History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Oceanic Steam Navigation Co.
204 F. 259
2d Cir.
1913
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Two motious have been made: One, to dismiss an appeal; the other, for a mandamus.

As to the motion to dismiss, we think that the injunction order appealed from disposes of appellant’s right (assuming that he has rights) with such absolute finality that it may, as to him, be considered a final decision within the meaning of the statute. The motion to dismiss is therefore denied.

Since the claimant in the other application may obtain relief by appeal, it is not necessary to consider the further questions presented by his application for mandamus.

The appeal may be set for argument on the 17th of February.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Oceanic Steam Navigation Co.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Date Published: Feb 11, 1913
Citation: 204 F. 259
Docket Number: No. 206
Court Abbreviation: 2d Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.