114 F. Supp. 764 | S.D.N.Y. | 1953
Petitioner, fifty-eight years of age, a native of Bulgaria, was admitted to this country for permanent residence on July 24th, 1945. On December 26th, 1951, he filed a petition for naturalization under the general provisions of the Nationality Act of 1940.
A preliminary hearing was conducted before a designated examiner
(1) That the petitioner does not intend to reside permanently in the United States and that he did not so intend on the date of the filing of his petition for naturalization ;
(2) That he has not been attached to the-principles of the Constitution and well dis
(3) That he has not been a person of good moral character during the period required by law. In the case of the petitioner this is five years immediately prior to the filing of the petition, or December 26th, 1946.
The burden of proof is upon the applicant for naturalization to establish by satisfactory evidence that he has had the requisite qualifications for citizenship.
A final hearing was conducted in open court
Upon a review of the entire record and after observing the witneses called by both sides, their demeanor, bearing and appearance, and upon considering their interests and possible motives, I find that the petitioner does not intend to reside permanently in the United States and did not so intend on December 26th, 1951, when he filed his petition for naturalization.
Petitioner’s categorical denial and the testimony of his witnesses, mostly of a negative character, failed to repel the cumulative force of the testimony offered by the Government witnesses. To reject their testimony I would have to find that they testified falsely. This I am not prepared to do; certainly it is not warranted by the evidence. Petitioner’s denial that he made the statements attributed to him with respect to permanent residence was not only unconvincing but served to emphasize the truthfulness of the versions of the Government witnesses. His charge that they were hostile and prejudiced against him was not impressive, and his attempted explanation of the underlying reasons for the alleged hostility was at
Having found that petitioner did express himself as testified to by the Government witnesses and that his denial of their testimony was untrue, there is no reason why such declarations should not be accepted as expressive of his true intent. In any event, upon the entire record such doubt exists on the issue of petitioner’s intention permanently to reside in the United States as to require denial of his application.
With respect to the other grounds advanced by the Government for denial of petitioner’s application, the evidence offered, while accepted as true, is not legally sufficient to warrant denial.
The foregoing shall constitute findings of fact and conclusions of law unless either party desires enumerated findings which may be proposed upon notice to the other side.
Settle final order upon notice.
. The present proceeding, although heard after the effective date of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, 8 U.S.C.A. § 1101 et seq., is governed by the provisions of the Nationality Act of 1940. See Public Law 414, Act of June 27, 1952, 66 Stat. 163, § 405(b), 8 U.S.C.A. § 1101 note.
. 8 U.S.C. § 733 [1952 Act, 8 U.S.C.A. § 1446].
. 8 U.S.C. § 732(a) (18) [1952 Act, 8 U.S.C.A. § 1445(f)].
. 8 U.S.C. § 707(a) [1952 Act, 8 U.S.C. A. § 1427(a)].
. United States v. Schwimmer, 279 U.S. 644, 649, 49 S.Ct. 448, 73 L.Ed. 889.
. Krausse v. United States, 2 Cir., 194 F.2d 440.
. United States v. Schwimmer, footnote 5, supra; United States v. Macintosh, 283 U.S. 605, 626, 51 S.Ct. 570, 75 L.Ed. 1302; United States v. Manzi, 276 U.S. 463, 467, 48 S.Ct. 328, 72 L.Ed. 654.
. 8 U.S.C. § 734 [1952 Act, 8 U.S.C.A. § 1447].
. The petition for naturalization as required by 8 U.S.C. § 732(a) (18) contains the statement: “It is my intention in good faith to become a citizen of the United States, and to reside permanently therein.”
. Baumgartner v. United States, 322 U. S. 665, 673, 64 S.Ct. 1240, 88 L.Ed. 1525; United States v. Rossler, 2 Cir., 144 F.2d 463.