History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re: Raymond Chestnut v.
692 F. App'x 137
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymond Edward Chestnut, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Edward Chestnut petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking to compel the district court to act on his Motion to Vacate Stay Order. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court has denied the motion. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

2

Case Details

Case Name: In Re: Raymond Chestnut v.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jun 23, 2017
Citation: 692 F. App'x 137
Docket Number: 17-1223
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.