2013 Mr. Ricky Fowler TDCJ-CID/SID # 00542398 Huntsville Unit ROW D-3-11 815 12th Street Huntsville, Texas 77342 Dear Mr. Fowler: This is to acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated July 09, 2013. Special Review applies to cases reviewed during the normal review process and denied release to parole or mandatory supervision. A request for a Special Review shall be considered only in the following circumstances.
- A parole panel member who voted with the majority on the panel desires to have the decision reconsidered prior to the next review date.
- A written request on behalf of an offender cites information not previously available to the parole panel. In accordance with Section 145.17 (C), Texas Administrative Code, all requests for special review shall be in writing and signed by the offender or their attorney.
Information not previously available shall mean only: (A) responses from trial officials and victims; (B) a change in an offender's sentence and judgment; or (C) an allegation that the parole panel commits an error in law or board rule.
Allegation(s) must clearly show/state the error in law or board rule. 3. If both parole panel members who voted with the majority are no longer active board members or parole commissioners, the presiding officer (chair) or designated board member may place the decision in the special review process to be reconsidered prior to the next review date.
Your request does not meet one of the above criteria at this time.
Sincerely,
Denise Williams Program Supervisor III DW/br cc: File
*14