History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re O'Hara
18 F. Cas. 622
W.D. Pa.
1868
Check Treatment
McCANDLESS, District Judge.

As the solution of this question does not depend upon any statutory provision, and, as a precedent, is of consequence to the profession and the public, before concurring with the register, I have given to the subject mature consideration. I have arrived at the conclusion that his opinion is based on sound principles, and sustained by sufficient authority. The fund is within the control of the court, and it is our province so. to administer it as to do exact justice to all the creditors. We have judicial knowledge of the professional services rendered by the able counsel of the petitioning creditors, by whose exertions the fund has been realized; and, as we consider the fee charged reasonable, it is proper that their compensation, as one of the incidental expenses, should be deducted before distribution. The decision of the register is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: In re O'Hara
Court Name: District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Date Published: Dec 15, 1868
Citation: 18 F. Cas. 622
Court Abbreviation: W.D. Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.