History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Parsons
678 A.2d 1022
D.C.
1996
Check Treatment

AMENDED ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility, recommending that the respondent be publicly censured for commingling a client’s funds in violation of Disciplinary Rule 9-103(A), the letter from Bar Counsel electing not to note an exception to the report and recommendation of the Board on Profession*1023al Responsibility, and it appearing that respondent elected not to note an exception to the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility, it is

ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule XI, § 11(f)(1) of the Rules Governing the Bar, effective January 1, 1995, the recommendation by the Board on Professional Responsibility to impose discipline consisting of publicly censuring respondent is hereby adopted; it is, accordingly,

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent, Charles C. Parsons, be and he hereby is, publicly censured.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Parsons
Court Name: District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 13, 1996
Citation: 678 A.2d 1022
Docket Number: No. 96-BG-119
Court Abbreviation: D.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.