History
  • No items yet
midpage
27 A.3d 1210
N.J.
2011

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 11-061, concluding that PHILIP C. PROTHRO of JERSEY CITY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2005, should be disciplined for violating RPC 8.1(a)(knowingly making a false statement of material fact to a disciplinary authority), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation);

And the Court having determined from its review of the matter that a censure is the appropriate quantum of discipline for respondent’s unethical conduct;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that PHILIP C. PROTHRO is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State.

Case Details

Case Name: In Re Prothro
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Oct 5, 2011
Citations: 27 A.3d 1210; 2011 N.J. LEXIS 945; 208 N.J. 340; D-148 September Term 2010, 068838
Docket Number: D-148 September Term 2010, 068838
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified
and are not legal advice.
Log In
    In Re Prothro, 27 A.3d 1210