179 A.D. 786 | N.Y. App. Div. | 1917
The relator filed with the board- of assessors of the city of New York a claim for damages to its property located at the northwest corner of One Hundred and Forty-ninth street and St. Ann’s avenue, caused by the city’s changing the grade of East One Hundred and Forty-ninth street and St. Ann’s avenue, in the borough of The Bronx. On July 6, 1917, the board of assessors made an award to the relator in the sum of $3,000. The relator claims also to be entitled to interest on this award from the date of the commencement of the work down to the time of payment of the award. The defendant contends that no interest is payable.
The work in connection with the change of grade was commenced on or before December 30, 1904, and was completed November 10, 1906. At that time there was no law providing for the payment of interest on awards. In 1910, however, section 59a was added to the Highway Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 25 [Laws of 1909, chap. 30], as added by Laws of 1910, chap. 701), which provides: “Whenever awards shall be lawfully made, pursuant to any statute of this State, for damages sustained by real estate or any improvements thereon by reason of any change of grade of any street, avenue or road in front thereof, the award for the principal amount of damages sustained shall bear interest at the rate of six per centum per annum from the time of the change of grade to the time of the payment of the award.”
This law was enacted to remedy the defect of failure to provide for the payment of interest in statutes awarding damages for changes of grade, and has been held to be retroactive (People ex rel. Central Trust Co. v. Prendergast, 202 N. Y. 188); hence, respondent was thereunder entitled to interest on its award. By chapter 516 of the Laws of 1916, section 951 of the Greater New York charter (Laws of 1901, chap. 466) was
The appellant contends that under the first sentence above quoted, no interest is payable on the award in question by reason of the fact that at the time of the completion of the change of grade in 1906 there was no law in forcé providing for the payment of interest. But under the act of 1910 the relator was, as before stated, entitled to be paid interest on its award. The 1916 amendment itself dealt with the subject of interest, and had the Legislature intended to revoke the right to the payment of interest given by the 1910 enactment, it doubtless would have expressly so provided. Section 952 of the charter provides that “ The foregoing section [951] shall not be construed to authorize the making of an award for loss or damage caused by change of grade in any case in which an award could not legally be made under laws existing immediately previous to the passage of this act.”
We are of opinion that the provision of section 951 under consideration was intended merely to preserve the right to damages where such existed prior to the enactment of the charter of 1897 (Chap. 378), and to exclude the possibility of creating such right where none had theretofore existed; so that if at the time the change of grade was effected there was no law awarding damages therefor, then there would be no liability whatsoever under the act. It remains then only to decide as from what date the interest runs.
The wording of amended section 951 of the charter quoted above specifically provides for the payment of interest from the “ time of the completion and acceptance of the grading.”
It follows, therefore, that the order appealed from should be modified so as to provide for the payment of the said
Clarke, P. J., Scott, Davis and Shearn, JJ., concurred.
Order modified as stated in opinion and as modified affirmed. Order to be settled on notice.
