Crim. No. 2306 | Cal. | Apr 16, 1920

Lead Opinion

THE COURT.

—The facts in this case are in all material respects the same as those in the Matter of Biccardi, ante, p. 675, [189 P. 694" date_filed="1920-04-16" court="Cal." case_name="In Re Riccardi">189 Pac. 694], The conviction of the accused, was in the United States district court of the northern district of California, and was for conspiring to violate the acts of Congress of May 18, 1917, and June 15, 1917, and the case is pending on writ of error in the United States supreme court.

It is ordered that action upon the certified copy of the judgment presented be deferred pending the determination of the appeal of the attorney from such judgment.






Dissenting Opinion

LENNON, J., Dissenting.

—For the reasons given in my dissent from the prevailing court opinion in the Matter of Riccardi, ante, p. 675, [189 Pac. 694], I dissent from the prevailing opinion in the instant case.

Rehearing denied.

Lawlor, J., Lennon, J., and Olney, J., dissented from order denying a rehearing.






Dissenting Opinion

OLNEY, J., Dissenting.

—I dissent for the reasons given in the dissenting opinion in the companion case of Riccardi.

Lawlor, J., concurred.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.