History
  • No items yet
midpage
89 A.D.3d 1318
N.Y. App. Div.
2011

In the Matter of CHERYL PARSONS REUL, a Suspended Attorney, Respondent. COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS, Petitioner.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York

November 23, 2011

932 NYS2d 731

Per Curiam.

By decision dated February 17, 2011, this Court vacated respondent’s stayed suspension and suspended her until June 17, 2011 (Matter of Reul, 81 AD3d 1158 [2011]). She now applies for reinstatement. Petitioner advises that it does not oppose the application.

Our examination of the papers submitted on the application indicates that respondent has complied with the provisions of the order of suspension and with this Court’s rules regarding the conduct of suspended attorneys (see 22 NYCRR 806.9). We are also satisfied that respondent has complied with the requirements of this Court’s rule regarding reinstatement (see 22 NYCRR 806.12 [b]), and that she possesses the character and general fitness to resume the practice of law.

Accordingly, the application is granted and respondent is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Peters, J.P., Spain, Rose, Malone Jr. and Stein, JJ., concur.

Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Reul
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 17, 2011
Citations: 89 A.D.3d 1318; 932 N.Y.2d 731
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In