History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Price
100 Ohio St. 3d 204
Ohio
2003
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the juvenile court for further proceedings consistent with In re Thomas, 100 Ohio St.3d 89, 2003-Ohio-5162, 796 N.E.2d 908.

Robin N. Piper, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, and Michael D. Baker, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee state of Ohio. David H. Bodiker, State Public Defender, and Molly J. McAnespie, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant David Price. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.





Dissenting Opinion

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting.

{¶ 2} For the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in In re Thomas, 100 Ohio St.3d 89, 2003-Ohio-5162, 796 N.E.2d 908, I would also allow credit for the appellant’s time spent at the Butler County Rehabilitation Center against the time of his commitment to the Department of Youth Services. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Price
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 5, 2003
Citation: 100 Ohio St. 3d 204
Docket Number: Nos. 2002-0777 and 2002-0825
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.