2 Mills Surr. 103 | N.Y. Sur. Ct. | 1901
It bas long been tbe practice of tbis court to permit contestants in proceedings to admit wills to probate to withdraw tbeir objections, not withstanding tbe protests of tbeir attorneys claiming liens for services. An unreported memorandum of Ransom, S., states tbe rule and places it upon tbe ground that, in probate cases, tbe surrogate has special powers and duties imposed upon him by tbe statute, which vest in him tbe control, to a great extent, of tbe proceedings, irrespective of tbe wishes of tbe parties or tbeir attorneys, and that tbe rights and interests of other parties require that a contest should not be continued to be prosecuted for the mere purpose of determining a controversy between one of tbe parties in interest and bis attorney. Matter of Peter Wittner, Surr. Decs., 1890, 464. I am not disposed to overrule tbis decision, and, independent of it, I greatly doubt that tbe filing of objections to tbe
Decreed accordingly.